Satisfaction with the Injection Experience of a New, Citrate-Free Formulation of Ixekizumab

INTRODUCTION

A new, citrate-free ixekizumab formulation, which is bioequivalent to the original formulation, was associated with significant reduction in injection site pain. This study evaluates patient satisfaction with the first injection experience of citrate-free ixekizumab in a real-world setting.

METHODS

A non-interventional, observational, web-based survey of adults (≥ 18 years) with psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, or axial spondyloarthritis was conducted between August 2022 and March 2023. Patients enrolled in the Taltz US Customer Support Program were identified as receiving either the original ixekizumab or initiating citrate-free ixekizumab. Patients receiving original ixekizumab completed one survey at baseline to assess satisfaction with the formulation and one survey after switching to assess satisfaction, willingness to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab, and formulation preference. Participants previously exposed to ixekizumab completed one survey to assess their satisfaction and willingness to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab. Descriptive and comparative statistics are reported for patients that switched from original to citrate-free ixekizumab (n = 361); and descriptive statistics are reported for patients not previously exposed to ixekizumab (n = 90).

RESULTS

A total of 451 patients were included in the analysis. Significantly more patients were satisfied with their first injection with citrate-free ixekizumab compared to original ixekizumab (83.9% vs. 71.7% respectively; p = 0.0001). Almost all patients who switched from original ixekizumab were definitely or mostly willing to continue using and recommending citrate-free ixekizumab (93.9% and 93.4%, respectively). Additionally, 94.2% of patients who switched from original to citrate-free ixekizumab preferred citrate-free ixekizumab or had no preference. Three-fourths of patients not previously exposed to ixekizumab were satisfied with their first injection with citrate-free ixekizumab and 94.5% were definitely or mostly willing to continue using citrate-free ixekizumab.

CONCLUSION

The citrate-free ixekizumab formulation was preferred and well accepted by most patients who switched from the original ixekizumab formulation. Similar findings were seen for those newly initiating citrate-free ixekizumab.

Ixekizumab Citrate-Free Formulation: Results from Two Clinical Trials

Introduction

Subcutaneous (SC) injection is a common route of drug administration; however, injection site pain (ISP) might create a negative patient experience. We evaluated ISP, bioequivalence, and overall safety of the citrate-free (CF) formulation of ixekizumab, a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that selectively targets interleukin-17A.

Methods

Two phase 1, single-blind studies were conducted in healthy participants. The crossover study A (NCT03848403) evaluated pain intensity on injection as measured by visual analog scale of pain (VAS) scores. Subjects (N = 70) were randomized 1:1:1 at the beginning to three possible treatment sequences and received a 1 mL SC injection of the three formulations sequentially in the abdomen on days 1, 8, and 15, respectively. A mixed-effects repeated measures analysis model was used to analyze VAS score by time post-injection. Study B (NCT04259346) evaluated the bioequivalence of a single 80 mg dose of CF formulation compared to the original commercial formulation. Subjects (N = 245) were randomized 1:1 to either commercial or CF formulation and received a single SC injection into the abdomen, arm, or thigh.

Results

Primary endpoint was achieved in both studies. In study A, least-squares mean (LSM) difference of VAS scores immediately post injection between commercial (n = 61) and CF formulation (n = 63) was − 21.7 (p < 0.0001), indicating a lower degree of pain associated with CF formulation. In study B, bioequivalence of the CF formulation was established as 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric LSM AUC_0–tlast, AUC_0–∞, and C_max between treatments were contained within the prespecified limits of 0.8 and 1.25. Except for less ISP in the CF formulation, overall safety profile was comparable.

Conclusion

Ixekizumab CF formulation proved to be bioequivalent, was associated with less ISP, and had no other notable differences in the safety profile compared to the original commercial formulation.

Trail Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03848403, NCT04259346.

Usability of Prefilled Syringe and Autoinjector for SB4 (An Etanercept Biosimilar) in Patients with Rheumatoid Arthritis

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to compare the usability of subcutaneous administration of SB4 (an etanercept biosimilar) via prefilled syringe (PFS) and autoinjector (AI) based on injection site pain, patient preference, and safety in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

This was an open-label, single-arm, multicenter study to evaluate the usability and safety of the AI and PFS of SB4. Adult patients with RA received two injections of SB4 via the PFS, followed by six injections by the AI every week, up to 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in injection site pain score immediately post-injection from week 1 (PFS) to week 3 (AI). Injection site pain after 15-30 min post-injection, overall impression, and preference for PFS and AI were also assessed. Safety was assessed up to 11 weeks after the first injection.

RESULTS

A total of 54 patients were enrolled and 52 patients (96.3%) completed the 8-week treatment period. The mean difference in pain scores between PFS and AI was - 0.057 and the 95% CI of the difference was [- 0.63, 0.51], which was within the equivalence margin of ± 5. Overall impression of the device slightly favored the AI. Overall preference for the AI was more favorable when compared to the PFS in all categories. Adverse events were mild to moderate and found to be generally consistent with those expected for reference etanercept. There were no deaths or serious adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated comparable usability and safety between the PFS and AI when self-administrated by patients with RA.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT03193957.

FUNDING

Samsung Bioepis.

Decreased Injection Site Pain Associated with Phosphate-Free Etanercept Formulation in Rheumatoid Arthritis or Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Introduction

Etanercept, a tumor necrosis factor inhibitor, is used to treat rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and is administered via subcutaneous injection. Injection site pain (ISP) associated with subcutaneous administration may affect compliance or hinder initiation of prescribed medications. To improve the patient experience, a new phosphate-free formulation of etanercept was evaluated for reduced ISP associated with administration.

Methods

This phase 3b, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, cross-over study compared the prior formulation of etanercept to a phosphate-free formulation. Etanercept-naïve adults with RA or PsA indicated for treatment with etanercept were eligible. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive both etanercept formulations (50 mg) in one of two crossover sequences: prior formulation followed by phosphate-free formulation (sequence AB) or phosphate-free formulation followed by prior formulation (sequence BA) at visits 1 week apart. Patients self-reported ISP using a fit-for-purpose 100-mm visual analog scale within 30 s after injection. Safety outcomes included incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. Mixed-effects analysis of variance model was used to assess ISP, with treatment, study period, sequence, and disease indication as fixed-effect covariates and patient-within-sequence as random effect.

Results

A total of 111 patients enrolled (56 sequence AB; 55 sequence BA). Mean ISP score for prior formulation was 23.1 mm and for phosphate-free formulation was 19.1 mm (mean difference − 4 mm; 95% confidence interval: − 8.0, 0.0; P = 0.048). Patients with the highest ISP scores from the prior formulation (by quartile cut points) had the largest reduction in pain with phosphate-free formulation. Injection site reactions were few in number and similar between formulations; no new safety signals were observed.

Conclusions

The new phosphate-free formulation of etanercept had statistically significantly lower mean pain scores than the prior formulation, with largest pain reductions observed among patients who reported highest pain with the prior formulation.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02986139.

Funding

Amgen Inc, Thousand Oaks, CA USA.

Strategies to decrease injection site pain in botulinum toxin therapy

Botulinum toxin is now used for numerous indications including dystonias, spasticity, cerebral palsy, hyperhidrosis, cosmetics and chronic migraine. It has to be injected into its target tissues thus causing injection site pain. We wanted to compare the efficacy of various analgesic interventions suggested for reduction of injection site pain. In 13 healthy controls, pain thresholds in the fingertips II and III bilaterally were determined by the Mechanical Pain Threshold Test and the Repetitive Pain Stimulation Test at baseline and under nitrous oxide/oxygen, ice spray, local anaesthetic cream and forearm ischaemia. All interventions studied produce statistically significant and robust elevations of the pain threshold in both tests. Nitrous oxide/oxygen had stronger effects than the other interventions, although this superiority was statistically significant only in the Repetitive Pain Stimulation Test and not against ice spray. Also considering duration, localisation and penetration depth of analgesic effects, hyperhidrosis treatment may benefit from nitrous oxide/oxygen, ice spray and local anaesthetic cream. In palmar hyperhidrosis, forearm ischaemia is possible and also reduces botulinum toxin washout. Cosmetic indications may also benefit from nitrous oxide/oxygen and local anaesthetic cream. For botulinum toxin therapy of spasticity, dystonia and tremor, only nitrous oxide/oxygen may offer intramuscular analgesic effect. Its systemic and prolonged effect is also an advantage in injections in several body parts. Future studies are necessary to test the influence of penetration depth and combinations of analgesic interventions.