1
|
Liu Y, Liu X, He H, Zhang T, Chai X. Synthesizing nuclear power plant fouling with fractal characteristics enables an in-depth study of concerned nuclear safety issues. iScience 2024; 27:108789. [PMID: 38292425 PMCID: PMC10825680 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2024.108789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Revised: 11/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Fouling deposit on nuclear fuel cladding causes wick boiling and boron hideout, resulting in localized corrosion and power shift with great potential security and economic risks. Herein, a cost-effective time-saving adjustable reproduction method combining sol-gel with ceramic sintering is presented to enable wide coverage of fouling's morphologies and microstructures. Based on fractal analysis, structurally self-similar fouling deposits from different reactors conform to proposed porosity-fractal dimension law under 3% relative error. Wick boiling and boron hideout numerical simulation based on fractal dimension is implemented to treat different morphologies and structures in a unified way. Cladding surface underneath fouling deposit has a maximum 9.243 K temperature increasement due to thermal resistance, and H3BO3 is concentrated 11.274 times by mean of wick boiling, causing Li2B4O7 precipitation under extreme conditions with low porosity and high heat flux. The insights in this study provide a precise approach for quantitative evaluation of localized corrosion and power shift.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan Liu
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Xiaojing Liu
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Hui He
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Tengfei Zhang
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| | - Xiang Chai
- School of Mechanical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Smith H, Cordara T, Gausse C, Pepper SE, Corkhill CL. Oxidative dissolution of Cr-doped UO 2 nuclear fuel. Npj Mater Degrad 2023; 7:25. [PMID: 37041969 PMCID: PMC10079487 DOI: 10.1038/s41529-023-00347-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
Alternative UO2 nuclear fuels, incorporating Cr as a dopant, are currently in use in light-water reactors. Dissolution experiments using Cr-doped UO2, performed as a function of Cr content in a simplified groundwater solution and under oxic conditions, established that the addition of Cr to the UO2 matrix systematically reduced the normalised dissolution rate of U at 25 and 40 °C. This effect was most notable under dilute solution conditions, and is the result of galvanic coupling between Cr and U, resulting from the presence of Cr2+ in the UO2 matrix, as corroborated by activation energy determination. Under conditions of solution saturation, where schoepite ((UO2)8O2(OH)12·(H2O)12) and Na2U2O7·6H2O were identified as secondary phases, the rate of U dissolution was invariant with Cr content. Moreover, at 60 °C, the trend was reversed and the rate of U dissolution increased with increasing Cr content. Under these conditions, other factors, including U solubility or bicarbonate-surface interactions, exert a stronger influence on the U dissolution kinetics than Cr. Increased grain size, a feature of Cr-doped UO2 fuel, was also found to reduce the normalised dissolution rate of U. In establishing the mechanisms by which Cr dopants influence UO2 fuel dissolution, it can be concluded that, overall, Cr-doped UO2 nuclear fuel possesses similar dissolution kinetics to undoped UO2 fuel, giving confidence for its eventual disposal in a geological facility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Smith
- NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Théo Cordara
- NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Clémence Gausse
- NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sarah E. Pepper
- NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Claire L. Corkhill
- NucleUS Immobilisation Science Laboratory, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Herth MM, Ametamey S, Antuganov D, Bauman A, Berndt M, Brooks AF, Bormans G, Choe YS, Gillings N, Häfeli UO, James ML, Kopka K, Kramer V, Krasikova R, Madsen J, Mu L, Neumaier B, Piel M, Rösch F, Ross T, Schibli R, Scott PJH, Shalgunov V, Vasdev N, Wadsak W, Zeglis BM. On the consensus nomenclature rules for radiopharmaceutical chemistry - Reconsideration of radiochemical conversion. Nucl Med Biol 2020; 93:19-21. [PMID: 33232876 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2020.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Radiochemical conversion is an important term to be included in the "Consensus nomenclature rules for radiopharmaceutical chemistry". Radiochemical conversion should be used to define reaction efficiency by measuring the transformation of components in a crude reaction mixture at a given time, whereas radiochemical yield is better suited to define the efficiency of an entire reaction process including, for example, separation, isolation, filtration, and formulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthias M Herth
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Simon Ametamey
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Dmitrii Antuganov
- Almazov Northwest Federal Medical Research Center, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, ul. Akkuratova 2, St. Petersburg 197341, Russia
| | - Andreas Bauman
- Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Basel Hospital, Petersgraben 4, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
| | - Mathias Berndt
- Life Molecular Imaging GmbH, Tegeler Str. 6-7, D-13353 Berlin, Germany
| | - Allen F Brooks
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Guy Bormans
- Laboratory for Radiopharmaceutical Research, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, box 821, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yearn Seong Choe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Nic Gillings
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Urs O Häfeli
- Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Michelle L James
- Department of Radiology and Department of Neurology and Neurological Sciences Molecular Imaging Program at Stanford (MIPS), Stanford University School of Medicine, 1201 Welch Road, P-206, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Bautzner Landstraße 400, D-01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Vasko Kramer
- Positronpharma SA, Providencia, 7500921 Santiago, Chile
| | - Raisa Krasikova
- N.P. Bechtereva Institute of Human Brain, Russian Academy of Science, Laboratory of Radiochemistry, 9 Ak. Pavlova St., 197376 St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - Jacob Madsen
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine & PET, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Linjing Mu
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Bernd Neumaier
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
| | - Markus Piel
- Department of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Fritz-Strassmann-Weg 2, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Frank Rösch
- Department of Chemistry, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Fritz-Strassmann-Weg 2, D-55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Tobias Ross
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, D-30625 Hannover, Germany
| | - Roger Schibli
- Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, ETH Zurich, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 1-5/10, 8093 Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Peter J H Scott
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical School, 1301 Catherine St, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA
| | - Vladimir Shalgunov
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Jagtvej 160, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Neil Vasdev
- Azrieli Centre for Neuro-Radiochemistry, Brain Health Imaging Centre, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health & Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, 250 College St., Toronto M5T-1R8, ON, Canada
| | - Wolfgang Wadsak
- Department of Biomedical Imaging und Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, A-1090 Vienna, Austria
| | - Brian M Zeglis
- Department of Chemistry, Hunter College of the City University of New York, New York, NY, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coenen HH, Gee AD, Adam M, Antoni G, Cutler CS, Fujibayashi Y, Jeong JM, Mach RH, Mindt TL, Pike VW, Windhorst AD. Consensus nomenclature rules for radiopharmaceutical chemistry - Setting the record straight. Nucl Med Biol 2017; 55:v-xi. [PMID: 29074076 DOI: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2017.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Accepted: 09/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Over recent years, within the community of radiopharmaceutical sciences, there has been an increased incidence of incorrect usage of established scientific terms and conventions, and even the emergence of 'self-invented' terms. In order to address these concerns, an international Working Group on 'Nomenclature in Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and related areas' was established in 2015 to achieve clarification of terms and to generate consensus on the utilisation of a standardised nomenclature pertinent to the field. Upon open consultation, the following consensus guidelines were agreed, which aim to.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Thomas L Mindt
- Ludwig Boltzmann Institute Applied Diagnostics, Vienna, Austria
| | | | | |
Collapse
|