A multicenter interdisciplinary survey of practices and opinions regarding oral intake during labor

INTRODUCTION

Different society guidelines diverge regarding oral intake in labor. Our goal was to assess practices and opinions in Israeli labor and delivery units, comparing different disciplines.

METHODS

An anonymous Google Forms survey was sent to anesthesiologists, obstetricians and midwives in all Israeli labor and delivery units.

RESULTS

Responses were collected from all 27 labor and delivery units contacted, with a total of 501 respondents comprising 161 anesthesiologists, 102 obstetricians and 238 midwives. Forty-eight per cent stated there were no institutional guidelines for oral intake. The most common oral intake permitted was light food (60%). Midwives were significantly more likely than anesthesiologists and obstetricians to consider that women who are both low risk for cesarean delivery (P <0.00001) and high risk for cesarean delivery (P=0.001) should eat. Epidural analgesia did not impact recommendations regarding oral intake. The most common reasons for restricting oral intake were obstetric. Sixty-two per cent identified aspiration as the main risk associated with eating during labor, but 19% of midwives compared with 4% of anesthesiologists and obstetricians stated there were no risks (P <0.00001). The annual delivery volume of the unit did not impact staff practices.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a discrepancy between opinions and practices across all disciplines. Permissive practices identified in this survey should be addressed to find the safe middle ground between restrictive and permissive policies for low- and high-risk women.

Clinical Implications of Maternal Disparities Administrative Data Research

Administrative data research on maternal racial disparities supports 2 broad clinical inferences. First, failure to rescue in terms of both death and severe maternal morbidity likely accounts for a significant proportion of maternal disparities. Second, risk for adverse outcomes by race is generally differential with risk for cardiovascular complications particularly high for non-Hispanic black women. These differentials suggest that underlying health conditions may represent an important contributor to overall disparities, and optimal longitudinal care utilization with nonobstetric specialists is required to mitigate risk.

Introduction: Obstetric venous thromboembolism

How to best reduce maternal risk from obstetric venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a relatively controversial topic. In comparison, for other leading causes of maternal mortality and severe morbidity such as obstetric hemorrhage and hypertension, there is general agreement on recommendations. While obstetric VTE poses a unique epidemiological and public health challenge, a number of recommendations related to care improvement and patient safety can be made. This edition of Seminars in Perinatology focuses on (i) overview of clinical research and epidemiology that can serve as a basis for informed decision making regarding VTE prophylaxis strategies, (ii) VTE prophylaxis implementation from a leadership perspective, (iii) future directions for research on obstetric VTE, and (iv) critical care management of obstetric VTE.

Obstetric venous thromboembolism prophylaxis: What obstetricians should know about anesthesia guidelines

In 2018 two documents were released from major anesthesia societies, the American Society for Regional Anesthesia (ASRA) and the Society for Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology (SOAP), to aid anesthesiologists in decision making regarding neuraxial procedures for obstetric patients receiving anticoagulation. For obstetrical providers seeking to provide appropriate inpatient thromboprophylaxis while also maximizing access to neuraxial anesthesia, awareness of these recommendations may be critically important. In comparison to anesthesiologists in other medical and surgical scenarios, obstetric anesthesiologists are more likely to be called upon to administer anesthesia urgently or emergently. Approximately one-third of women in the United States deliver by cesarean, and while many of these procedures will be scheduled, many others will be performed for an urgent indication where timing of delivery cannot be anticipated precisely. The purpose of this review is to summarize key clinical obstetric anesthesia management points related to anticoagulation for the obstetrician so that both VTE prophylaxis and access to neuraxial anesthesia can be optimized.

Outcomes research on obstetric venous thromboembolism

Outcomes research on obstetric venous thromboembolism (VTE) involves a number of major challenges. While obstetric VTE, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is relatively common on a population basis, diagnoses during pregnancy are relatively rare in comparison to high-risk scenarios such as orthopedic surgery. This review characterizes outcomes research on obstetric VTE with a focus on strengths, limitations, and appropriate inferences from existing research. It is divided into four sections. First, evidence regarding validity of diagnosis codes for VTE in administrative data is reviewed. Second, limitations of both clinical research and administrative-data study models are analyzed. Third, examples of high-quality obstetric VTE research from the literature and opportunities for improved research in the future are reviewed. Fourth, future directions for research are explored.

Leveraging resources for obstetric venous thromboembolism prevention in a state safety collaborative

In recent years, state obstetric quality and maternal safety initiatives have led efforts to reduce maternal risk and improve maternal safety. A priority of many of these collaboratives has been to disseminate and implement safety bundles focusing on leading causes of maternal mortality including venous thromboembolism. In 2013, the Safe Motherhood Initiative (SMI), a quality improvement effort led by ACOG District II in New York State, began developing a VTE bundle reviewed available clinical evidence, practice guidelines, and protocols and assessed how hospitals with varying resources could implement standardized approaches to obstetric thromboembolism prophylaxis. This bundle was subsequently released for implementation in New York State's hospitals with support from SMI. The purpose of this review is to characterize, from the perspective of a state safety leadership collaborative, the resources that were most critical in assisting individual hospitals in (i) determining which VTE prophylaxis strategies would be adopted, and (ii) operationalizing implementation.

Optimizing obstetric venous thromboembolism protocol adherence: The experience of a hospital system

The purpose of this review is to explore the role of hospital systems in reliably providing high quality obstetric venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis focusing on the example of the Kaiser Permanente Southern California hospital system. While providers ultimately administer thromboprophylaxis on a patient-by-patient basis, hospital-level protocols, practices, and resources may be the most important determinants of whether a patient receives appropriate care. In comparison to the complex maternal and fetal emergencies that obstetricians are routinely called on to manage, VTE prophylaxis can often be simplified and integrated into the workflow, making decision-making time efficient and straightforward for the provider. Not having protocols (i.e. the provider being on their own) is associated with desired management occurring in only 40% of cases. Enhanced VTE protocols with complementary strategies to encourage use and identification of oversights addressed in real time can result in appropriate care in >90% of cases.