The Impact of Laparoscopic Intraperitoneal Instillation of Ropivacaine in Enhancing Respiratory Recovery and Reducing Acute Postoperative Pain in Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Double-Blinded Randomised Control; RELiEVE Trial

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic intraperitoneal instillation of local anaesthetic in bariatric surgery proven to reduce postoperative pain. Limited data are available regarding the use of instillation ropivacaine and its impact on the recovery of respiratory effort. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of laparoscopic intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine in reducing acute postoperative pain and enhancing the recovery of respiratory effort in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This double-blinded RCT enrolled 110 patients who underwent laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz UKM from November 2020 to May 2021. Any patients with previous abdominal surgery, chronic kidney disease, or liver disease were excluded. The patients were randomised into two groups: (i) the IPLA group which received ropivacaine intraperitoneal instillation at the dissected left crus and (ii) the placebo group (sterile water instillation). Perioperative analgesia was standardised. The first 24-h postoperative pain was assessed using a VAS. The respiratory effort was assessed using incentive spirometry simultaneously.

RESULTS

Total of 110 patients were recruited. The VAS score was lower with an enhanced recovery of respiratory effort in the local anaesthetic group compared to the placebo group (P < 0.05) within the first 24 h postoperatively. In addition, the placebo group required additional postoperative analgesia (P < 0.05). No side effects were reported with the use of intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine.

CONCLUSION

The use of intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine in laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy is recommended as it is safe, effectively reduces acute postoperative pain, and enhances the recovery of respiratory effort postoperatively.

Intraperitoneal Instillation of Local Anesthetic (IPILA) in Bariatric Surgery and the Effect on Post-operative Pain Scores: a Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Effective analgesia after bariatric procedures is vital as it can reduce post-operative opioid use. This leads to less nausea which may be associated with shorter post-operative length of stay (LOS). Understanding analgesic requirements in patients with obesity is important due to the varied physiology and increased number of comorbidities.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of intraperitoneal instillation of local anesthetic (IPILA) to reduce opioid requirements in patients undergoing laparoscopic bariatric surgery.

METHODS

A double-blinded randomized control trial was conducted to compare intraperitoneal instillation of ropivacaine to normal saline in 104 patients undergoing bariatric surgery. The primary endpoint was pain in recovery with secondary endpoints at 1, 2, 4, 6, 24, and 48 h post-operatively. Further endpoints were post-operative analgesic use and LOS. Safety endpoints included unexpected reoperation or readmission, complications, and mortality.

RESULTS

There were 54 patients in the placebo arm and 50 in the IPILA. Pain scores were significantly lower in the IPILA group both at rest (p = 0.04) and on movement (p = 0.02) in recovery with no difference seen at subsequent time points. Equally, IPILA was independently associated with reducing severe post-operative pain at rest and movement (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.69, p = 0.007 and aOR 0.25, 95% CI 0.09-0.62, p = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant difference in LOS, opioid use, antiemetic use, morbidity, or mortality between the intervention and placebo groups.

CONCLUSION

The administration of ropivacaine intraperitoneally during laparoscopic bariatric surgery reduces post-operative pain in the recovery room but does not reduce opioid use nor LOS.

Randomized controlled study of intraincisional infiltration versus intraperitoneal instillation of standardized dose of ropivacaine 0.2% in post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain: Do we really need high doses of local anesthetics-time to rethink!

BACKGROUND

Earlier studies done to compare the efficacy of use of local anesthetics at intraperitoneal location versus intraincisional use had utilized equal amount of drugs at the two locations, usually 10-20 ml. Using this large amount of drug in the small space of intraincisional location as compared to similar amount of drug in large intraperitoneal space created an inadvertent bias in favor of patients receiving the drug intraincisionally so these patients naturally experienced less pain.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To conduct a randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled study by standardizing dose of local anesthetic, to compare the effectiveness of intraperitoneal against intraincisional use of ropivacaine 0.2% for post-laparoscopic cholecystectomy pain relief.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

294 patients underwent elective 4-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients were triple blindly randomized. All patients received ~ 23 ml of solution, of which 20 ml was given intraperitoneally (1 ml/cm; 16 ml along right hemi-dome and 4 ml in gall bladder fossa) and ~ 3 ml intraincisionally (1 ml/cm of length of incision). Solution was either normal saline or drug (0.2% ropivacaine) depending on the group [controls (n = 86), intraperitoneal group (n = 100), and intraincisional group (n = 108)]. 5 different pain scales were used for assessment of overall pain. Pain scores were assessed at 5 points of time.

RESULTS

Patients in intraincisional group showed significantly less overall pain and rescue analgesia requirement (p < 0.05). Intraincisional group showed significantly less overall pain (p < 0.05) as compared to intraperitoneal group; however, use of rescue analgesia was comparable in the two groups (p > 0.05); and shoulder pain was significantly less in intraperitoneal group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The intraincisional use of injection ropivacaine at its minimum concentration of 0.2% in minimal doses of 1 ml/cm at the end of procedure provides significantly more post-operative analgesia as compared to intraperitoneal group and controls. However, for controlling shoulder pain, the use of intraperitoneal ropivacaine is desirable.

Effects of Intraperitoneal Local Anaesthetics Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine versus Placebo on Postoperative Pain after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomised Double Blind Study

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy (LC) is the most frequently performed elective daycare surgery and provision of postoperative pain relief is of importance. After laparoscopic cholecystectomy shoulder and abdominal pain causes considerable distress. Visceral pain during coughing, respiration and mobilization increases morbidity, hospital stay and costs.

AIM

To compare the analgesic efficacy of intraperitoneally instilled equipotent concentrations of bupivacaine and ropivacaine versus placebo in relieving postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy when used as a part of multimodal analgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this randomised, prospective, double blind, placebo controlled study, 90 ASA Class I or II patients were randomly divided into three groups of 30 each. Group S received intraperitoneal infiltration with 35 ml of 0.9% normal saline, Group B with 35 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine and Group R with 35 ml of 0.375% ropivacaine. All groups received standard general endotracheal anaesthesia and analgesia with IV paracetamol 15 mg/kg and diclofenac 1.5 mg/kg. Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of analgesia at rest and on cough/movement, duration of analgesia, haemodynamic parameters, need for a rescue analgesic (IV tramadol 1 mg/kg) was recorded and adverse effects of procedure and drugs if any were monitored. Data was analysed with SPSS statistical software version 21.0. One way ANOVA or the Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare continuous data across all three groups as appropriate. Subsequent analysis of continuous data between two groups was achieved by Tukey's post hoc test. Significance was accepted as p<0.05.

RESULTS

The mean NRS was <5 till only four hours in Group S, till eight hours in Group B and till 16 hours in Group R. The duration of analgesia was 13.47±1.38 hours in Group R, 7.93±1.44 hours in Group B and 4.47±0.86 hours in Group S.

CONCLUSION

Intraperitoneal infiltration of LA significantly reduces pain intensity scores in the early postoperative period after LC surgery and helps in improving the postoperative recovery profile and outcome. This makes LC surgery more amenable to day care surgical setup. Ropivacaine (0.375%) is more efficacious, longer acting with a higher intensity of postoperative analgesia than bupivacaine (0.25%).