High adherence to intermittent and continuous use of a contraceptive vaginal ring among women in a randomized controlled trial in Kigali, Rwanda

Background

The introduction of female-initiated drug-delivery methods, including vaginal rings, have proven to be a promising avenue to address sexually transmitted infections and unintended pregnancies, which disproportionally affects women and girls in sub-Saharan Africa. Efficient uptake of existing and new technologies such as vaginal rings requires in depth understanding of product adherence. This remains a major challenge as data on adherence to vaginal rings from African countries is limited. In this study, we explored adherence of contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing®) use in Kigali, Rwanda using a mixed methods approach.

Methods

We collected quantitative and qualitative data at multiple time points from women participating in a clinical trial exploring the safety and acceptability of either intermittent or continuous use of the NuvaRing®. Various adherence categories were used including monthly and cumulative adherence measurement. The quantitative data were analysed using R and the qualitative data were analysed using a deductive, content-analytical approach based on categories related to the quantitative adherence measures. All data were compared and triangulated.

Results

Data from 120 enrolled participants showed that self-reported adherence was high at every study visit in both study groups. At first study visit 80% of the intermittent ring users and 79.7% of the continuous ring users reported perfect adherence (assessed as "the ring was never out"). Reporting of ring expulsions and removals were highest (28.3%) at the beginning of the trial. Self-reported perfect ring adherence increased during the study and reports of ring expulsions and removals declined as familiarity with this contraceptive method increased. The percentage of women with perfect cumulative adherence was non-significantly higher in the intermittent (61.7%) than in the continuous use group (54.3%). The low rate of discrepant adherence data after triangulation (6%) is in line with the perception of the participants as adherent throughout the study.

Conclusions

Self-reported adherence in both study groups was high with removals and expulsions being within the expected product range. Comprehensive adherence data triangulation allowed for a deeper understanding of context-driven behaviour that shaped adherence patterns and challenges. Our data categorisation and triangulation approach has shown potential for implementation in future vaginal ring studies aiming to better understand and measure adherence.

Endovascular Thrombectomy and Lysis for Acute Renal Vein Thrombosis: Indications, Technical Aspects, Outcome, and Disease Etiology

PURPOSE

To report a rare case of acute renal vein thrombosis (RVT) that was treated with endovascular thrombectomy and lysis, and discuss potential etiology and indications for catheter-directed management.

CASE REPORT

A 21-year-old female athlete presented with sudden pain in her left flank and vomiting. A 3-phase computed tomography (CT) angiogram identified total occlusion of the left renal vein with no excretion from the swollen tender left kidney. Catheter-directed thrombolysis and thrombectomy were initiated 24 hours after onset of symptoms. Complete resolution of the RVT with normalized renal function was achieved. Post-operative Doppler ultrasound scan confirmed normal renal resistance and flow in the renal vein. The patient was discharged on Apixaban and remains well at 6 months. Combined hormonal contraception via an intra-vaginal ring and raised Factor VIII activity were the only identified risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Acute complete RVT with impaired kidney function is rare. Combined hormonal contraception and increased Factor VIII activity were potential risk factors. Endovascular thrombectomy and lysis restored renal perfusion and function, and can be used effectively in the management of fit patients with acutely compromised kidney function from total renal vein obstruction.

Experiences and attitudes towards Menstrual Suppression among Women with Bacterial vaginosis Randomised to Continuous Use of NuvaRing in Kenya

Background

The contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing), one of the Multipurpose Prevention Technologies (MPT) products, is effective in preventing unintended pregnancies and may contribute to reducing the frequency of Bacterial Vaginosis (BV), which is a risk factor for HIV acquisition, transmission, and shedding among women. NuvaRing may cause irregular menstruation, including menstrual suppression, which may influence women's decision on product choice, use, and acceptability. In this prospective cohort study, we assessed women's experiences with menstruation suppression following continued NuvaRing use.

Methods

A total of 18 in-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide among purposively selected women with BV in Thika, Kenya, aged 18-40 years, who used NuvaRing continuously. All women received counseling on possibility of menstrual suppression following continuous NuvaRing use. Audio recordings were transcribed verbatim and thematically analyzed.

Results

Participants who expected and were aware that menstrual suppression was a possible side effect of Nuvaring accepted its benefits, and expressed acceptance and desire to continue using NuvaRing. Participants who had not anticipated menstrual suppression expressed anxiety and fear, with some expressing desire to continue using NuvaRing but worried about unintended negative consequences. The ability to perform daily activities uninterrupted, reduced expenses on sanitary supplies, enhanced sexual pleasure and relationships, and absence of menstrual pain were benefits of menstrual suppression. Although all participants received counseling on menstrual suppression, some expressed anxiety over the possibility of unintended pregnancy. As a result, they frequented medical facilities for health check-ups and pregnancy tests, and some used combined oral contraceptives to induce menses.

Conclusion

Understanding perceptions regarding menstrual suppression is crucial in offering targeted and comprehensive counseling to improve women's understanding of menstruation suppression to influence acceptance and use of NuvaRing. Additionally, improved male involvement in reproductive health concerns and women's autonomy in discussing reproductive health issues with partners is essential.

Surface roughness of different contraceptive vaginal rings: evaluation by scanning electron microscope (SEM)

Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate whether the compositions of the ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) membrane of two different contraceptive vaginal rings could influence the surface roughness, which is associated with the possible accumulation of vaginal biomass on the rings during use.Methods: We measured and compared the surface roughness of unused vaginal rings, NuvaRing and Ornibel, using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and dedicated software that can convert SEM images into 3D models. Average roughness (Ra), average quadratic roughness (Rq) and mean height of the irregularities at 10 points (Rz) were calculated.Results: Different thicknesses of the EVA membranes between the two rings were noted. No significant differences were found between the two rings in the three evaluated values of surface roughness (NuvaRing vs Ornibel, respectively: Ra, 1.53 ± 0.14 vs 1.61 ± 0.14 µm, p = 0.141; Rq, 2.03 ± 0.25 vs 2.07 ± 0.16 µm, p = 0.688; Rz, 11.4 ± 3.1 vs 11.4 ± 2.4 µm, p = 0.987).Conclusion: The different composition of the vaginal rings' EVA membrane is not associated with different surface roughness. Ornibel is equivalent to NuvaRing in terms of surface roughness, despite the different composition of the membrane polymers.

Efficacy and safety of the contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing) compared with a combined oral contraceptive in Chinese women: a 1-year randomised trial

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and tolerability of the monthly vaginal ring (NuvaRing; 15 μg ethinylestradiol [EE] and 120 μg etonogestrel per day) compared with a monophasic (21/7) combined oral contraceptive (COC) containing 30 μg EE and 3 mg drospirenone in healthy Chinese women aged 18-40 years.

METHODS

This was a phase III, open-label, randomised multicentre trial conducted in China. Participants received NuvaRing or COC for 13 cycles (3 weeks of ring/pill treatment followed by a 1-week ring-free/pill-free period). Contraceptive efficacy was assessed by in-treatment pregnancies and expressed by the Pearl Index (PI; number of pregnancies/100 woman-years of use). Cycle control was assessed by unscheduled (breakthrough) and absence of scheduled (withdrawal) bleeding events. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

Participants were randomised either to the NuvaRing (n = 732) or to the COC (n = 214); 588 (82.4%) and 182 (78.4%) participants, respectively, completed the study. There were 10 in-treatment pregnancies in the NuvaRing group (PI 1.92; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.92, 3.53) and five in the COC group (PI 3.12; 95% CI 1.01, 7.29). Breakthrough bleeding/spotting ranged from 18.6% (Cycle 1) to 4.2% (Cycle 11) for NuvaRing and from 21.6% (Cycle 1) to 7.9% (Cycle 11) for COC. Absence of withdrawal bleeding ranged from 8.6% (Cycle 1) to 3.0% (Cycle 11) for NuvaRing and from 14.6% (Cycle 1) to 6.4% (Cycle 5) for COC. For NuvaRing and COC, respectively, 26.6% and 25.0% of participants had treatment-related adverse events, and 7.0% and 9.1% discontinued the study as a result.

CONCLUSIONS

Once-monthly NuvaRing is efficacious and safe for use in Chinese women.

Inadvertent intravesicular placement of a vaginal contraceptive ring: a case report and review of literature

The NuvaRing® is a deformable, ring-shaped hormonal contraceptive device which is typically vaginally self-inserted by the patient. While there are several potential side effects of usage, essentially all of them result from hormone delivery. Complications from incorrect placement are rare. We present the case of a 31 year old female who presented to our emergency department after being unable to retrieve a NuvaRing® for its scheduled removal. CT scan showed a hypodense intravesicular NuvaRing® which the patient had inadvertently placed transurethrally 3 weeks prior. Cystoscopy was performed and retrieval using a 3-pronged grasper was eventually successful after several failed attempts with an alligator grasper. Our purpose in presenting this case is to introduce the reader to a rare complication of incorrect NuvaRing® placement, explain how this complication may occur as a result of NuvaRing® construction/functionality, describe how alternative cystoscopic instruments may aid in cystoscopic retrieval, and review the 3 other case reports of intravesicular NuvaRing® placement to discuss the utility of various imaging modalities when clinical suspicion of the complication is high.

Review of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring, NuvaRing

The purpose of this review was to test contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, tolerability, and acceptability as found in the non-comparative studies with NuvaRing^® by those found in the randomized trials comparing NuvaRing and combined oral contraceptives (COCs). All large non-comparative studies and all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between NuvaRing and a COC up to and including December 2006 were analyzed. Two large multi-center registration studies, 1 large daily clinical practice study, and 6 RCTs comparing NuvaRing and a COC were identified. The findings in the non-comparative studies were confirmed in the RCTs. Contraceptive efficacy was high showing no significant differences in comparison with the COC; cycle control was good and consistently better than that of the COC; compliance was high and comparable with that of the pill; the incidence of adverse events such as breast tenderness, headache, and nausea was low, but not lower than with the COC despite a halving of the systemic exposure to ethinyl estradiol (EE) with NuvaRing compared with a 30-μg EE-containing COC; the incidence of local and ring-related events was low but higher than with the COC, leading to higher discontinuation rates among NuvaRing users; acceptability was high and comparable between both contraceptives, resulting in a global improvement of sexual function with both methods. After study completion, women using NuvaRing were more likely to continue with their method than women using a COC. The good results with respect to contraceptive efficacy, cycle control, tolerability, and acceptability as achieved with NuvaRing in the large non-comparative registration studies were confirmed in the RCTs comparing NuvaRing with different COCs.

Examining the efficacy, safety, and patient acceptability of the combined contraceptive vaginal ring (NuvaRing)

The contraceptive vaginal ring is a novel contraceptive method that offers unique advantages. Intravaginal delivery of both estrogen and progesterone allows continuous release of medication, resulting in lower systemic levels. The use of long-term combined hormonal contraception enables improved cycle control compared with progesterone-only methods. The indications and usage of the NuvaRing^® are described along with the efficacy, tolerability, and safety. Overall, the contraceptive vaginal ring appears to be very effective, with a favorable side-effect profile, and is highly acceptable to most patients.