Determining respiratory rate using measured expiratory time constant: A prospective observational study

PURPOSE

Potential negative implications associated with high respiratory rate (RR) are intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi) generation, cardiovascular depression and possibly ventilator induced lung injury. Despite these negative consequences, optimal RR remains largely unknown. We hypothesized that without consideration of dynamics of lung emptying (i.e., the expiratory time constant [RC_EXP]) clinician settings of RR may exceed the frequency needed for optimal lung emptying.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective multicenter observational study measured RC_EXP in 56 intensive care patients receiving pressure-controlled ventilation. We compared set RR to the one predicted with RC_EXP (RR_P). Also, the subgroup of patients with prolonged RC_EXP was analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall, the absolute mean difference between the set RR and RR_P was 2.8 bpm (95% CI: 2.3-3.2). Twenty-nine (52%) patients had prolonged RC_EXP (>0.8 s), mean difference between set RR and RR_P of 3.1 bpm (95% CI: 2.3-3.8; p < 0.0001) and significantly higher PEEPi compared to those with RC_EXP ≤ 0.8 s: 4.4 (95% CI: 3.6-5.2) versus 1.5 (95% CI: 0.9-2.0) cmH₂O respectively, p < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of RR_P based on measured RC_EXP revealed that the clinician-set RR exceeded that predicted by RC_EXP in the majority of patients. Measuring RC_EXP appears to be a useful variable for adjusting the RR during mandatory mechanical ventilation.

Dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure in ARDS patients

Background

In ARDS patients, changes in respiratory mechanical properties and ventilatory settings can cause incomplete lung deflation at end-expiration. Both can promote dynamic hyperinflation and intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). The aim of this study was to investigate, in a large population of ARDS patients, the presence of intrinsic PEEP, possible associated factors (patients’ characteristics and ventilator settings), and the effects of two different external PEEP levels on the intrinsic PEEP.

Methods

We made a secondary analysis of published data. Patients were ventilated with a tidal volume of 6–8 mL/kg of predicted body weight, sedated, and paralyzed. After a recruitment maneuver, a PEEP trial was run at 5 and 15 cmH₂O, and partitioned mechanics measurements were collected after 20 min of stabilization. Lung computed tomography scans were taken at 5 and 45 cmH₂O. Patients were classified into two groups according to whether or not they had intrinsic PEEP at the end of an expiratory pause.

Results

We enrolled 217 sedated, paralyzed patients: 87 (40%) had intrinsic PEEP with a median of 1.1 [1.0–2.3] cmH₂O at 5 cmH₂O of PEEP. The intrinsic PEEP significantly decreased with higher PEEP (1.1 [1.0–2.3] vs 0.6 [0.0–1.0] cmH₂O; p < 0.001). The applied tidal volume was significantly lower (480 [430–540] vs 520 [445–600] mL at 5 cmH₂O of PEEP; 480 [430–540] vs 510 [430–590] mL at 15 cmH₂O) in patients with intrinsic PEEP, while the respiratory rate was significantly higher (18 [15–20] vs 15 [13–19] bpm at 5 cmH₂O of PEEP; 18 [15–20] vs 15 [13–19] bpm at 15 cmH₂O). At both PEEP levels, the total airway resistance and compliance of the respiratory system were not different in patients with and without intrinsic PEEP. The total lung gas volume and lung recruitability were also not different between patients with and without intrinsic PEEP (respectively 961 [701–1535] vs 973 [659–1433] mL and 15 [0–32] % vs 22 [0–36] %).

Conclusions

In sedated, paralyzed ARDS patients without a known obstructive disease, the amount of intrinsic PEEP during lung-protective ventilation is negligible and does not influence respiratory mechanical properties.

Expiratory flow-limitation in mechanically ventilated patients: A risk for ventilator-induced lung injury?

Expiratory flow limitation (EFL), that is the inability of expiratory flow to increase in spite of an increase of the driving pressure, is a common and unrecognized occurrence during mechanical ventilation in a variety of intensive care unit conditions. Recent evidence suggests that the presence of EFL is associated with an increase in mortality, at least in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients, and in pulmonary complications in patients undergoing surgery. EFL is a major cause of intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPi), which in ARDS patients is heterogeneously distributed, with a consequent increase of ventilation/perfusion mismatch and reduction of arterial oxygenation. Airway collapse is frequently concomitant to the presence of EFL. When airways close and reopen during tidal ventilation, abnormally high stresses are generated that can damage the bronchiolar epithelium and uncouple small airways from the alveolar septa, possibly generating the small airways abnormalities detected at autopsy in ARDS. Finally, the high stresses and airway distortion generated downstream the choke points may contribute to parenchymal injury, but this possibility is still unproven. PEEP application can abolish EFL, decrease PEEPi heterogeneity, and limit recruitment/derecruitment. Whether increasing PEEP up to EFL disappearance is a useful criterion for PEEP titration can only be determined by future studies.

[Effect of neurally adjusted ventilatory assist on trigger of mechanical ventilation in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients with intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure]

Objective: To compare the trigger delay and work of trigger between neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) and pressure support ventilation (PSV) in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) patients with intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) during mechanical ventilation. Methods: AECOPD patients with intrinsic PEEP (PEEPi) greater than or equal to 3 cmH(2)O (1 cmH(2)O=0.098 kPa) were enrolled during invasive mechanical ventilation. Subjects were ventilated with low, medium and high pressure under either NAVA or PSV mode. Servo Tracker software continuously recorded the waveform of ventilator and respiratory mechanics indexes (including respiratory frequency, inspiratory tidal volume (Vti), minute ventilation volume (VE), peak airway pressure (PIP), inspiratory time), and calculated trigger and expiratory conversion delay time, work of trigger and total work of breath. Results: A total of 14 AECOPD patients were enrolled with the average PEEPi (4.3±1.3) cmH(2)O. PSV inspiratory trigger delay time was positively correlated with PEEPi (r=0.913, P<0.05). Compared with PSV, NAVA significantly decreased trigger delay time in low, medium and high pressure level groups [(48±17) ms vs. (167±86) ms, (63±65) ms vs. (247±240) ms, (63±49) ms vs. (342±192) ms,respectively all P<0.05]. Similar results were shown as to work of trigger [(0.92±0.36) μV∙s vs. (1.22±0.70) μV∙s, (1.08±0.51) μV∙s vs. (1.62±1.25) μV∙s, (1.20±0.96) μV∙s vs. (2.29±1.02) μV∙s, all P<0.05]. Trigger delay time increased according to the increase of pressure level in PSV mode. Conclusion: The presence of PEEPi in AECOPD patients leads to obvious trigger delay under PSV mode, which is positively correlated with PEEPi level. NAVA significantly reduces trigger delay time and work of trigger compared with PSV mode.