The predictive value of the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) in the outcome of multi-traumatic patients compared to the estimated Injury Severity Score (eISS)

PURPOSE

The classification of trauma patients in emergency settings is a constant challenge for physicians. However, the Injury Severity Score (ISS) is widely used in developed countries, it may be difficult to perform it in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC). As a result, the ISS was calculated using an estimated methodology that has been described and validated in a high-income country previously. In addition, a simple scoring tool called the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS) was developed recently. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of KTS and estimated ISS (eISS) in order to achieve a valid and efficient scoring system in our resource-limited setting.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study between December 2020 and March 2021 among the multi-trauma patients who presented at the emergency department of Imam Reza hospital, Tabriz, Iran. After obtaining informed consent, all data including age, sex, mechanism of injury, GCS, KTS, eISS, final outcome (including death, morbidity, or discharge), and length of hospital stay were collected and entered into SPSS version 27.0 and analyzed.

RESULTS

381 multi-trauma patients participated in the study. The area under the curve for prediction of mortality (AUC) for KTS was 0.923 (95%CI: 0.888-0.958) and for eISS was 0.910 (95% CI: 0.877-0.944). For the mortality, comparing the AUCs by the Delong test, the difference between areas was not statistically significant (p value = 0.356). The diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) for the prediction of mortality KTS and eISS were 28.27 and 32.00, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In our study population, the KTS has similar accuracy in predicting the mortality of multi-trauma patients compared to the eISS.

Correlation between trauma and injury severity score and prognosis in patients with trauma

Objectives

This study aims to determine the correlation between Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and prognosis in patients with trauma.

Methods

We retrospectively analysed 187 medical records of patients with trauma who presented to the emergency department of a level II trauma centre in East Java, Indonesia, between August and December 2018. We analysed the data, which included demographic characteristics, Glasgow Coma Scale score, systolic blood pressure, respiratory rate, and injury scores of six parts of the body. Spearman's rank correlation was used to determine the correlation among variables.

Results

A total of 181 medical records of patients with trauma were reviewed in this study. Two-third of the patients were male (n = 113, 62.4%). Approximately half of the trauma injuries were caused by road traffic accidents (n = 89, 49.2%); the majority of these injuries resulted from blunt trauma (n = 167, 92.3%). The TRISSes of most of the patients (n = 178, 98.3%) with a good prognosis ranged from 77.1% to 99.7%. There was a statistically significant correlation between trauma, TRISS, and prognosis (p = 0.002 < 0.05), with a positive correlation among variables (r = 0.225).

Conclusion

There was a significant correlation between TRISS and prognosis in patients with trauma.

Validation of international trauma scoring systems in urban trauma centres in India

INTRODUCTION

In the Lower-Middle Income Country setting, we validate trauma severity scoring systems, namely Injury Severity Score (ISS), New Injury Severity Scale (NISS) score, the Kampala Trauma Score (KTS), Revised Trauma Score (RTS) score and the TRauma Injury Severity Score (TRISS) using Indian trauma patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1 September 2013 to 28 February 2015, we conducted a prospective multi-centre observational cohort study of trauma patients in four Indian university hospitals, in three megacities, Kolkata, Mumbai and Delhi. All adult patients presenting to the casualty department with a history of injury and who were admitted to inpatient care were included. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality within 30-days of admission. The sensitivity and specificity of each score to predict inpatient mortality within 30days was assessed by the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Model fit for the performance of individual scoring systems was accomplished by using the Akaike Information criterion (AIC).

RESULTS

In a registry of 8791 adult trauma patients, we had a cohort of 7197 patients eligible for the study. 4091 (56.8%)patients had all five scores available and was the sample for a complete case analysis. Over a 30-day period, the scores (AUC) was TRISS (0.82), RTS (0.81), KTS (0.74), NISS (0.65) and ISS (0.62). RTS was the most parsimonious model with the lowest AIC score. Considering overall mortality, both physiologic scores (RTS, KTS) had better discrimination and goodness-of-fit than ISS or NISS. The ability of all Injury scores to predict early mortality (24h) was better than late mortality (30day).

CONCLUSION

On-admission physiological scores outperformed the more expensive anatomy-based ISS and NISS. The retrospective nature of ISS and TRISS score calculations and incomplete imaging in LMICs precludes its use in the casualty department of LMICs. They will remain useful for outcome comparison across trauma centres. Physiological scores like the RTS and KTS will be the practical score to use in casualty departments in the urban Indian setting, to predict early trauma mortality and improve triage.