Novel peptide-based oncolytic vaccine for enhancement of adaptive antitumor immune response via co-engagement of innate Fcγ and Fcα receptors

BACKGROUND

Cancer immunotherapy relies on using the immune system to recognize and eradicate cancer cells. Adaptive immunity, which consists of mainly antigen-specific cytotoxic T cells, plays a pivotal role in controlling cancer progression. However, innate immunity is a necessary component of the cancer immune response to support an immunomodulatory state, enabling T-cell immunosurveillance.

METHODS

Here, we elucidated and exploited innate immune cells to sustain the generation of antigen-specific T cells on the use of our cancer vaccine platform. We explored a previously developed oncolytic adenovirus (AdCab) encoding for a PD-L1 (Programmed-Death Ligand 1) checkpoint inhibitor, which consists of a PD-1 (Programmed Cell Death Protein 1) ectodomain fused to an IgG/A cross-hybrid Fc. We coated AdCab with major histocompatibility complex (MHC-I)-restricted tumor peptides, generating a vaccine platform (named PeptiCab); the latter takes advantage of viral immunogenicity, peptide cancer specificity to prime T-cell responses, and antibody-mediated effector functions.

RESULTS

As proof of concept, PeptiCab was used in murine models of melanoma and colon cancer, resulting in tumor growth control and generation of systemic T-cell-mediated antitumor responses. In specific, PeptiCab was able to generate antitumor T effector memory cells able to secrete various inflammatory cytokines. Moreover, PeptiCab was able to polarize neutrophils to attain an antigen-presenting phenotype by upregulating MHC-II, CD80 and CD86 resulting in an enhanced T-cell expansion.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that exploiting innate immunity activates T-cell antitumor responses, enhancing the efficiency of a vaccine platform based on oncolytic adenovirus coated with MHC-I-restricted tumor peptides.

Annular neutrophilic dermatoses

Neutrophilic dermatoses (NDs) constitute a group of diseases characterized by sterile neutrophilic infiltrations. Many NDs usually present with infiltrated erythematous plaques, nodules, urticarial plaques, or pustules. Lesions may show variability, and atypical presentations may develop among NDs. Annular lesions have been reported in many NDs and may lead to diagnostic problems. Clinical features and histopathologic findings such as localization of the neutrophilic infiltrate, existence of other cell types, and absence of true vasculitis may be helpful to distinguish NDs. Some of these NDs are associated with infections, inflammatory diseases, and malignancies. In most NDs, systemic steroids and dapsone are very effective and usually first choices. Colchicine, antimicrobials such as doxycycline, tetracycline, and sulfapyridine, and other immunosuppressants such as cyclosporin, methotrexate, and mycophenolate mofetil have been used successfully in treating many NDs. Tumor necrosis factor α inhibitors have also been used successfully in treating many NDs. Janus kinase inhibitors are effective in CANDLE (chronic atypical neutrophilic dermatosis with lipodystrophy and elevated temperature) syndrome, anakinra in neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis, and intravenous immunoglobulin in resistant pyoderma gangrenosum. We discuss the diagnosis and management of NDs that may present with annular lesions.