[Impact of socioeconomic factors on blood pressure control: Observational study about 2887 hypertensive patients]

INTRODUCTION

Despite therapeutic progress, less than half of hypertensive patients are controlled. The objective of this study was to examine the links between blood pressure control and socioeconomic factors.

METHODS

We used data collected in the cardiology department of Sfax University Hospital as part of the Tunisian national hypertension registry. We studied the associations between the socio-economic variables (educational level, profession, medical insurance) and optimal blood pressure control (SBP<140mmHg and DBP<90mmHg) using logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The average age of our population was 65 and the sex ratio was 0.95. We found, as expected, the clinical and behavioral factors associated with a good blood pressure control, namely: female sex, low-sodium diet, therapeutic compliance, and regular physical activity. However, obesity and an increased number of antihypertensive drugs have been associated with poor blood pressure control. The study of the effect of socio-economic variables on BP control finds a significant gradient against the most disadvantaged social categories for our three social variables in the univariate analysis. The inclusion of clinical and behavioral factors in the multivariate analysis attenuated these associations but did not fully explain them.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that there are social inequalities in the control of blood pressure. Social justice and improving living conditions are probably the real solutions to the problem of these social inequalities in health.

[How information on a patient's social status is gathered. An anthropological analysis of the discourses employed in private medical practice]

BACKGROUND

A number of studies have highlighted differences and even discrimination in health care offer according to social category, and shown that they contribute to the production of inequality. On the other hand, when the health care system treats every patient equally, and does not take personal difficulties into consideration, some authors have suggested inequality "by omission". That is why public health actors at different levels have recommended systematic collection of information on patients' social status. The objective of this article is to analyze data gathering on patients' socio-economic condition and its repercussions.

METHODS

The survey is based on more than 50 semi-structured face-to-face interviews with doctors and dentists in private practice. Their answers were subjected to socio-anthropological analysis.

RESULTS

While some practitioners collect information on patients' social status proactively by systematic interrogation, others proceed indirectly and in accordance with subjective criteria. Quite often, patient status remains ignored, usually due to lack of interest, and less frequently because practitioners wish to guard against any risk of stigmatizing underprivileged patients. Different rationales may explain these attitudes: need to prioritize relevant information, wish to observe equity and equality, determination to refrain from social labeling, desire to protect patient self-esteem and to reinforce the practitioner-patient relationship. When identification does occur, it is essentially justified by a desire to adapt the care pathway to potential socio-economic obstacles.

CONCLUSION

When a patient's social situation is sought out by private doctors and dentists, they are mainly concerned with customizing care pathways by taking financial impediments into close consideration. In most cases, their justifications for asking questions are subjective; by doing so, they inadvertently introduce arbitrariness in an area where the French state endeavors to produce social justice via provisions such as "CMU" ("universal", across the board health coverage). Systematic questioning on a patient's social status can represent a form of supplementary if unconscious symbolic violence toward frequently disqualified persons; what is more, it runs the risk of inducing stereotypes and manifesting prejudice. Only when contextualized does such questioning seem appropriate. On the other hand, when a practitioner misses out on social issues liable to impede care and treatment, he will probably have no "second chance" to address these concerns. Some practitioners have emphasized a need for suitable timing and contextualizing of questions on a patient's social status, and for putting them forward in a climate of trust.

[The local organization of health equity or the mistakes of intersectorality]

In recent years, there has been a new institutional set of developments in France aimed at promoting the adoption of partnership-based, cross-sectoral and modulated health policies based on the health status of the population. Nevertheless, because addressing the challenge of health equity depends largely on the mobilization of a large number of protagonists with very heterogeneous initiatives, interests and values, the conduct of such policies potentially opens up a space for confrontation between those who wish to promote it and those who refuse, challenge, circumvent or neutralize the reconfigurations of public action and the work routines it inevitably induces. This company can therefore be marked by tensions and additional constraints for the actors. In this context, it remains largely conditional.

[Characteristics and health status of homeless women born in France and abroad: Results of Insee-Ined 2012 survey]

BACKGROUND

French national surveys among the homeless population in 2001 and 2012 provided a general description of the homeless beneficiaries of medical and social aids. However, given the increasing number of women in this population, mostly born abroad and accompanied by their children, a descriptive study of homeless women according to the fact of being born in France or abroad was conducted.

METHODS

A probability sample of 1470 French-speaking homeless women was recruited for the Insee-Ined 2012 survey. Socio-demographic characteristics, life trajectories, work and employment over the last 12 months, perceived health, reported morbidity, use of care and medical coverage have been described, comparing homeless women born abroad with those born in France.

RESULTS

Homeless women are young (median age=34 y.), often single (55%), without a partner (71%) and often accompanied by children (52%). The vast majority (60%) reported no salary during the previous 12 months. Housing conditions were less precarious in women born in France, but these women had a more difficult life history, a more unfavorable perception of their health status, and a higher frequency of chronic health problems. Homeless women born abroad seemed to have more precarious conditions of life and more difficulties to access aids and medical coverage. Overall, despite a relatively good availability of medical insurance, homeless women, regardless of the place of birth, often reported health problems, which were not treated.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that homeless women often have to deal with chronic health problems that are not treated. Homeless women born abroad are characterized by more precarious living conditions that women born in France. Although younger, with an overall favorable perception of their health and declaring less often an addiction, their general state of health appears to be as fragile as for women born in France. Actions towards homeless women should be implemented to promote their access to care.

[Socioeconomic inequalities and kidney transplantation]

Studies at the population level must take into account the effect of social insecurity and socioeconomic inequalities on the patient outcomes. Socioeconomic inequalities depend on many determinants that are socially determined. In renal transplantation, these social determinants are not registered in the databases. The European Deprivation Index (EDI) is a composite index of social vulnerability with a French version. The EDI is an ecological measure of deprivation including the individual perception of basic needs for daily life that is called "subjective poverty". The Townsend index, Carstairs index and the Index of Multiple Deprivation are other ecological index available. It has been demonstrated in the United States that socioeconomic indicators of deprivation were associated with both the access to the waiting list for renal transplantation and transplantation failure. In France, socioeconomic deprivation may also affect the access to the waiting list and outcome of transplantation. This article is a review about deprivation and renal transplantation.