1
|
Harrill JA, Everett LJ, Haggard DE, Bundy JL, Willis CM, Shah I, Friedman KP, Basili D, Middleton A, Judson RS. Exploring the effects of experimental parameters and data modeling approaches on in vitro transcriptomic point-of-departure estimates. Toxicology 2024; 501:153694. [PMID: 38043774 DOI: 10.1016/j.tox.2023.153694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Multiple new approach methods (NAMs) are being developed to rapidly screen large numbers of chemicals to aid in hazard evaluation and risk assessments. High-throughput transcriptomics (HTTr) in human cell lines has been proposed as a first-tier screening approach for determining the types of bioactivity a chemical can cause (activation of specific targets vs. generalized cell stress) and for calculating transcriptional points of departure (tPODs) based on changes in gene expression. In the present study, we examine a range of computational methods to calculate tPODs from HTTr data, using six data sets in which MCF7 cells cultured in two different media formulations were treated with a panel of 44 chemicals for 3 different exposure durations (6, 12, 24 hr). The tPOD calculation methods use data at the level of individual genes and gene set signatures, and compare data processed using the ToxCast Pipeline 2 (tcplfit2), BMDExpress and PLIER (Pathway Level Information ExtractoR). Methods were evaluated by comparing to in vitro PODs from a validated set of high-throughput screening (HTS) assays for a set of estrogenic compounds. Key findings include: (1) for a given chemical and set of experimental conditions, tPODs calculated by different methods can vary by several orders of magnitude; (2) tPODs are at least as sensitive to computational methods as to experimental conditions; (3) in comparison to an external reference set of PODs, some methods give generally higher values, principally PLIER and BMDExpress; and (4) the tPODs from HTTr in this one cell type are mostly higher than the overall PODs from a broad battery of targeted in vitro ToxCast assays, reflecting the need to test chemicals in multiple cell types and readout technologies for in vitro hazard screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua A Harrill
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Logan J Everett
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Derik E Haggard
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE), USA
| | - Joseph L Bundy
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Clinton M Willis
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA; Oak Ridge Associated Universities (ORAU), USA
| | - Imran Shah
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Katie Paul Friedman
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA
| | - Danilo Basili
- Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, UK
| | - Alistair Middleton
- Unilever Safety and Environmental Assurance Centre (SEAC), Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire MK44 1LQ, UK
| | - Richard S Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Read-across continues to be a popular data gap filling technique within category and analogue approaches. One of the main issues hindering read-across acceptance is the notion of addressing and reducing uncertainties. Frameworks and formats have been created to help facilitate read-across development, evaluation, and residual uncertainties. However, read-across remains an expert-driven approach with each assessment decided on its own merits with no objective means of evaluating performance or quantifying uncertainties. Here, the underlying motivation of creating an algorithmic approach to read-across, namely the Generalised Read-Across (GenRA) approach, is described. The overall objectives of the approach were to quantify performance and uncertainty. Progress made in quantifying the impact of each similarity context commonly relied upon as part of read-across assessment are discussed. The framework underpinning the approach, the software tools developed to date and how GenRA can be used to make and interpret predictions as part of a screening level hazard assessment decision context are illustrated. Future directions and some of the overarching issues still needed in this field and the extent to which GenRA might facilitate those needs are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Patlewicz
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Imran Shah
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Patlewicz G, Richard AM, Williams AJ, Judson RS, Thomas RS. Towards reproducible structure-based chemical categories for PFAS to inform and evaluate toxicity and toxicokinetic testing. Comput Toxicol 2022; 24:10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100250. [PMID: 36969381 PMCID: PMC10031514 DOI: 10.1016/j.comtox.2022.100250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a class of synthetic chemicals that are in widespread use and present concerns for persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Whilst a handful of PFAS have been characterised for their hazard profiles, the vast majority of PFAS have not been studied. The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) undertook a research project to screen ~150 PFAS through an array of different in vitro high throughput toxicity and toxicokinetic tests in order to inform chemical category and read-across approaches. A previous publication described the rationale behind the selection of an initial set of 75 PFAS, whereas herein, we describe how various category approaches were applied and extended to inform the selection of a second set of 75 PFAS from our library of approximately 430 commercially procured PFAS. In particular, we focus on the challenges in grouping PFAS for prospective analysis and how we have sought to develop and apply objective structure-based categories to profile the testing library and other PFAS inventories. We additionally illustrate how these categories can be enriched with other information to facilitate read-across inferences once experimental data become available. The availability of flexible, objective, reproducible and chemically intuitive categories to explore PFAS constitutes an important step forward in prioritising PFAS for further testing and assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace Patlewicz
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Ann M. Richard
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Antony J. Williams
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Richard S. Judson
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| | - Russell S. Thomas
- Center for Computational Toxicology and Exposure (CCTE), Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, 109 TW Alexander Dr, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA
| |
Collapse
|