A systematic review of observational management of cutaneous basal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the commonest cancer in the United Kingdom and United States. Surgical excision is the most common treatment. This review summarises all published outcomes of observational/non-interventional management of cutaneous BCC.

METHODS

This PRISMA-compliant systematic review searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases from inception-June 2021. All studies reporting outcomes of observational management for BCC were included.

RESULTS

We identified 2529 titles, from which 4 full-text articles were eligible, reporting on 2298 individuals. Two studies were randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing histological clearance rates and adverse events following treatment with an inactive strategy (placebo cream) versus topical 5%-imiquimod (at different frequencies) for 6-12 weeks. Clearance rates ranged from 52-100% for imiquimod and 2-19% for placebo, with more adverse events associated with imiquimod. The other two studies used prospective cohort designs. One study assessed the natural history of BCCs managed expectantly in 39 individuals aged ≥80years. During the 15.8-month follow-up, 46.2% of lesions did not increase in size and 10.3% resolved. The remaining study compared treatment patterns of 1360 patients with non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) in individuals with or without limited life-expectancy (LLE). The LLE subgroup had a 5-year mortality rate of 43.3%, with no deaths attributed to NMSC. Only 3.3% of individuals with LLE underwent observational treatment. No study examined quality-of-life or cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

There has been limited investigation of observational management of BCC, despite possible advantages of this strategy. Future RCTs should compare quality-of-life outcomes and utility-adjusted survival following interventional or observational management of BCC.

Decision-Making Criteria for Observational Management of Congenital Pulmonary Airway Malformations (CPAMs)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine practice patterns of Canadian surgeons managing congenital pulmonary airway malformations (CPAMs) and factors influencing practice.

METHODS

Pediatric surgeons in Canada were surveyed regarding their experience, evaluation, and management CPAMs, and what factors they feel qualify patients for observation vs resection. Data were summarized, and Fisher's-Exact and Kruskal-Wallis Tests applied where appropriate.

RESULTS

Sixty eight percent (n=46) of surgeons responded. However, three surveys were incomplete and excluded. The median age of initial assessment by a pediatric surgeon was one month. 98% (42/43) use CXR for initial imaging, and 83% (36/43) recommend CT scan for further evaluation. Observation is offered always, almost always, or sometimes by 2%, 35% and 37%, respectively. Only 16% almost never, and 9% never offer it. Years in practice was not associated with this decision (p=0.41). Of surgeons who offer observation, 78% (28/37) use morphology to guide their decision, and 63% (21/37) use lesion size (<1cm to <5cms). 68%(23/37) consider the number of lesions, and 61%(14/23) of those only offer observation to solitary lesions.

CONCLUSION

Most pediatric surgeons in Canada offer observational management to patients with asymptomatic CPAMs. While practice variations exist, detailed imaging with a CT scan early in life to determine the morphology, size, and number of lesions guides practice.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V.