Long-term antibody persistence after a booster dose of quadrivalent meningococcal ACWY-tetanus toxoid conjugate vaccine in healthy 5-year-old children

BACKGROUND

To provide continuing protection, available meningococcal vaccines must provide long-term persistence of circulating functional antibodies against prevalent serogroups causing invasive meningococcal disease (IMD). This study assessed antibody persistence and safety of the quadrivalent meningococcal vaccine conjugated to tetanus toxoid (MenACWY-TT) and the meningococcal serogroup C vaccine conjugated to Corynebacterium diphtheriae CRM₁₉₇ protein (MenC-CRM) for up to 6 years after booster dosing in children.

METHODS

In the primary vaccination study, children were vaccinated at age 12 to 23 months. In the first extension study, children who completed the primary study received a booster dose 4 years later with the same primary vaccine. The current study assessed antibody persistence at 2 to 6 years postbooster against each of the 4 meningococcal serogroups using serum bactericidal assays using rabbit (rSBA) or human (hSBA) complement with antibody titer thresholds of ≥1:8 or ≥1:4, respectively, and geometric mean titers (GMTs). Safety evaluations during this period included serious adverse events (SAEs) related to vaccination and any event related to lack of vaccine efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 184 subjects were enrolled (MenACWY-TT = 159; MenC-CRM = 25). For MenACWY-TT, the percentages of subjects with rSBA titers ≥1:8 ranged from 96.7% to 100% across serogroups at 2 years postbooster and 71.6% to 94.0% at 6 years postbooster; rSBA GMTs decreased from Year 2 to 4 and generally remained stable thereafter. The percentages of subjects in the MenACWY-TT group with hSBA titers ≥1:4 were 70.0% to 100% across serogroups at 2 years postbooster and 58.5% to 98.5% at 6 years postbooster. No lack of efficacy, SAEs, or vaccine-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

The persistence of rSBA and hSBA antibodies was shown up to 6 years postbooster (10 years postprimary vaccination) with either MenACWY-TT or MenC-CRM, suggesting that this schedule may provide long-term protection against IMD. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01900899.

Immunogenicity and safety of concomitant administration of meningococcal serogroup B (4CMenB) and serogroup C (MenC-CRM) vaccines in infants: A phase 3b, randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

After implementation of routine infant MenC vaccination, MenB remains a serious cause of meningococcal disease, yet to be targeted by vaccination programs in several countries. This study (NCT01339923) investigated the immunogenicity and safety of MenC CRM-conjugated vaccine (MenC-CRM) concomitantly administered with MenB vaccine (4CMenB).

METHODS

Infants (N=251) were randomised 1:1 to receive 4CMenB and MenC-CRM (Group 1) or MenC-CRM alone (Group 2) at 3 and 5months (M3, M5) and a booster at 12months of age (M12), and pneumococcal vaccine at M3, M5, M7, M12. Antibody responses to meningococcal vaccines were measured at M3, M6, M12, and M13. Non-inferiority of MenC-CRM response in Group 1 vs Group 2 was demonstrated at M6 and M13, if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (LL95%CI) of the difference in percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥1:8 was >-10%. Sufficiency of MenB response was achieved if LL95%CI of the percentage of infants with hSBA titres ≥1:4 against fHbp, NadA and PorA strains was ≥70% at M6 or ≥75% at M13. Adverse events (AEs) were collected for 7days post-vaccination, and serious AEs (SAEs) and medically attended AEs throughout the study.

RESULTS

Non-inferiority of MenC response in Group 1 vs Group 2 (LL95%CI -6.4% [M6]; -5.2% [M13]) and sufficiency of MenB response in Group 1 (LL95%CI 92%, 90%, 89% [M6]; 97%, 92%, 93% [M13] against fHbp, NadA, PorA, respectively) were demonstrated. Higher rates of mild to moderate solicited AEs were reported in Group 1. Unsolicited AEs and SAEs incidences were similar across groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant administration of MenC-CRM and 4CMenB in infants was immunogenic, resulting in non-inferior responses against MenC compared to MenC-CRM alone and demonstration of sufficient immune response to MenB, after primary and booster vaccination. Reactogenicity was higher for concomitant vaccines administration, but no safety concerns were identified.