1
|
Kinnunen J, Nikkinen H, Keikkala E, Mustaniemi S, Gissler M, Laivuori H, Eriksson JG, Kaaja R, Pouta A, Kajantie E, Vääräsmäki M. Gestational diabetes is associated with the risk of offspring's congenital anomalies: a register-based cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2023; 23:708. [PMID: 37789251 PMCID: PMC10548673 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05996-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common pregnancy-related disorder and a well-known risk factor for adverse pregnancy outcomes. There are conflicting findings on the association of GDM with the risk of congenital anomalies (CAs) in offspring. In this study, we aimed to determine study whether maternal GDM is associated with an increased risk of major CAs in offspring. METHODS This Finnish Gestational Diabetes (FinnGeDi) register-based study included 6,597 women with singleton pregnancies and a diagnosis of GDM and 51,981 singleton controls with no diabetes identified from the Finnish Medical Birth Register (MBR) in 2009. Data from MBR were combined in this study with the Register of Congenital Malformations, which includes the data of CAs. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) for CAs, together with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), adjusting for maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), and maternal smoking status. RESULTS The risk of major CAs was higher in the GDM-exposed (n = 336, 5.09%) than in the non-exposed group (n = 2,255, 4.33%) (OR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.05-1.33, p = 0.005). The adjusted OR (aOR) was 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.30, p = 0.047). There was a higher overall prevalence of CAs, particularly chromosomal abnormalities (0.52% vs. 0.21%), in the GDM-exposed group (OR: 2.49, 95% Cl: 1.69-3.66, p < 0.001). The aOR was 1.93 (95% Cl: 1.25-2.99, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS Offspring exposed to GDM have a higher prevalence of major CAs. Of note, risk factors other than GDM, such as older maternal age and a higher pre-pregnancy BMI, diminished the between group differences in the prevalence of major CAs. Nevertheless, our findings suggest that offspring exposed to maternal GDM are more likely to be diagnosed with a chromosomal abnormality, independent of maternal age, parity, pre-pregnancy BMI, and smoking.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jenni Kinnunen
- Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90029, Finland.
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Population Health, Public Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Oulu, 00271, 90101, Finland.
| | - Hilkka Nikkinen
- Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90029, Finland
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Population Health, Public Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Oulu, 00271, 90101, Finland
| | - Elina Keikkala
- Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90029, Finland
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Population Health, Public Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Oulu, 00271, 90101, Finland
| | - Sanna Mustaniemi
- Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90029, Finland
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Population Health, Public Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Oulu, 00271, 90101, Finland
| | - Mika Gissler
- Department of Knowledge Brokers, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, 00271, Finland
- Academic Primary Health Care Centre, Region Stockholm, Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, 17176, Sweden
| | - Hannele Laivuori
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology Tampere University Hospital, Tampere University, Tampere, 33100, Finland
- Medical and Clinical Genetics, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland
- Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, Helsinki Institute of Life Science, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland
| | - Johan G Eriksson
- Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Helsinki University Hospital, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, 00014, Finland
- Folkhälsan Research Center, Helsinki, 00250, Finland
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Human Potential Translational Research Programme, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 119228, Singapore
| | - Risto Kaaja
- Turku University Hospital, Turku University, Turku, 20521, Finland
| | - Anneli Pouta
- Department of Government Services, Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, 00271, Finland
| | - Eero Kajantie
- Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90029, Finland
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Population Health, Public Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Oulu, 00271, 90101, Finland
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Children's Hospital, Helsinki, 00290, Finland
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, NO-7491, Norway
| | - Marja Vääräsmäki
- Wellbeing Services County of North Ostrobothnia, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Research Unit of Clinical Medicine, Medical Research Center, Oulu University Hospital, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90029, Finland
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare, Population Health, Public Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Oulu, 00271, 90101, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kirubamani NH, Meenatshi M. Target scan-the experience at saveetha medical college. J Clin Diagn Res 2013; 7:873-5. [PMID: 23814731 PMCID: PMC3681058 DOI: 10.7860/jcdr/2013/5462.2962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2012] [Accepted: 02/11/2013] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The identification of foetal anomalies in utero is important. The prenatal detection of such abnormalities, often aids in planning the appropriate obstetrical management. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the antenatal prevalence of the major congenital anomalies and the malformation patterns which were seen in low risk patients of our hospital population. STUDY DESIGN This was a cross-sectional and an observational study. SETTINGS This study was done in the Radiology and Obstetrics Department of Saveetha Medical College, India. DURATION It extended from June 2012 to Aug 2012. SAMPLE SIZE It was done on 250 patients. RESULTS The incidence of foetal anomalies in our study was 2.97%. The mean maternal/mean gestational age at diagnosis was 24.5years /20 weeks. Among the 250 cases, five cases had lethal anomalies and two cases had non lethal anomalies. The lethal anomalies were cystic hygroma, body stalk anomaly, multicystic kidney, non immune hydrops and a Dandy Walker variant. All of the patients were primi gravida, without any risk factors. Two non lethal anomalies which were found were a duplication cyst in the foetal abdomen and a single umbilical artery. Foetal kartotyping and foetal autopsies were done in two cases. The parents of the offsprings with the lethal anomalies were counseled and they decided to go for termination of the pregnancies. It was offered to them. For the non- lethal cases, complete postnatal work ups were done by the paediatrician. CONCLUSION The sonographic demonstration of a lethal foetal anomalies is mandatory, which may dramatically alter the obstetrical management and it also aids in the parental preparation. Future Scope: In our study, all the non compatible with life anomalies were seen in the young primi without any risk factors and hence, the environmental cause has to be studied.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Navamani Hephzibah Kirubamani
- Professor, Department of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Saveetha UniversitySaveetha Nagar, Thandalam Post, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Pin Code 602 105, District Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - M.R Meenatshi
- Sonologist, Saveetha Medical College & Hospital, Saveetha University, Saveetha Nagar, Thandalam Post, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Pin Code 602 105, District Kanchipuram, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|