Predictors, Patterns, and Timing of Recurrence Provide Insight into the Disease Biology of Invasive Carcinomas Arising in Association with Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neoplasms

OBJECTIVES

To identify predictors, patterns, and timing of recurrence after resection of invasive carcinomas arising in association with an IPMN.

BACKGROUND

Postoperative management of an invasive carcinoma arising in association with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN), a biologically distinct entity from PanIN-derived pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), remains largely based on guidelines for PanIN-derived PDAC. To minimize treatment failure and inform disease-specific management, cancer recurrence must be better characterized.

METHODS

Patients were identified from a prospectively maintained registry between 1996 and 2018. Predictors of recurrence were evaluated by employing Cox regression models to determine risk-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). The patterns and timing of recurrence were recognized and compared utilizing a log-rank test, respectively.

RESULTS

Of the 213 patients included, 92 (43.2%) recurred with a median RFS of 23.7 months (16.7-30.7). The predominant pattern of recurrence included any systemic (65.2%). The median time to local recurrence was longer than systemic (21.6 versus 11.4 months, p = 0.05). Poor differentiation [HR: 3.01, 95%CI (1.06-8.61)] and nodal disease [N1, HR: 2.23, 95%CI (1.12-4.60); and N2, HR: 5.67 95%CI (2.93-10.99)] emerged as independent predictors of systemic recurrence. For local-specific recurrences, poor differentiation [HR: 3.73, 95%CI (1.04-13.45)] and an R1 margin [high-grade dysplasia or invasive carcinoma; HR: 2.66, 95%CI (1.14-6.21)] emerged as independent predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The predominant pattern of recurrence after resection of invasive carcinomas arising in association with IPMNs is systemic, and occurs earlier than local recurrence. Poor differentiation and nodal disease are associated with systemic recurrence while poor differentiation and an R1 margin are associated with local recurrence. Future studies should investigate the role of systemic (chemotherapy) versus local (radiation) therapies and surveillance strategies in a personalized manner.

Impact of adjuvant therapy in patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas

BACKGROUND

There is limited data on the efficacy of adjuvant therapy (AT) in patients with invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms of the pancreas (IPMN). This single center retrospective cohort study aims to assess the impact of AT on survival in these patients.

METHODS

Patients undergoing surgery for invasive IPMN between 1993 and 2018 were included in the study. We compared the clinicopathologic features and evaluated overall survival (OS) using multivariate Cox regression adjusting for adjuvant therapy, age, T and N stage, perineural and lymphovascular invasion. We also assessed survival differences between surgery alone and AT in node negative (N0) and node positive (N+) subgroups.

RESULTS

103 patients were included in the study; 69 underwent surgery alone while 34 also received AT. Patients in the AT group were significantly younger, presented at higher T and N stages and had more perineural and lymphovascular invasion. Median OS in the surgery alone group was 134 months and 65 months in the AT group, p = 0.052. On multivariate analysis, AT was not associated with improved OS; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.03 (0.52-2.05). In N0 patients, compared to surgery alone, AT was associated with a worse median OS (65 vs 167 months, p = 0.03), whereas in N+ patients there was a non-significant improvement (50.5 vs 20.4 months, p = 0.315).

CONCLUSION

AT did not improve survival in the overall cohort even after multivariate analysis. N0 patients have excellent survival, and AT should probably be avoided in them, whereas it may be considered in patients with N+ disease.

Successful treatment with conversion surgery following chemoradiotherapy for unresectable invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm

INTRODUCTION

Recent advances in chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have enabled the use of conversion surgery in selected patients with initially unresectable pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma after a favorable response to preoperative treatment. However, conversion surgery for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) has not been reported.

CASE REPORT

A 63-year-old man was referred to our hospital for invasive IPMN treatment. Computed tomography revealed a multilocular tumor of 7.2 × 5.8 cm in diameter, which surrounded approximately 180° of the superior mesenteric artery and totally occluded the superior mesenteric vein (SMV). He was diagnosed with unresectable invasive IPMN. CRT was performed using four cycles of S-1 (100 mg/day) based on body surface area for 14 days every 3 weeks plus gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m² on days 8 and 15 with concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions). Response to chemotherapy revealed partial response according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors; subsequently, subtotal stomach-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy with SMV resection was performed. The postoperative course was uneventful. Four courses of adjuvant chemotherapy with TS-1 100 mg / day were administered postoperatively. At 5 years and 9 months after initiating treatment, the patient was alive without recurrence.

Resectable invasive IPMN versus sporadic pancreatic adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas: Should these two different diseases receive the same treatment? A matched comparison study of the French Surgical Association (AFC)

PURPOSE

To compare survival and impact of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IIPMN) and sporadic pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC).

METHODS

From 2005 to 2012, 240 patients underwent pancreatectomy for IIPMN and 1327 for PDAC. Exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant treatment, pancreatic resection other than PD, vascular resection, carcinoma in situ, or <11 examined lymph nodes. Thus, 82 IIPMN and 506 PDAC were eligible for the present study. Finally, The IIPMN group was matched 1:2 to compose the PDAC group according to TNM disease stage, perineural invasion, lymph node ratio, and margin status.

RESULTS

There was no difference in patient's characteristics, intraoperative parameters, postoperative outcomes, and histologic parameters. Overall survival and disease-free survival times were comparable between the 2 groups. In each group, overall survival time was significantly poorer in patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.03 for the IIPMN group; p = 0.03 for the PDAC group). In lymph-node negative patients of the IIPMN group, adjuvant chemotherapy did not have any significant impact on overall survival time (OR = 0.57; 95% CI [0.24-1.33]). Considering the whole population (i.e. patients with IIPMN and PDAC; n = 246), patients who did not achieve adjuvant chemotherapy had poorer survival (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The courses of IIPMN and PDAC were similar after an optimized stage-to-stage comparison. Adjuvant chemotherapy was efficient in both groups. However, in lymph node negative patients, adjuvant chemotherapy seemed not to have a significant impact.

Pancreatic resection for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm- a thirteen-year single center experience

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to review our results for pancreatic resection in patients with intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) with and without associated carcinoma.

METHODS

A total of 54 patients undergoing pancreatic resection for IPMN in a single university surgical center (Medical University of Graz) were reviewed retrospectively. Their survival rates were compared to those of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Twenty-four patients exhibit non-invasive IPMN and thirty patients invasive IPMN with associated carcinoma. The mean age is 67 (+/-11) years, 43 % female. Surgical strategies include classical or pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure (n = 30), distal (n = 13) or total pancreatectomy (n = 11), and additional portal venous resection in three patients (n = 3). Median intensive care stay is three days (range 1 - 87), median in hospital stay is 23 days (range 7 - 87). Thirty-day mortality is 3.7 %. Median follow up is 42 months (range 0 - 127). One-, five- and ten-year overall actuarial survival is 87 %; 84 % and 51 % respectively. Median overall survival is 120 months. Patients with non-invasive IPMN have significantly better survival than patients with invasive IPMN and IPMN-associated carcinoma (p < 0.008). In the subgroup of invasive IPMN with associated carcinoma, a positive nodal state, perineural invasion as well as lymphovascular infiltration are associated with poor outcome (p < 0.0001; <0.0001 and =0.001, respectively). Elevated CA 19-9(>37 U/l) as well as elevated lipase (>60 U/l) serum levels are associated with unfavorable outcome (p = 0.009 and 0.018; respectively). Patients operated for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma show significantly shorter long-term survival than patients with IPMN associated carcinoma (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term outcome after pancreatic resection for non-invasive IPMN is excellent. Outcome after resection for invasive IPMN with invasive carcinoma is significantly better than for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. In low- and intermediate risk IPMN with no clear indication for immediate surgical resection, a watchful waiting strategy should be evaluated carefully against surgical treatment individually for each patient.

Management implications of resection margin histology in patients undergoing resection for IPMN: A meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

IPMN is a relatively new clinical entity and surgeons are continuing to develop their understanding of this complex pathology. Little is known of the natural disease process post-resection of an IPMN, particularly the impact of gland histology and margin status on the chance of recurrence and survival in benign and invasive IPMN.

METHODS

An online search was conducted to evaluate and include those studies which reported on gland histology, margin status and disease recurrence in resected benign and malignant IPMN. A Meta analysis was then performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

The chance of recurrence in non-invasive margin positive IPMN is similar to margin negative IPMN. The chance of recurrence is higher in invasive gland IPMN compared to non-invasive gland. The vast majority of recurrences occurred in patients with positive margins demonstrating invasion.

CONCLUSION

All patients with intra- or post-operative evidence of invasive carcinoma at the resection margin should undergo further resection to achieve a negative margin. Patients with evidence of IPMN at the transaction margin (even with changes of high grade dysplasia/CIS) may not achieve any benefit from further resection. Patients with recurrence in benign/non-invasive IPMN should undergo re-resection, whereas patients with recurrence in invasive IPMN should not.