Light Response Curves in Land Plants

Light is the driving force for photosynthesis. Two techniques are commonly employed to help characterize the relationship between the light environment and photosynthesis in plants.Chlorophyll a fluorescence analysis is used to examine both the capacity for and the efficiency of the conversion of absorbed light into energy for photosynthesis. Additionally, gas exchange analysis is used to assess the utilization of that energy for carbon fixation. These techniques are used either in isolation or in combination to acquire light response curves that measure the response of the plant to sequential changes in irradiance. Light response curves can help users understand photosynthetic mechanisms, evaluate how plants respond to light conditions, or assess the extent of physiological plasticity within plants. In this chapter, we provide a generalized method for acquiring light response curves suitable for both chlorophyll a fluorescence and gas exchange techniques using commercially available apparatus. Depending on the equipment available, these methods can be applied individually or combined to acquire data simultaneously. The methods are broadly applicable to most land plants but are ideally suited to help those that are unfamiliar with these techniques.

Lighting the light reactions of photosynthesis by means of redox-responsive genetically encoded biosensors for photosynthetic intermediates

Oxygenic photosynthesis involves light and dark phases. In the light phase, photosynthetic electron transport provides reducing power and energy to support the carbon assimilation process. It also contributes signals to defensive, repair, and metabolic pathways critical for plant growth and survival. The redox state of components of the photosynthetic machinery and associated routes determines the extent and direction of plant responses to environmental and developmental stimuli, and therefore, their space- and time-resolved detection in planta becomes critical to understand and engineer plant metabolism. Until recently, studies in living systems have been hampered by the inadequacy of disruptive analytical methods. Genetically encoded indicators based on fluorescent proteins provide new opportunities to illuminate these important issues. We summarize here information about available biosensors designed to monitor the levels and redox state of various components of the light reactions, including NADP(H), glutathione, thioredoxin, and reactive oxygen species. Comparatively few probes have been used in plants, and their application to chloroplasts poses still additional challenges. We discuss advantages and limitations of biosensors based on different principles and propose rationales for the design of novel probes to estimate the NADP(H) and ferredoxin/flavodoxin redox poise, as examples of the exciting questions that could be addressed by further development of these tools. Genetically encoded fluorescent biosensors are remarkable tools to monitor the levels and/or redox state of components of the photosynthetic light reactions and accessory pathways. Reducing equivalents generated at the photosynthetic electron transport chain in the form of NADPH and reduced ferredoxin (FD) are used in central metabolism, regulation, and detoxification of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Redox components of these pathways whose levels and/or redox status have been imaged in plants using biosensors are highlighted in green (NADPH, glutathione, H2O2, thioredoxins). Analytes with available biosensors not tried in plants are shown in pink (NADP+). Finally, redox shuttles with no existing biosensors are circled in light blue. APX, ASC peroxidase; ASC, ascorbate; DHA, dehydroascorbate; DHAR, DHA reductase; FNR, FD-NADP+ reductase; FTR, FD-TRX reductase; GPX, glutathione peroxidase; GR, glutathione reductase; GSH, reduced glutathione; GSSG, oxidized glutathione; MDA, monodehydroascorbate; MDAR, MDA reductase; NTRC, NADPH-TRX reductase C; OAA, oxaloacetate; PRX, peroxiredoxin; PSI, photosystem I; PSII: photosystem II; SOD, superoxide dismutase; TRX, thioredoxin.

Enhanced function of non-photoinhibited photosystem II complexes upon PSII photoinhibition

Light induced photosystem (PS)II photoinhibition inactivates and irreversibly damages the reaction center protein(s) but the light harvesting complexes continue the collection of light energy. Here we addressed the consequences of such a situation on thylakoid light harvesting and electron transfer reactions. For this purpose, Arabidopsis thaliana leaves were subjected to investigation of the function and regulation of the photosynthetic machinery after a distinct portion of PSII centers had experienced photoinhibition in the presence and absence of Lincomycin (Lin), a commonly used agent to block the repair of damaged PSII centers. In the absence of Lin, photoinhibition increased the relative excitation of PSII and decreased NPQ, together enhancing the electron transfer from still functional PSII centers to PSI. In contrast, in the presence of Lin, PSII photoinhibition increased the relative excitation of PSI and led to strong oxidation of the electron transfer chain. We hypothesize that plants are able to minimize the detrimental effects of high-light illumination on PSII by modulating the energy and electron transfer, but lose such a capability if the repair cycle is arrested. It is further hypothesized that dynamic regulation of the LHCII system has a pivotal role in the control of excitation energy transfer upon PSII damage and repair cycle to maintain the photosynthesis safe and efficient.

The carbon (formerly dark) reactions of photosynthesis

In this brief account, I describe the background for dividing photosynthesis into "light" and "dark" reactions and show how this concept changed to "light" and "carbon" reactions as science in the field advanced.