1
|
de Graaf L, Bresson M, Boulanger M, Bureau M, Lecluse Y, Lebailly P, Baldi I. Pesticide exposure in greenspaces: Comparing field measurement of dermal contamination with values predicted by registration models. Sci Total Environ 2024; 919:170816. [PMID: 38346656 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
Since 2014, the Agricultural Operator Exposure Model (AOEM) has been the harmonised European model used for estimating non-dietary operator exposure to pesticide. It is based on studies conducted by the pesticide companies and it features 13 different crops including non-agricultural areas such as amenity grasslands. The objective of this study was to compare the dermal exposure measured during a field study conducted in a non-agricultural area with the corresponding values estimated by the model AOEM. The non-controlled field study was conducted in France in 2011 and included 24 private and public gardeners who apply glyphosate with knapsack sprayers. Dermal exposure was measured using the whole-body method and cotton gloves. Each measured value had an estimated value given by AOEM and we tested their correlation using linear regression. The model overestimated body exposure for all observations and there was no correlation between values. However, it underestimated hand exposure by 42 times and it systematically underestimated the exposure when the operators were wearing gloves, especially during the application. The model failed at being conservative regarding hand exposure and highly overestimated the protection afforded by the gloves. At a time of glyphosate renewed approval in Europe, non-controlled field studies conducted by academics are needed to improve AOEM model, especially in the non-agricultural sector. Indeed, among the 34 studies included in the model, none were conducted on a non-agricultural area and only four assessed the exposure when using a knapsack sprayer. Moreover, knapsack sprayers being the main equipment used worldwide in both agricultural and non-agricultural settings, it is also crucial to integrate new data specific to this equipment in the model. Operator exposure should be estimated with accuracy in the registration process of pesticides to ensure proper safety as well as in epidemiological studies to improve exposure assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L de Graaf
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France.
| | - M Bresson
- INSERM, UMR1086-Cancers et Préventions, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; University Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - M Boulanger
- INSERM, UMR1086-Cancers et Préventions, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; University Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - M Bureau
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| | - Y Lecluse
- INSERM, UMR1086-Cancers et Préventions, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - P Lebailly
- INSERM, UMR1086-Cancers et Préventions, Centre François Baclesse, Caen, France; University Caen Normandie, Caen, France
| | - I Baldi
- Univ. Bordeaux, INSERM, BPH, U1219, F-33000 Bordeaux, France; Service Santé Travail Environnement, CHU de Bordeaux, F-33000 Bordeaux, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tolnai Z, Széll Z, Marucci G, Pozio E, Sréter T. Environmental determinants of the spatial distribution of Trichinella britovi and Trichinella spiralis in Hungary. Vet Parasitol 2014; 204:426-9. [PMID: 24867274 DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.04.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2013] [Revised: 04/02/2014] [Accepted: 04/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Trichinella spiralis and Trichinella britovi are the two most common species of the genus Trichinella persisting in the European wildlife. To investigate the spatial distribution of these Trichinella spp. and the factors influencing their circulation in Hungary, 3304 red foxes (Vulpes vulpes) and 0.29 million wild boars (Sus scrofa) were tested for Trichinella sp. infection in Hungary from 2006 to 2013. Trichinella spp. larvae from 68 (2.06%) foxes and 44 (0.015%) wild boars were identified by a multiplex PCR as T. britovi or T. spiralis. The locality of origin of foxes and wild boars were recorded in a geographic information system database. There was no correlation between environmental parameters in the home range of foxes and wild boars and the T. spiralis larval counts, but there was a positive correlation between the boundary zone of Hungary and T. spiralis infection (P<0.0001; odds ratio: 24.1). These results indicate that the distribution of T. spiralis in the Hungarian wildlife is determined by the transborder transmission of the parasite from the surrounding endemic countries. Multiple regression analysis was performed with environmental parameter values and T. britovi larval counts. Based on the statistical analysis, non-agricultural areas (forests, scrubs, herbaceous vegetation and pastures) and the mean annual temperature (P<0.0001; odds ratios: 9.53 and 0.61) were the major determinants of the spatial distribution of T. britovi in Hungary. The positive relationship with non-agricultural areas can be explained by the generalist feeding behaviour including scavenging of foxes in these areas. The negative relationship with the mean annual temperature can be attributed to the slower decomposition of wildlife carcasses favouring a longer survival of T. britovi larvae in the host carrion and to the increase of scavenging of foxes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Tolnai
- Laboratory of Parasitology, Fish and Bee Diseases, Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, Tábornok utca 2, H-1143 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Z Széll
- Laboratory of Parasitology, Fish and Bee Diseases, Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, Tábornok utca 2, H-1143 Budapest, Hungary
| | - G Marucci
- Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Immunomediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanitá, viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - E Pozio
- Department of Infectious, Parasitic and Immunomediated Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanitá, viale Regina Elena 299, 00161 Rome, Italy
| | - T Sréter
- Laboratory of Parasitology, Fish and Bee Diseases, Veterinary Diagnostic Directorate, National Food Chain Safety Office, Tábornok utca 2, H-1143 Budapest, Hungary.
| |
Collapse
|