A Cross-sectional Real-life Study of the Prevalence, Severity, and Determinants of Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Fatty Liver Disease in Type 2 Diabetes Patients

Background and Aims

Most data on liver assessment in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients are from retrospective cohorts with selection bias. We aimed at appraising the feasibility, results, and benefits of an outpatient systematic noninvasive screening for metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) severity and determinants in T2DM patients.

Methods

We conducted a 50-week cross-sectional study enrolling adult T2DM outpatients from a diabetes clinic. An algorithm based on guidelines was applied using simple bioclinical scores and, if applicable, ultrasound and/or elastometry.

Results

Two hundred and thirteen patients were included. Mean age and body mass index were 62 years and 31 kg/m2 and 29% of patients had abnormal transaminase levels. The acceptance rate of additional liver examinations was 92%. The prevalence of MAFLD, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 87%, 11%, and 4%, respectively. More than half of the cases of advanced fibrosis had not been suspected and were detected by this screening. MAFLD was associated with poor glycemic control, elevated transaminases, low HDL-C and the absence of peripheral arterial disease. Advanced fibrosis was linked to high waist circumference and excessive alcohol consumption, which should be interpreted with caution owing to the small number of patients reporting excessive consumption.

Conclusions

Simple bioclinical tools allowed routine triage of T2DM patients for MAFLD severity, with high adherence of high-risk patients to subsequent noninvasive exams.

Non-invasive tools for compensated advanced chronic liver disease and portal hypertension after Baveno VII - an update

Non-invasive tests (NITs) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in particular, have entered clinical practice over 20 years ago as point-of-care tests to diagnose liver fibrosis in patients with compensated chronic liver disease. Since then, NITs use has evolved thanks to a large number of studies in all major etiologies of liver disease, and they have become important tools to stratify the risk of portal hypertension and liver-related events. The Baveno VII consensus workshop provided several novel recommendations regarding the use of well-established and novel NITs in the specific setting of portal hypertension screening, diagnosis and follow-up. The Baveno VII expert panels paid special attention to summarizing the existing data into simple clinical rules able to guide clinicians in their practice. The "rule of five" for LSM is a tool to stratify the risk of liver-related events, and LSM alone or in combination with platelet count, can be used now to rule-in and rule-out compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) and clinically significant portal hypertension, as well as to rule-out high-risk varices. Use of NITs in obese subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and patients with viral hepatitis C that has been successfully treated, require specific knowledge. This review will update the reader on these aspects.

Transient Elastography and Serum-Based Tests for Diagnosis of Fatty Liver and Advanced Fibrosis in a Community Cohort: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

BACKGROUND

Noninvasive tests (NITs) are necessary for knowing the true prevalence of fatty liver (FL) and advanced fibrosis. NITs for diagnosis of FL and fibrosis were compared.

METHODS

Data were obtained from the National Health and Examination Survey (2017-2018). Participants were excluded with other liver diseases, missing data for NIT calculation, and/or excessive alcohol use. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) compared the accuracy of 4 FL NITs (CAP, HSI, FLI, USFLI) among themselves and to CAP value of 285 dB/m and 5 fibrosis NITs (transient elastography, APRI, NFS, FIB-4, HEPAmet) among themselves and to LSM ≥8.7 kPa.

RESULTS

Among 2,051 participants (average age 47 (±17.7), 48% males, 62% white, 73% overweight/obese, 39% metabolic syndrome), demographics were similar among NIT groups (CAP = 812; HSI = 1,234; FLI = 935; USFLI-824). FL prevalence by NIT: 39% CAP, 58% HSI, 47% FLI, 37% USFLI. Advanced fibrosis prevalence by test: LSM (≥8.7 kPa) 10-14%; FIB-4 (≥2.67) and APRI (≥0.7) 1.3-2.7%; HEPAmet (>0.47) 14-21%. Compared to CAP ≥285, FLI (AUROC = 0.823) and USFLI (AUROC = 0.833) performed better than HSI (AUROC: 0.798). Compared to LSM ≥8.7 kPa, only NFS (AUROC = 0.722) performed well (FIB-4 AUROC = 0.606; APRI = 0.647; HEPAmet = 0.629). Among the CAP cohort, the strongest FL predictor was obesity (OR: 15.2, 95% CI: 7.97-28.9, p < 0.001); the only fibrosis predictor was elevated AST (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.00-1.12, p = 0.04). The addition of CAP or LSM as a second NIT reduced the number of indeterminate patients especially for FL.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of diagnostic method in 2017-2018, the prevalence of NAFLD was >35%. NITs for FL performed well but not for advanced fibrosis. CAP and LSM as a second NIT reduced those considered indeterminate.

Development and Validation of a Score for Fibrotic Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Noninvasive assessment of histological features of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has been an intensive research area over the last decade. Herein, we aimed to develop a simple noninvasive score using routine laboratory tests to identify, among individuals at high risk for NAFLD, those with fibrotic nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) defined as NASH, NAFLD activity score ≥4, and fibrosis stage ≥2.

METHODS

The derivation cohort included 264 morbidly obese individuals undergoing intraoperative liver biopsy in Rome, Italy. The best predictive model was developed and internally validated using a bootstrapping stepwise logistic regression analysis (2000 bootstrap samples). Performance was estimated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). External validation was assessed in 3 independent European cohorts (Finland, n = 370; Italy, n = 947; England, n = 5368) of individuals at high risk for NAFLD.

RESULTS

The final predictive model, designated as Fibrotic NASH Index (FNI), combined aspartate aminotransferase, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and hemoglobin A1c. The performance of FNI for fibrotic NASH was satisfactory in both derivation and external validation cohorts (AUROC = 0.78 and AUROC = 0.80-0.95, respectively). In the derivation cohort, rule-out and rule-in cutoffs were 0.10 for sensitivity ≥0.89 (negative predictive value, 0.93) and 0.33 for specificity ≥0.90 (positive predictive value, 0.57), respectively. In the external validation cohorts, sensitivity ranged from 0.87 to 1 (negative predictive value, 0.99-1) and specificity from 0.73 to 0.94 (positive predictive value, 0.12-0.49) for rule-out and rule-in cutoff, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FNI is an accurate, simple, and affordable noninvasive score which can be used to screen for fibrotic NASH in individuals with dysmetabolism in primary health care.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: use of diagnostic biomarkers and modalities in clinical practice

INTRODUCTION

The global burden of liver disease is increasing, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is among the most common chronic liver diseases in Asia, Europe, North and South America. The field of noninvasive diagnostic and their role in staging, but also predicting outcome is evolving rapidly. There is a high-unmet need to stage patients with NAFLD and to identify the subset of patients at risk of progression to end-stage liver disease.

AREAS COVERED

The review covers all established diagnostic blood-based and imaging biomarkers to stage and grade NAFLD. Noninvasive surrogate scores are put into perspective of the available evidence and recommended use. The outlook includes genetics, combined algorithms, and artificial intelligence that will allow clinicians to guide and support the management in both early and later disease stages.

EXPERT OPINION

In the future, these diagnostics tests will help clinicians to establish patient care pathways and support the identification of relevant subgroups for monitoring and pharmacotherapy. In addition, researchers will be guided to better understand available scores and support the development of future prediction systems. These will likely include multiparametric aspects of the disease and machine learning algorithms will refine their use and integration with large datasets.

Preferred Noninvasive Testing for Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND

There has been an increased interest in the use of noninvasive tests (NITs) to identify advanced liver fibrosis in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NALFD). The aim of our study was to define the change in tests' characteristics (sensitivity and specificity) of different combinations of NITs to detect advanced fibrosis in NAFLD.

METHODS

We stratified NITs into first and second tiers and compared two different strategies of combining NITs to screen for advanced fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. One strategy was using NITs in parallel, and the other was using NITs sequentially. Within both of these strategies, there were two ways of interpreting the overall results. The first way was called "the AND rule," where a positive result required both individual test results to be positive. The second way was called "the OR rule," where a positive result required only one individual test to be positive. Accuracy of NITs was obtained from the literature search. Combined accuracy and likelihood ratio (LR) were calculated.

RESULTS

Combination testing with parallel and sequential order testing under the AND Rule resulted in overall higher specificity and LR+ then using the NITs alone. Specificity ranged from 0.91 to 0.99, and LR+ from 9.3 to 68.6. The subsequent use of MRE was associated with LR+ between 36 and 69. Sensitivity was higher with parallel and sequential order testing under the OR Rule. LR+ ranged from 1.4 to 7.5, and sensitivity from 0.82 to 0.98.

CONCLUSION

Screening for advanced fibrosis should be performed sequentially, with positive results confirmed by additional testing. Specificity and LR+ were highest when MRE was employed as the confirmatory test.

Changes of FibroScan, APRI, and FIB-4 in chronic hepatitis B patients with significant liver histological changes receiving 3-year entecavir therapy

Noninvasive fibrosis tests have been used widely for evaluation of liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to investigate the influence of antiviral treatment on FibroScan, APRI, and FIB-4 in CHB patients with significant liver histological changes (SLHC) defined as inflammatory grade ≥ A2 and/or fibrosis stage ≥ F2. A total of 104 CHB patients with SLHC at the baseline were included. FibroScan, APRI, and FIB-4 values were compared before and after 3-year entecavir (ETV) treatment. Liver stiffness measurement values decreased significantly after 3-year ETV treatment in cirrhosis group (from 13.6 to 9.6 kPa, p = 0.018), significant fibrosis group (from 8.4 to 5.8 kPa, p = 0.001), and mild fibrosis group (from 5.5 to 4 kPa, p < 0.001). APRI decreased significantly after 3-year ETV treatment in patients with cirrhosis (from 0.80 to 0.25, p < 0.001), patients with significant fibrosis (from 0.54 to 0.24, p < 0.001), and those with mild fibrosis (from 0.35 to 0.23, p < 0.001). FIB-4 decreased significantly after 3-year ETV treatment in patients with cirrhosis (from 1.27 to 0.81, p = 0.007) and significant fibrosis (from 1.12 to 0.78, p < 0.001), while did not decrease significantly in patients with mild fibrosis (from 0.90 to 0.80, p = 0.389). FibroScan, APRI, and FIB-4 values decreased significantly after 3-year ETV treatment in CHB patients, which indicates that these noninvasive fibrosis tests might be useful for monitoring regression of liver fibrosis and assessing treatment efficacy during long-term ETV treatment.