1
|
Shin SH, Lee KS, Koo KC, Cho KS, Hong CH, Chung BH, Ryoo HS, Ryu JH, Kim YB, Yang SO, Lee JK, Jung TY, Yoo JW. Effects of resection volume on postoperative micturition symptoms and retreatment after transurethral resection of the prostate. World J Urol 2023; 41:3065-3074. [PMID: 37787942 PMCID: PMC10632267 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04628-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite advances in technology, such as advent of laser enucleation and minimally invasive surgical therapies, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) remains the most widely performed surgical technique for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). We evaluated resection volume (RV)-derived parameters and analyzed the effect of RV on post-TURP outcomes. METHODS This observational study used data from patients who underwent TURP at two institutions between January 2011 and December 2021 Data from patients with previous BPH surgical treatment, incomplete data, and underlying disease affecting voiding function were excluded. The collected data included age, prostate-specific antigen, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)- and uroflowmetry-derived parameters, RV, perioperative laboratory values, perioperative International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), follow-up period, retreatment requirements and interval between the first TURP and retreatment. RESULTS In 268 patients without prior BPH medication, there were no differences in prostate volume (PV), transitional zone volume (TZV), or RV according to IPSS. A total of 60 patients started retreatment, including medical or surgical treatment, within the follow-up period. There was a significant difference in RV/PV between the groups without and with retreatment respectively (0.56 and 0.37; p = 0.008). However, preoperative TRUS- and uroflowmetry-derived parameters did not differ between the two groups. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that RV (p = 0.003) and RV/TZV (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with differences in perioperative IPSS. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, only RV/PV was correlated with retreatment (p = 0.010). CONCLUSION Maximal TURP leads to improved postoperative outcomes and reduced retreatment rate, it may gradually become a requirement rather than an option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Han Shin
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Suk Lee
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyo Chul Koo
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kang Su Cho
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Hee Hong
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Byung Ha Chung
- Department of Urology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Soo Ryoo
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Jae Hyun Ryu
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Yun Beom Kim
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung Ok Yang
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Kee Lee
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Young Jung
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Woo Yoo
- Department of Urology, Veterans Health Service Medical Center, 53 Jinhwangdo-Ro 61-Gil, Gangdong-Gu, Seoul, 05368, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sapoval M, Thiounn N, Descazeaud A, Déan C, Ruffion A, Pagnoux G, Duarte RC, Robert G, Petitpierre F, Karsenty G, Vidal V, Murez T, Vernhet-Kovacsik H, de la Taille A, Kobeiter H, Mathieu R, Heautot JF, Droupy S, Frandon J, Barry Delongchamps N, Korb-Savoldelli V, Durand-Zaleski I, Pereira H, Chatellier G. Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial. Lancet Reg Health Eur 2023; 31:100672. [PMID: 37415648 PMCID: PMC10320610 DOI: 10.1016/j.lanepe.2023.100672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/07/2023] [Indexed: 07/08/2023]
Abstract
Background Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE and medical treatment. Methods A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined by International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) > 11 and quality of life (QoL) > 3, and BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy ([CT], oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, IPSS and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure. The primary outcome was the 9-month IPSS change. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971. Findings Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups, respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was -10.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.8 to -8.3) and -5.7 (95% CI: -7.5 to -3.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (-4.4 [95% CI: -6.9 to -1.9], p = 0.0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8.2 (95% CI: 2.9-13.5) and -2.8 (95% CI: -8.4 to 2.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. No treatment-related AE or hospitalisation was noticed. After 9 months, 5 and 18 patients had invasive prostate re-treatment in the PAE and CT group, respectively. Interpretation In patients with BPH ≥50 ml and bothersome LUTS resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy, PAE provides more urinary and sexual symptoms benefit than CT up to 24 months. Funding French Ministry of Health and a complementary grant from Merit Medical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Sapoval
- Université de Paris Cité, PARCC - INSERM Unité-970, Paris, France
- Department of Vascular and Oncological Interventional Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Nicolas Thiounn
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Aurélien Descazeaud
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Limoges, Department of Urology, Limoges, France
| | - Carole Déan
- Department of Vascular and Oncological Interventional Radiology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Alain Ruffion
- Department of Urology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France
- Université Lyon 1, Faculté de médecine Lyon Sud, Equipe 2 - Centre d’Innovation en Cancérologie de Lyon (EA 3738 CICLY), Lyon, France
| | - Gaële Pagnoux
- Department of Uroradiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Ricardo Codas Duarte
- Department of Urology and Transplantation, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - Grégoire Robert
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Department of Urology, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Francois Petitpierre
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Imaging, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gilles Karsenty
- Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Hôpital de la Conception, Aix-Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Vincent Vidal
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Timone, Interventional Radiology Section, Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Marseille, France
- Aix-Marseille Université, LiiE, CERIMED, Marseille, France
| | - Thibaut Murez
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, Montpellier, France
| | - Hélène Vernhet-Kovacsik
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hôpital Arnaud-de-Villeneuve, Montpellier, France
| | - Alexandre de la Taille
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
| | - Hicham Kobeiter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, Université Paris Est, Créteil, France
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Department of Urology, Rennes, France
| | - Jean-Francois Heautot
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rennes, Vascular Medicine Unit, Department of Radiology, Hôpital Pontchaillou, Rennes, France
| | - Stéphane Droupy
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nîmes, Department of Urology and Andrology, Université de Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| | - Julien Frandon
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire De Nîmes, Department of Medical Imaging, Université de Montpellier, Nîmes, France
- Medical Imaging Group Nîmes, IMAGINE, Nîmes, France
| | - Nicolas Barry Delongchamps
- Université de Paris Cité, Inserm Unit U1151, Paris, France
- Department of Urology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France
| | - Virginie Korb-Savoldelli
- Department of Pharmacy, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Pharmacie, Chatenay-Malabry, France
| | - Isabelle Durand-Zaleski
- Université de Paris Cité, CRESS, INSERM UMR1153, INRA, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital de l'Hôtel Dieu, Université Paris Est Créteil, URCEco, Paris, France
| | - Helena Pereira
- INSERM, Centre d'investigation Clinique 1418 Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | - Gilles Chatellier
- INSERM, Centre d'investigation Clinique 1418 Épidémiologie Clinique, Paris, France
- Clinical Research Unit, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Theurich AT, Leistritz L, Leucht K, Franiel T, Teichgräber U, Foller S, Grimm MO. Influence of Prostate Artery Embolization on Different Qualities of Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Due to Benign Prostatic Obstruction. Eur Urol Focus 2022; 8:1323-1330. [PMID: 35125344 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.01.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is an increasingly used minimally invasive treatment for lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic obstruction (BPO) OBJECTIVE: To analyze the impact of PAE on voiding and storage symptoms. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Between July 2014 and May 2019, 351 consecutive men with BPO who underwent PAE were included in a single-center study. INTERVENTION PAE is an interventional radiological procedure embolizing the prostatic arteries with microspheres. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The primary endpoint represented assessment of the International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 mo after PAE. Secondary endpoints comprised assessment of IPSS quality of life (QoL), International Index of Erectile Function, peak urinary flow rate, postvoid residual volume, prostate volume, and prostate-specific antigen at the same time points. Data were analyzed using standard statistical methods, generalized estimating equations (symptom improvement over time as odds ratios), and McNemar-Bowker test (degree of improvement compared between symptoms). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Clinical success rates for PAE were 68%, 73%, and 66% at 1, 12, and 24 mo, respectively. The median IPSS improved significantly from 22 to 10 points after 2 yr (p < 0.001). Storage (-50%) and voiding (-58%) symptoms improved similarly (each p < 0.001), with nocturia decreasing least frequently but significantly (p < 0.001). After 1 and 2 yr, 35% (95% confidence interval [CI] 29-41%) and 30% (95% CI 21-40%) of patients reported alleviated storage, and 39% (95% CI 33-45%) and 38% (95% CI 29-49%) reported alleviated voiding symptoms, respectively. QoL improved from 5 to 2 points (p < 0.001). The main limitation is the number of patients lost during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS PAE significantly improved voiding and storage symptoms to a similar extent. This study may aid in counseling patients about this minimally invasive BPO treatment. PATIENT SUMMARY Prostate artery embolization (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment option for patients with voiding and storage symptoms from benign prostate enlargement. Our analysis shows that PAE improves relevant lower urinary tract symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Tabea Theurich
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Lutz Leistritz
- Institute of Medical Statistics, Computer and Data Sciences, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Katharina Leucht
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Tobias Franiel
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulf Teichgräber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Susan Foller
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany
| | - Marc-Oliver Grimm
- Department of Urology, Friedrich-Schiller University, Jena University Hospital, Jena, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|