Recent Progress on Potentiometric Sensor Applications Based on Nanoscale Metal Oxides: A Comprehensive Review

Electrochemical sensors have been the subject of much research and development as of late, with several publications detailing new designs boasting enhanced performance metrics. That is, without a doubt, because such sensors stand out from other analytical tools thanks to their excellent analytical characteristics, low cost, and ease of use. Their progress has shown a trend toward seeking out novel useful nano structure materials. A variety of nanostructure metal oxides have been utilized in the creation of potentiometric sensors, which are the subject of this article. For screen-printed pH sensors, metal oxides have been utilized as sensing layers due to their mixed ion-electron conductivity and as paste-ion-selective electrode components and in solid-contact electrodes. Further significant uses include solid-contact layers. All the metal oxide uses mentioned are within the purview of this article. Nanoscale metal oxides have several potential uses in the potentiometry method, and this paper summarizes such uses, including hybrid materials and single-component layers. Potentiometric sensors with outstanding analytical properties can be manufactured entirely from metal oxides. These novel sensors outperform the more traditional, conventional electrodes in terms of useful characteristics. In this review, we looked at the potentiometric analytical properties of different building solutions with various nanoscale metal oxides.

Insights into the selectivity of metallic oxides for arsenic and phosphate from EXAFS and DFT calculations

Phosphate is the biggest competitor for arsenic removal. Nanoscale metal oxides (NMOs) are commonly used to treat arsenic-contaminated water, yet their selective adsorption mechanisms for arsenic and phosphate are poorly understood. We quantified the selectivity of iron oxide (Fe2O3), zinc oxide (ZnO), and titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanosheets for arsenic in systems containing arsenic and phosphate, and determined the interaction of phosphate and arsenate/arsenite on metal oxide surfaces through batch experiments, spectroscopic techniques, and DFT calculations. We found that Fe2O3, TiO2, and ZnO nanosheets exhibit selectivity for arsenate/arsenite in the presence of phosphate, with Fe2O3 the most selective, followed by TiO2 and ZnO. The bonding mechanism on these metallic oxide surfaces dominates the selectivity. The more stable inner-sphere complexes of arsenate on the surfaces of Fe2O3 (bidentate binuclear), TiO2 (bidentate binuclear), and ZnO nanosheets (tridentate trinuclear) contribute to their preference for arsenate over phosphate. This difference in arsenate selectivity can be reflected in the difference in adsorption energy, net electron transfer number, and M - O bond length of the most stable inner sphere complexes. Overall, our study elucidated the selective adsorption mechanisms of arsenate/arsenite on Fe2O3, TiO2, and ZnO surfaces and highlighted the need to consider the competition between arsenate and phosphate during their removal from contaminated water.