Starkey LA, Bowles JV, Blagburn BL. Comparison of acid- versus heat-treatment for immune complex dissociation and detection of Dirofilaria immitis antigen in canine plasma.
Vet Parasitol 2020;
282:109134. [PMID:
32474295 DOI:
10.1016/j.vetpar.2020.109134]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Annual antigen testing is a mainstay for diagnosing infection with Dirofiliaria immitis in dogs; yet, it has been documented that some heartworm-infected dogs and cats test false-negative for antigen due to the presence of antigen-antibody complexes. Several studies have reported the use of heat as a reliable means of immune-complex dissociation (ICD) in recent years; however, the data regarding the use of acid as a reliable method of ICD for D. immitis detection are limited. The objective of this study was to compare an acid-based form of ICD to the more established and evaluated method of heat-based ICD in experimentally infected and non-infected dogs. Plasma from class A dogs experimentally infected ∼4 months prior with D. immitis (infected; n = 24) and dogs reared indoors with no history of exposure to mosquitoes (non-infected; n = 75) were evaluated for presence of D. immitis antigen (DiroCHEK® Heartworm antigen test kit). Each sample was divided into three aliquots for testing: [1] Control plasma (no acid- or heat-treatment), [2] acid-treated plasma (trichloroacetic acid (TCA), incubation, centrifugation for 5 min at 16,000 X g, buffer), and [3] heat-treated plasma (104 °C followed by centrifugation at 16,000 X g). Treatments for each aliquot were performed and tested in triplicate; results were determined both visually (color change) and by spectrophotometric analysis (optical density [OD] value). Of the 24 infected dogs, 0/24 tested positive for antigen in the absence of acid- or heat-treatment. Those same plasma samples following processing by either acid- or heat-treatment yielded 18/24 (75.0%) and 19/24 (79.2%) antigen-positive results, respectively. Of the 75 plasma samples from non-infected dogs, neither acid- nor heat-treatment of plasma caused any false-positive color changes or spectrophotometric values. These results indicate that acid as a means of ICD reliably allowed for the detection of D. immitis antigen in infected plasma while not inducing false-positive results in non-infected plasma samples.
Collapse