Family burden after critical illness: the forgotten caregivers

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of primary caregiver burden in a cohort of family members of critically ill patients admitted to ICU and to identify risk factors related to its development in both the patient and the family member.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort study was conducted for 24 months.

SETTING

Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada.

PATIENTS

The sample was the primary caregivers of all patients with risk factors for development of PICS (Post-Intensive Care Syndrome).

INTERVENTIONS

The follow-up protocol consisted of evaluation 3 months after discharge from the ICU in a specific consultation.

MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST

The scales used in patients were Barthel, SF-12, HADS, Pfeiffer, IES-6 and in relatives the Apgar and Zarit.

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients and caregivers were included in the follow-up. 15 relatives did not complete the follow-up questionnaires and were excluded from the study. The incidence of PICS-F (Family Post Intensive Care Syndrome) defined by the presence of primary caregiver burden in our cohort of patients is 34.6% (n=27), 95% CI 25.0-45.7. The risk factors for the development of caregiver burden are the presence of physical impairment, anxiety or post-traumatic stress in the patient, with no relationship found with the characteristics studied in the family member.

CONCLUSIONS

One out of 3 relatives of patients with risk factors for the development of PICS presents at 3 months caregiver burden. This is related to factors dependent on the patient's state of health.

Patterns of utilization and effects of hospital-specific factors on physical, occupational, and speech therapy for critically ill patients with acute respiratory failure in the USA: results of a 5-year sample

Background

Timely initiation of physical, occupational, and speech therapy in critically ill patients is crucial to reduce morbidity and improve outcomes. Over a 5-year time interval, we sought to determine the utilization of these rehabilitation therapies in the USA.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study utilizing a large, national administrative database including ICU patients from 591 hospitals. Patients over 18 years of age with acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation within the first 2 days of hospitalization and for a duration of at least 48 h were included.

Results

A total of 264,137 patients received invasive mechanical ventilation for a median of 4.0 [2.0–8.0] days. Overall, patients spent a median of 5.0 [3.0–10.0] days in the ICU and 10.0 [7.0–16.0] days in the hospital. During their hospitalization, 66.5%, 41.0%, and 33.2% (95% CI = 66.3–66.7%, 40.8–41.2%, 33.0–33.4%, respectively) received physical, occupational, and speech therapy. While on mechanical ventilation, 36.2%, 29.7%, and 29.9% (95% CI = 36.0–36.4%, 29.5–29.9%, 29.7–30.1%) received physical, occupational, and speech therapy. In patients receiving therapy, their first physical therapy session occurred on hospital day 5 [3.0–8.0] and hospital day 6 [4.0–10.0] for occupational and speech therapy. Of all patients, 28.6% (95% CI = 28.4–28.8%) did not receive physical, occupational, or speech therapy during their hospitalization. In a multivariate analysis, patients cared for in the Midwest and at teaching hospitals were more likely to receive physical, occupational, and speech therapy (all P < 0.05). Of patients with identical covariates receiving therapy, there was a median of 61%, 187%, and 70% greater odds of receiving physical, occupational, and speech therapy, respectively, at one randomly selected hospital compared with another (median odds ratio 1.61, 2.87, 1.70, respectively).

Conclusions

Physical, occupational, and speech therapy are not routinely delivered to critically ill patients, particularly while on mechanical ventilation in the USA. The utilization of these therapies varies according to insurance coverage, geography, and hospital teaching status, and at a hospital level.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13054-019-2467-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.