[Failure to draw up medical certificates increase judiciary releases]

OBJECTIVES

In France, a systematic control of compulsory psychiatric admissions has existed since the enactment of the law of July 5th 2011. The Court of Cassation clarified that the liberty and custody judges (JLD) cannot supersede the medical opinion described in the medical certificates. In 2015, the JLD ordered the release of 8.4 % of all compulsory psychiatric admissions. The goal was to compare the quality of medical certificates derived from judicial release based on medical grounds with non-released witnesses from the cohort of compulsory psychiatric admissions ordered in the Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Paris Psychiatrie & Neurosciences (GHU-Paris) between November 1, 2017 and October 31, 2018.

METHODS

We included as cases all the medical certificates derived from judicial release based exclusively on medical grounds from the release cohort of the GHU-Paris from November 1, 2017 to October 31, 2018, concerning the systematic control 12 days after compulsory psychiatric admissions. A witness whose compulsory care had been maintained was matched according to the same judge, place and date of hearing, mode of compulsory care and site of hospitalization. Each certificate was analyzed according to a reading grid relating to the good decisions in matters of compulsory admission and medical certificates' redaction. An overall score, based on the description of the clinical and symptomatic evolution, the level of discernment, the capacity of consent and the mode of compulsory care was awarded to each certificate.

RESULTS

Seventeen release files were included in the comparative study. Globally, the clinical progression, psychiatric symptoms, level of consciousness and ability to consent did not differ in the two groups. The grade of quality of certificate was lower in case of withdrawal (2.92±1.08 VS 3.28±0.88, P=0.026). Psychiatric symptoms in "justifiable notice" (the last medical certificate prior to the judicial hearing) were less specified in case of withdrawal (58.8 % VS 94.1 %, P=0.015). Not describing any symptoms led to a 12.51 risk of withdrawal (95 % CI=[1.16; 135.19], P=0.038). Even with witness certificate, clinical progression was noticed in only 85.3 % of cases, in 89.3 % of psychiatric symptoms, in 68.0 % of level of consciousness and 80.0 % for the ability to consent.

CONCLUSIONS

Judiciary releases of compulsory psychiatric admissions exclusively based on medical grounds are not arbitrarily decided by the JLD but are based on a failure to draw up medical certificates. Doctors must comply with a careful drafting of all medical certificates: description of symptoms, clinical course, level of consciousness and ability to consent. It is necessary to be attentive to judiciary releases based on medical grounds to evaluate and improve medical practices concerning the drafting of medical certificates.

Quality of life in patients with neurofibromatosis type 1: a nationwide database study in Japan from 2015 to 2019

BACKGROUND

This study examined the association between dermatological, neurological, and bone manifestations of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with NF1 using a nationwide database of all patients who newly claimed for medical expense subsidies in Japan from 2015 to 2019.

METHODS

The Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare provided the "National Database of Designated Intractable Diseases of Japan" containing clinical and personal records ("Medical Certificates of Designated Intractable Diseases") of all patients with NF1 following approval of the study protocol. To examine the association between the severity of symptoms and QoL, multinominal logistic regression analyses were performed, adjusted for potential confounders.

RESULTS

The final study population consisted of 1,487 patients (775 females and 712 males; mean (standard deviation) age, 45.4 (17.9) years). More than 50% and nearly 45% of participants were recorded as having moderate or severe "pain/discomfort" and "anxiety/depression," respectively. The severity of neurological symptoms was significantly associated with all components of QoL, whereas the severity of dermatological symptoms was significantly associated with only moderate or severe subjective and mental health-related components of QoL, and the severity of bone lesions was associated with only moderate or severe physical health-related components of QoL. Subjective and mental health-related components of QoL tended to be deteriorated more than physical health-related components of QoL in younger and female patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Severities of neurological and dermatological symptoms were significantly associated with subjective and mental health-related components of QoL, while the severity of bone symptoms was associated with only moderate and severe deterioration of physical health-related components of QoL.

[Possession of weapons and hunting license]

Possession of weapons and hunting license.Firearms are the cause of more than a thousand deaths each year, representing a significant public health goal. For type B and C firearms, sport shooting, and hunting licences, the attending physician plays a crucial role, issuing a certificate in each case according to very specific terms and conditions.

[Medical certificates, determination of the total work incapacity, and elementary traumatic injuries]

Medical certificates, determination of the total work incapacity, and elementary traumatic injuries. The drafting of medical certificates is an essential act in the practice of every doctor. Its importance on the medico- legal level obliges us to write these certificates in an applied and rigorous way. In the case of assault and battery, the doctor must issue an initial medical certificate describing all the medical findings. The judicial authority will require a forensic doctor from a Forensic Unit to determine the total incapacity to work, a period during which the patient is unable to carry out all the gestures of daily life independently.

[Descriptive study of the releases pronounced by the liberty and detention judge at groupe hospitalier universitaire Paris psychiatrie & neurosciences from November 2017 to October 2018]

OBJECTIVE

In France, a systematic control of compulsory psychiatric admissions has existed since the enactment of the law of 5 July 2011. In 2015, the judge of freedoms and detention ordered the withdrawal of 8.4 % of the compulsory psychiatric admissions. The aim of the study is to describe the grounds for judiciary withdrawals of compulsory admissions ordered in the groupe hospitalier universitaire paris psychiatrie & neurosciences (GHU-Paris) between November 1, 2017 and October 31, 2018.

METHODS

All of the withdrawal decisions adjudged during the mentioned period in the GHU-Paris were analysed following a specific framework. The main analysis deals with the classification of the "administrative", "medical", and "mixed" grounds. The secondary analysis looks at the fundamental facts affecting the judge of freedoms and detention's decision.

RESULTS

Of the 127 orders decided by 21 judges of freedoms and detention analysed in this study, the majority were part of the systematic control of compulsory psychiatric admissions (74.8 %) and were made through a referral procedure by the director's hospital (69.3 %). The main reasons for withdrawal decisions were "mixed" (52.9 %), among which were described: failure to respect time limit (20.2 %), failure to inform the patient (11.6 %), third party's proceeding (8.7 %) and lack of documents (8.7 %). "Medical" grounds account for 31.8 % of all grounds. More precisely, failure to respect the required elements for involuntary admissions in psychiatric services was the greatest subcategory (29.5 %). "Other" grounds represented 15.8 %. No "administrative" ground was found. Judges ordered 69.3 % withdrawals within 24 hours to allow community treatment orders to be put into place. In the centre hospitalier Sainte-Anne, 70.8 % of the 24 appeals quashed the first decision by the judge of freedoms and detention.

CONCLUSION

Several reasons justify withdrawals of compulsory psychiatric admissions. Scrupulously respecting procedures and drafting psychiatric certificates might decrease the number of withdrawals.

[Victims of terrorist attacks: forensic issues]

Victims of terrorist attacks: forensic issues. France has recently suffered multiple terrorist attacks. A lot of physicians had to face massive incoming victims. The first priority was somatic and psychological care. However, lack of juridical counseling led to delay in victim status recognition. Legal procedures are essentials in patients' recovery. We propose guidelines for medical certificate writing and first response legal orientation of terrorism victims.

The quality of medical death certification of cause of death in hospitals in rural Bangladesh: impact of introducing the International Form of Medical Certificate of Cause of Death

Background

Accurate and timely data on cause of death are critically important for guiding health programs and policies. Deaths certified by doctors are implicitly considered to be reliable and accurate, yet the quality of information provided in the international Medical Certificate of Cause of Death (MCCD) usually varies according to the personnel involved in certification, the diagnostic capacity of the hospital, and the category of hospitals. There are no published studies that have analysed how certifying doctors in Bangladesh adhere to international rules when completing the MCCD or have assessed the quality of clinical record keeping.

Methods

The study took place between January 2011 and April 2014 in the Chandpur and Comilla districts of Bangladesh. We introduced the international MCCD to all study hospitals. Trained project physicians assigned an underlying cause of death, assessed the quality of the death certificate, and reported the degree of certainty of the medical records provided for a given cause. We examined the frequency of common errors in completing the MCCD, the leading causes of in-hospital deaths, and the degree of certainty in the cause of death data.

Results

The study included 4914 death certificates. 72.9% of medical records were of too poor quality to assign a cause of death, with little difference by age, hospital, and cause of death. 95.6% of death certificates did not indicate the time interval between onset and death, 31.6% required a change in sequence, 13.9% required to include a new diagnosis, 50.7% used abbreviations, 41.5% used multiple causes per line, and 33.2% used an ill-defined condition as the underlying cause of death. 99.1% of death certificates had at least one error. The leading cause of death among adults was stroke (15.8%), among children was pneumonia (31.7%), and among neonates was birth asphyxia (52.8%).

Conclusion

Physicians in Bangladeshi hospitals had difficulties in completing the MCCD correctly. Physicians routinely made errors in death certification practices and medical record quality was poor. There is an urgent need to improve death certification practices and the quality of hospital data in Bangladesh if these data are to be useful for policy.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-017-2628-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Indications, barriers and relevance of standardization]

BACKGROUND

In view of medical care being required more and more, the doctors' tight time should be reserved for tasks which correspond to their qualification. A standardization of certificates might save time and improve quality.

OBJECTIVE

This paper overviews the role of certificates and the required examinations in family doctor's everyday practice. Current practices, difficulties and suggestions for improvements were worked out in order to illuminate the potential for standardization.

METHODS

In a questionnaire for family doctors data concerning expenditure of time and billing of diverse certificates were collected and quantitatively evaluated. By means of expert interviews difficulties were identified and suggestions for improvement were developed.

RESULTS

The use of templates shows a significant saving of time compared to free wording. Also, billing could be enhanced if carried out more systematically. Difficulties are mainly caused by unclear and unrealistic requests.

CONCLUSIONS

It's worth being proactive and developing a systematic approach in order to save time and to improve the quality of certificates. Templates facilitate modest certificates, while elaborate certificates need adjustable textmodules and checklists. Consistent information and billing promote patients' understanding.

Fitness for detention in police custody: a practical proposal for improving the format of medical opinion

Health issues among arrestees are a worldwide concern for which only local policies have been established. Physicians attending detainees in police custody are expected to decide whether the detainee's health status is compatible with detention in a police station and make any useful observations. A high degree of heterogeneity in the information collected by the physician and transmitted to the police has been observed. We analyzed the content and limitations of available documents and developed a model that could serve as a guide for any attending physician. The document presented here has been used in France on over 50,000 occasions since June 2010. We developed a two-page template consisting of (1) a standard medical certificate to be sent to the authority who requested the doctor's attendance and (2) a confidential medical record, not sent to the requesting authority. We evaluated perceived health by the three global health indicators of the Minimum European Health Module and used DSM IV criteria for the evaluation of addictive disorders. In the case of recent traumatic injuries, the certificate has also included the collection of data on traumatic injuries and the contexts of their occurrence. The proposed certificate achieved several goals, by protecting the interests of the person examined, in case of poor conditions of arrest or detention, protecting doctors in cases of legal proceedings, and allowing epidemiological data to be collected. The certificate may also contribute to an international awareness of medical care for detainees in police custody.