Clinical and pathological features of immune-mediated necrotising myopathies in a single-centre muscle biopsy cohort

Objective

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) is a subset of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) characterized by significantly elevated creatine kinase level, muscle weakness and predominant muscle fibre necrosis in muscle biopsy. This study aimed to investigate the clinical and pathological characteristics of patients with IMNM in a single-centre muscle biopsy cohort.

Methods

A total of 860 patients who had muscle biopsy reports in our centre from May 2008 to December 2017 were enrolled in this study. IMNM was diagnosed according to the 2018 European Neuromuscular Centre (ENMC) clinicopathological diagnostic criteria for IMNM.

Results

The muscle biopsy cohort consisted of 531 patients with IIM (61.7%), 253 patients with non-IIM (29.4%), and 76 undiagnosed patients (8.8%). IIM cases were classified as IMNM (68[7.9%]), dermatomyositis (346[40.2%]), anti-synthetase syndrome (82[9.5%]), polymyositis (32[3.7%]), and sporadic inclusion body myositis (3[0.3%]). Limb girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD) 2B and lipid storage myopathy (LSM) are the two most common non-IIM disorders in our muscle biopsy cohort. IMNM patients had a higher onset age (41.57 ± 14.45 vs 21.66 ± 7.86 and 24.56 ± 10.78, p < .0001), shorter duration (21.79 ± 26.01 vs 66.69 ± 67.67 and 24.56 ± 10.78, p < .0001), and more frequent dysphagia (35.3% vs. 3.4 and 6.3%, p = .001) than LGMD 2B and LSM patients. Muscle biopsy from IMNM showed more frequent muscle fibre necrosis (95.6% vs 72.4 and 56.3%, p < .0001), overexpression of major histocompatibility complex-I on sarcolemma (83.8% vs 37.9 and 12.9%, p < .0001), and CD4⁺ T cell endomysia infiltration (89.7% vs 53.6 and 50%, p < .0001) compared with those from LGMD 2B and LSM patients.

Conclusions

It is easy to distinguish IMNM from other IIM subtypes according to clinical symptoms and myositis specific antibodies profiles. However, distinguishing IMNM from disorders clinically similar to non-IIM needs combined clinical, serological and pathological features.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12891-022-05372-z.

Outcome Predictors of Immune-Mediated Necrotising Myopathy-A Retrospective, Multicentre Study

OBJECTIVES

Evidence-based treatment protocols are currently lacking for immune-mediated necrotising myopathy. In this multicentre retrospective study, we examined baseline clinical characteristics and treatment variables that may predict short-term outcome of patients with immune-mediated necrotising myopathy.

METHODS

Muscle biopsies from the John Hunter Hospital and the Royal Adelaide Hospital obtained between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed at a single laboratory at South Australia Pathology. All biopsies with histological features of IMNM were identified. Demographics of study subjects, clinical information, and myositis-specific antibody status were recorded along with muscle strength, serum CK and treatment regimens at baseline, three and six months. Primary outcome measures were muscle strength and serum creatinine kinase at 3- and 6-months. Mixed-effects regression models in a Bayesian framework were performed using Statistical Package R.

RESULTS

Female sex, older age, initial prednisone dose and intravenous methylprednisolone were associated with greater improvement in serum creatine kinase. In patients with moderate-to-severe disease at baseline, early intravenous immunoglobulin was associated with greater improvement in hip flexor strength at six months.

CONCLUSION

Early IVIg was associated with clinical improvement in short-term follow-up in IMNM. Female sex, older age, initial oral prednisone dose and initial use of IV methylprednisolone were associated with better biochemical improvement.

Myo-Spain: Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy. Methodology

OBJECTIVES

To describe the methods of the Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (Myo-Spain), as well as its strengths and limitations. The main objective of the project is to analyse the evolution and clinical management of a cohort of patients with IIM.

METHODS

Observational, longitudinal, ambispective and multicentre study of a cohort of patients with IIM seen in rheumatology units in Spain. All patients with a diagnosis of IMM will be included in the regular follow-up of the participating centres, regardless of age on initiation of the process. Incident cases will be all patients who at the beginning of the study have been diagnosed for less than 12 months and prevalent cases for more than 12 months. The registry will include data from the visit at baseline, one year and two years. Socio-demographic, clinical, analytical variables, complications, comorbidities, association with other rheumatic diseases, hospital admissions, mortality and treatments will be collected. In addition, indices, scales and questionnaires of activity, muscle involvement, damage, disability, and quality of life will be determined. The recruitment period will be 23 months. The purpose is to obtain a cohort of 400 patients with IMM.

CONCLUSIONS

Myo-Spain registry provides the opportunity to develop a cohort of incident and prevalent patients with IMM in Spain. Myo-Spain will be able to assess in detail the clinical characteristics of the disease at different times. The comprehensive information collected during the visits is expected to provide a broad source of data for future analysis.

Myo-Spain: Spanish Registry of Patients with Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathy. Methodology

OBJECTIVES

To describe the methods of the Spanish Registry of patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) (Myo-Spain), as well as its strengths and limitations. The main objective of the project is to analyse the evolution and clinical management of a cohort of patients with IIM.

METHODS

Observational, longitudinal, ambispective and multicentre study of a cohort of patients with IIM seen in rheumatology units in Spain. All patients with a diagnosis of IMM will be included in the regular follow-up of the participating centres, regardless of age on initiation of the process. Incident cases will be all patients who at the beginning of the study have been diagnosed for less than 12 months and prevalent cases for more than 12 months. The registry will include data from the visit at baseline, one year and two years. Socio-demographic, clinical, analytical variables, complications, comorbidities, association with other rheumatic diseases, hospital admissions, mortality and treatments will be collected. In addition, indices, scales and questionnaires of activity, muscle involvement, damage, disability, and quality of life will be determined. The recruitment period will be 23 months. The purpose is to obtain a cohort of 400 patients with IMM.

CONCLUSIONS

Myo-Spain registry provides the opportunity to develop a cohort of incident and prevalent patients with IMM in Spain. Myo-Spain will be able to assess in detail the clinical characteristics of the disease at different times. The comprehensive information collected during the visits is expected to provide a broad source of data for future analysis.

Clinical and histological features of immune-mediated necrotising myopathy: A multi-centre South Australian cohort study

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) is a recently described entity. We describe a cohort of South Australian IMNM patients in order to define the spectrum of disease, characterise features that distinguish IMNM from other idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) subtypes and identify factors associated with clinically severe disease. Subjects were identified from the South Australian Myositis Database (SAMD), a histologically defined registry. Consecutive muscle sections from patients with IMNM (n = 62), other forms of IIM (n = 60) and histologically normal muscle (n = 17) were stained using immunohistochemistry and graded. Clinical information was collected from the SAMD and through retrospective chart review. IMNM patients displayed clinical and histological heterogeneity. While most (67%) were profoundly weak at presentation, 24% exhibited mild to moderate weakness and 9% had normal power. Histological myonecrosis ranged from minor to florid. The amount of myofibre complement deposition was closely associated with clinical severity. Patients of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander heritage and those with anti-SRP autoantibodies present with a severe phenotype. Despite intense immunotherapy, few IMNM patients recovered full power at one year follow up. The identification of clinical, serological and histological features which are associated with severe forms of the disease may have diagnostic and therapeutic utility.

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy: A critical review of current concepts

Immune-mediated necrotising myopathy (IMNM) is a relatively recently described form of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM) that is characterised by progressive proximal weakness and few extra-muscular manifestations. Prominent myonecrosis, muscle fibre regeneration and a relative paucity of intramuscular lymphocytes are seen histologically. Immunological mechanisms are believed to underpin the pathogenesis, and intense immunotherapy is frequently required. Disease is often severe and neuromuscular recovery may be poor. Recently there has been an impressive international research effort to understand and characterise this emerging condition, although much remains unknown. Significant advances in the field include the discovery of specific autoantibodies, increased understanding of the risk factors, clinical characteristics and treatment options owing to a wealth of observational studies, and the development of novel classification criteria. Herein we review the current evidence regarding the pathophysiology, clinical presentation, histological features and serological profiles associated with this condition. Diagnostic approaches are discussed, including the role of muscle MRI and antibodies targeting 3‑hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase (HMGCR) and signal-recognition peptide (SRP), and a review of current treatment recommendations is provided.