Treatment of bipolar disorders in older adults: a review

BACKGROUND

Old age bipolar disorder has been an orphan of psychiatric research for a long time despite the fact that bipolar disorder (BD)-I and II together may affect 0.5-1.0% of the elderly. It is also unclear whether aetiology, course of illness and treatment should differ in patients with a first manifestation in older age and patients suffering from a recurrence of a BD known for decades. This narrative review will summarize the current state of knowledge about the epidemiology, clinical features, and treatment of BD in the elderly.

METHODS

We conducted a Medline literature search from 1970 to 2021 using MeSH terms "Bipolar Disorder" × "Aged" or "Geriatric" or "Elderly". Search results were complemented by additional literature retrieved from examining cross references and by hand search in text books. Varying cut-off ages have been applied to differentiate old age from adult age BD. Within old age BD, there is a reasonable agreement of distinct entities, early and late-onset BD. They differ to some extent in clinical symptoms, course of illness, and some co-morbidities. Point prevalence of BD in older adults appears slightly lower than in working-age adults, with polarity of episodes shifting towards depression. Psychopharmacological treatment needs to take into account the special aspects of somatic gerontology and the age-related change of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics. The evidence for commonly used treatments such as lithium, mood-stabilizing antiepileptics, antipsychotics, and antidepressants remains sparse. Preliminary results support a role of ECT as well as psychotherapy and psychosocial interventions in old age BD.

CONCLUSIONS

There is an obvious need of further research for all treatment modalities of BD in old age. The focus should be pharmacological and psychosocial approaches, as well as their combination, and the role of physical treatment modalities such as ECT.

Naturalistic follow-up in bipolar patients after successful electroconvulsive therapy

BACKGROUND

Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for acute depression, mania and mixed states. We evaluated the long-term outcome of patients with bipolar depression or mixed state, responsive to ECT.

METHODS

this observational follow-up study was conducted in 70 patients with Bipolar Disorder: 36 patients met DSM-IV-TR criteria for a major depressive episode (MDE) and 34 for a mixed episode (MXE). During the follow-up after ECT, the relapse rates and the duration of response and remission periods were recorded.

RESULTS

the mean duration of the follow-up was 57 weeks. 93% of the patients maintained at least a partial therapeutic response for more than 90% of the follow-up period. 73% of patients fulfilled the criteria for a full remission, 33% showed a depressive relapse and 10% a mixed relapse. No manic relapses occurred but almost 1/3 of the sample presented hypomanic episodes. MDE patients presented higher rates of remission compared to MXE ones. Patients with anxiety disorders reported earlier relapses than those without this comorbidity. Relapsed-patients showed higher functional impairment at baseline evaluation, compared to non-relapsed ones.

LIMITATIONS

nonrandom allocation, limited sample size, possible influence of psychopharmacological treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Given several methodological limitations, this study cannot draw definite conclusions but could suggest that in treatment-resistant bipolar patients with severe depression or mixed state, ECT may represent a useful treatment option. Patients with mixed features, comorbid anxiety disorders and higher functional impairment present less favorable outcome. Future research on long-term efficacy of ECT and on clinical predictors of relapse is needed.

Blood homocysteine concentration and mood disorders with mixed features among patients with alcohol use disorder

BACKGROUND

Blood homocysteine concentration (BHC) is higher in patients with alcohol use disorder (AUD). Previous studies have found a relationship between depressive symptoms severity and BHC in AUD patients and recently some authors have found high BHC among patients with bipolar disorder, both during manic and depressive episodes and in euthymic state. However, BHC in patients with mixed mood episode has not yet been investigated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the BHC of patients with AUD and mixed mood episode.

METHODS

A sample of AUD outpatients was assessed by Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI Plus): those with a DSM-IV-TR mood disorder with mixed features were included in the MIXED group (n = 45), whereas those without mood episode were gathered in the NO MOOD group (n = 23). Two subgroups, MIXMANIA and MIXDEPRESSION, were formed according to the prevalence of manic or depressive symptoms, assessed by Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HDRS). The Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test (AUDIT) was used to appraise the AUD. BHC was determined by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography.

RESULTS

The MIXED group showed greater severity of both depressive (26.35 ± 9.96 vs. 4.77 ± 0.92; p < 0.001) and manic (22.35 ± 3.30 vs. 6.14 ± 1.12; p < 0.001) symptoms, and higher BHC (28.80 ± 11.47 vs. 10.83 ± 2.81; p < 0.001), than the NO MOOD group. BHC was strongly correlated to the HDRS, YMRS and AUDIT scores, just as HDRS was to YMRS, and AUDIT was to both HDRS and YMRS, in the MIXED group only (p < 0.001). The MIXDEPRESSION subgroup showed higher BHC than the MIXMANIA subgroup (Mdn = 42.96, IQR = 10.44 vs. Mdn = 19.77, IQR = 5.93; p < 0.001). A linear regression model conducted on the MIXED group found a significant predictive value for BHC of both HDRS (β = 0.560, t = 2.43, p = 0.026) and AUDIT (β = 0.348, t = 2.17, p = 0.044).

CONCLUSIONS

Depressive symptoms seem to be mainly implicated in the BHC elevation among patients with both mixed features mood disorder and AUD.

[Mixed depression and DSM-5: A critical review]

BACKGROUND

Mixed depression is a depressive syndrome characterized by the presence, along with the typical depressive symptoms of depression, of those of over activation and excitation. If sometimes this activation is expressed by classical hypomanic symptoms, it is often observed by means of more subtle expression: inner tension, crowded thoughts, dramatic expression suffering, and unproductive agitation. It is important to identify mixed depression because such patients are particularly at risk of suicidal behaviors, substance abuse and therapeutic resistance. Even if therapeutic strategies continue to be discussed, treatments should rely on mood stabilizers and antipsychotics instead of antidepressants as in pure depression. Even though the concept of mixed depression has been described for more than twenty years, first by Koukopoulos and then by other authors, it had been little studied, especially because it did not appear in international psychiatric classifications. The DSM-IV supported a very narrow conception of the mixed states because the criteria required simultaneous full manic and full depressive syndromes, corresponding only to some dysphoric manias. The recently published DSM-5 proposes modifications in mood and bipolar disorder classifications, and especially introduces the possibility to specify depressive and manic episodes with "mixed features". To diagnose depression with mixed features, a full depressive syndrome has to be present together most of time with three hypomanic symptoms, except symptoms that are considered as overlapping (that can be observed either in mania or in depression), i.e. agitation, irritability and distractibility.

METHODS

Critical analysis of DSM criteria and review of literature.

RESULTS

We first analyzed the clinical relevance of the definition of depression with mixed features which could correspond to mixed depression. The problem is that the hypomanic symptoms allowed by the manual lead to symptom associations that are rather illogical (as euphoria with depression) or improbable (as increased or excessive involvement in activities that have a high potential for painful consequences). Also, some more specific symptoms that can be observed in mixed depression are not mentioned (such as hypersensitivity to light or noise, absence of motor retardation, dramatic expressivity of suffering). The DSM-5, as did DSM-IV, refers to an understanding of mixed depression as a simple addition of depressive and manic symptoms. The classification does not take into account that the symptoms could be rather different from hypomania, as the expression of an overactive thought in a depressed mind. Secondly, we reviewed cohort studies using the DSM-5 criteria (or similar criteria with the exclusion of overlapping symptoms), and as a consequence of the poorly defined symptoms, we found that the diagnosis of mixed depression according to DSM-5 is almost impossible, either in unipolar or in bipolar depression.

CONCLUSIONS

We think, with others, that the definition of the mixed depression by the DSM-5 is not clinically relevant and misses important information about the concept. Clinicians can be attentive to the identification of mixed character in depression, even if DSM-5 criteria are not fully met. Unfortunately, the DSM-5 definition could undermine research efforts for a better understanding of epidemiology, phenomenology and therapeutics of mixed depression. We propose and discuss alternative solutions for defining mixed depression, such as the absence of exclusion of "overlapping" symptoms, a more insighted phenomenology, or a dimensional approach.

Decreased plasma levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) during mixed episodes of bipolar disorder

BACKGROUND

Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) is a neurotrophin involved in neurogenesis and neuroplasticity. Decreased blood levels of BDNF have been found during acute manic and depressive states. BDNF has been proposed as a biomarker in illness phases of mood disorders. No information is available regarding BDNF levels during the mixed states of bipolar disorder (BD). The aim of this study was to evaluate BDNF levels during mixed episodes of BD patients and compare them with those of healthy subjects and depressed patients.

METHODS

Plasma BDNF levels were measured by an ELISA assay in 18 patients with major depressive episode (MDE), 19 patients with mixed episode (ME) and 15 healthy subjects (HS).

RESULTS

BDNF levels were significantly higher in HS, as compared with patients׳ samples (HS vs. MDE patients: p<001; HS vs. ME patients: p=.022). No significant differences were found between BDNF levels of ME and MDE patients. The severity of illness as assessed by CGI-S was significantly higher in ME than in MDE patients (p=.01).

LIMITATIONS

The small sample size may have weakened the power of statistical analyses. All patients received mood-stabilizing and antidepressant treatments which have been reported to influence peripheral BDNF levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results are consistent with previous studies showing reduced BDNF during both manic and depressive episodes. This finding supports the role of BDNF as a state-marker of mood episodes, and may represent a contribution to a unitary approach model between unipolar and BDs, as well as to the manic-depressive spectrum model.

[Mixed states and neuroimaging]

Despite the growing number of neuroimaging studies in bipolar disorder over the past years, the brain regions involved in mood dysregulation in this disease are still poorly understood. If some neurofunctional abnormalities seem to be independent of mood state, others were preferentially associated with mania or depression, involving the amygdala and other limbic regions as well as ventral frontal regions, with a likely hemispheric lateralization of these abnormalities according to the thymic state that was examined. Very few imaging studies became interested in bipolar patients in a mixed state, making it harder to connect brain malfunction to a given mood state. However, data obtained so far support the hypothesis of a lateralization of brain abnormalities in relation to bipolar symptomatology, suggesting that neurofonctional abnormalities preferentially located in the right ventral frontal and limbic areas may underlie the depressive component, associated with abnormalities of the left similar regions for the manic component. Identification of brain dysfunctions that may explain the emergence of mixed symptoms will likely provide useful information to better understand the respective roles of each hemisphere in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder.

An update on the treatment of mixed bipolar states: what is new in 2013?

Although common and severe, mixed states are rarely the subject of proper clinical trials. The aim of this paper is to systematically review data published in 2013 on the pharmacological treatment of mixed states.

METHODS

The Medline database was searched for 2013 publications using the following keywords: 'treatment'; 'mixed'; 'bipolar'.

RESULTS

Medline search returned 118 results. Manual inspection of abstracts allowed selecting six papers for further review. The first meta-analysis of the efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics in mixed episodes, published in 2013, showed the efficacy of these agents. Other papers suggested that asenapine and olanzapine were efficacious for mixed episodes, with olanzapine being equally effective in patients with or without substance abuse. Aripiprazole and ziprasidone were reported to be efficacious and safe in treating manic/mixed episodes in children and adolescents. In another trial, Calcitonin was not found to be superior to placebo in treating manic/mixed episodes.

CONCLUSION

Although data suggest that most agents efficacious for mania may also be efficacious for mixed episodes, further studies are needed to confirm this assumption.

[Clinical description of mixed mania]

DSM-IV mixed states have become the mixed mania and mixed depression in the new DSM-5. One noticeable point is the introduction of nine cations, among which the "with mixed features" specification. These non exclusive specifications may contribute to a more precise identification of mixed clinical pictures, and therefore to offer a more efficient therapeutic answer. Different dimensional approaches are widely documented. They allow the isolation of a mixed factor which is clinically associated with two other specifications: anxious distress and psychotic features. These severity markers may encourage clinicians to be alert about the risk of misdiagnosis, and cautious in the management of these clinical situations.

Clinical subtypes of severe bipolar mixed states

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to identify different clinical subtypes in severe, treatment resistant bipolar mixed state (MS).

METHOD

The sample comprised 202 Bipolar I patients currently in MS referred for an Electro-convulsive Therapy (ECT) trial and evaluated in the first week of hospitalization and one week after the ECT course. Principal component factor analysis (PCA) followed by Varimax rotation was performed on 21 non-overlapping items selected from Hamilton rating-scale for depression (HAMD) and from Young mania rating-scale (YMRS) at baseline evaluation. Cluster subtypes derived from the factor scores were compared in clinical variables and final HAMD, YMRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) and Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scores.

RESULTS

The principal-component analysis extracted 6 interpretable factors explaining 55.9% of the total variance. Cluster analysis identified four groups, including respectively 63 (31.2%) subjects with Agitated-Irritable Mixed-Depression, 59 (29.2%) with Psychotic Mixed-Mania, 17 (8.5%) with Anxious-Irritable-Psychotic Mixed-Mania, and 63 (31.2%) with Retarded-Psychotic Mixed-Depression. The four clusters were statistically distinct and did not show significant overlap in the main symptomatological presentation. Cluster subtypes reported differences in number of past mood episodes, duration of the current episode, suicide attempts, lifetime comorbidity with panic and eating disorders, baseline and final rating-scale scores and rate of remission after ECT trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that, at least in severe treatment resistant MS, multiple depressive and manic subtypes can be observed with substantial differences in terms of clinical presentation, course, associated comorbidities and treatment response.