Effect of different propofol
infusion methods during ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation on brain functional state indexes and circulatory function in patients with liver cancer.
Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2022;
30:484-490. [DOI:
10.11569/wcjd.v30.i11.484]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
During percutaneous microwave coagulation therapy (PMCT), patients under local anesthesia are prone to body movement because they cannot tolerate high tempera-ture stimulation, which results in microwave needle displacement, so intravenous general anesthesia is required. Propofol is a short-acting intravenous anesthetic widely used in clinical practice. It has the characteristics of fast action, large distribution volume, and high clearance rate, and is widely used for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia.
AIM
To investigate the effect of different propofol infusion methods during ultrasound-guided PMCT on the cerebral functional status indexes and circulatory function in patients with liver cancer.
METHODS
A total of 74 patients with liver cancer treated at our hospital from January 2017 to January 2021 were selected as the research subjects, and they were randomly divided into either a target-controlled infusion group (group A, n = 37) or an intermittent injection group (group B, n = 37). The circulatory function [heart rate (HR) and mean arterial pressure (MAP)] between the two groups was compared before operation (T0), at the beginning of the operation (T1), 5 min after the beginning of the operation (T2), when the temperature of the cancerous focus reached 90 °C (T3), and when awaking (T4) after the operation. Brain function state [wavelet index (WLi), anxiety index (ANXi), and comfort index (CFi)], propofol dosage, recovery time from anesthesia, postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score, cognition mini-mental state examination (MMSE) score, and incidence of adverse reactions were also compared between the two groups.
RESULTS
At T1, T2, and T3, the MAP and HR of group A were significantly higher than those of group B (P < 0.05). At T1, T2, and T3, WLi, ANXi, and CFi of group A were significantly lower than those of group B (P < 0.05). Propofol dosage did not differ significantly between the two groups (P > 0.05). The recovery time from anesthesia in group A was significantly longer than that in group B (P < 0.05); VAS scores and differences at 30 min and 3 h after operation in group A were significantly lower than those in group B (P < 0.05). Compared with the score at 1 d before operation, MMSE scores at 1 and 2 d after operation were significantly decreased. MMSE score of group A was significantly higher than that of group B on the first day after operation (P < 0.05), though the difference in MMSE score between the two groups on the second day after operation was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). There was no respiratory depression in either group, and the incidence of body movement in group A was significantly lower than that in group B (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSION
During PMCT, intermittent intravenous injection and target-controlled infusion of propofol are both safe and effective for liver cancer patients, but the latter has relatively little effect on the brain function of patients, better analgesic effect and maintenance of body circulation stability, less body movement during the operation, and higher safety.
Collapse