Chidamide and orelabrutinib synergistically induce cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma by regulating the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway

OBJECTIVE

The initial therapeutic approach for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) entails a rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) regimen. However, 40% of patients exhibit suboptimal responses, with some experiencing relapse and refractory conditions. This study aimed to explore novel therapeutic strategies and elucidate their underlying mechanisms in DLBCL.

METHODS

Bioinformatics techniques were employed to scrutinize correlations between the HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, HDAC10, BTK, MYC, TP53, and BCL2 genes in DLBCL. In vitro experiments were conducted using DB and SU-DHL-4 cells treated with chidamide, orelabrutinib, and a combination of both. Cell viability was assessed by cell counting kit-8. Cell apoptosis and the cell cycle were determined using flow cytometry. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and mitochondrial function were assessed through ROS and JC-1 staining. RNA sequencing and western blot analyses were conducted to elucidate the molecular mechanisms underlying the combined action of chidamide and orelabrutinib in DLBCL cells.

RESULTS

This investigation revealed markedly enhanced antiproliferative effects when chidamide was combined with orelabrutinib. Compusyn software analysis indicated a synergistic effect of chidamide and orelabrutinib in inhibiting DLBCL cell proliferation, with a combination index (CI) < 1. This synergy further manifested as augmented cell cycle arrest, apoptosis induction, the downregulation of cell cycle-associated and antiapoptotic proteins, and the upregulation of proapoptotic proteins. Furthermore, the western blot and RNA-Seq findings suggested that combining chidamide and orelabrutinib modulated the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway, thereby promoting DLBCL cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study provide a compelling justification for the clinical utilization of chidamide and orelabrutinib to treat relapsed/refractory DLBCL.

Efficacy and safety of Orelabrutinib-based regimens in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: a single-center retrospective analysis

Currently, combining chemotherapy with Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) has demonstrated significant effectiveness in treating patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Orelabrutinib is a second-generation BTK inhibitor, and presently, there have been few reports of Orelabrutinib being used to treat DLBCL. We conducted a retrospective investigation to explore the safety and efficacy of Orelabrutinib in combination with chemotherapy or immunotherapy. The study comprised 19 patients with a median age of 61 years. The overall response rate (ORR) was 89.5% with a complete response (CR) rate of 73.7% and a partial response rate (PR) of 15.8%. The estimated 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 78.6% (95%CI, 59.8%-100%) and 72.2% (95% CI, 52.4%-99.6%), respectively, with a median follow-up time of 11 months (range 2-24). The most prevalent grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs), neutropenia (52.6%), anemia (36.8%), thrombocytopenia (26.3%), febrile neutropenia (26.3%), and lung infection (10.5%), were the most common. Our results reveal that Orelabrutinib is an effective therapy for DLBCL patients. Furthermore, our first investigation of the Orelabrutinib application lays a foundation for larger retrospective studies.

Indirect comparisons of efficacy of zanubrutinib versus orelabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma or relapsed or refractory mantle cell lymphoma

We conducted two indirect comparisons to estimate the efficacy of zanubrutinib versus orelabrutinib in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) or R/R mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). An unanchored matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) was performed in R/R CLL/SLL patients. Individual patient data from zanubrutinib trial (BGB-3111-205) were adjusted to match the aggregated data from the orelabrutinib trial (ICP-CL-00103). A naïve comparison was performed in R/R MCL for the different response assessment methodology and efficacy analysis set between the zanubrutinib (BGB-3111-206) and orelabrutinib (ICP-CL-00102) trials. Efficacy outcomes included ORR and PFS. In R/R CLL/SLL patients, after matching, IRC-assessed ORR was comparable (86.6% vs. 92.5%; risk difference, -5.9% [95% CI: -15.8%-3.8%]); IRC-assessed PFS was similar with a favorable trend in zanubrutinib over orelabrutinib (HR, 0.74 [95% CI: 0.37-1.47]) and the 18-month PFS rate was numerically higher in zanubrutinib (82.9% vs. 78.7%). In R/R MCL patients, naïve comparison showed investigator-assessed ORR was similar (83.7% vs. 87.9%; risk difference, -4.2% [95% CI: -14.8%-6.0%]), and CR rate was significantly higher in zanubrutinib over orelabrutinib (77.9% vs. 42.9%; risk difference, 35.0% [95% CI: 14.5%, 53.7%]). Investigator-assessed PFS was similar with a favorable trend (HR, 0.77 [95% CI: 0.45-1.32]) in zanubrutinib over orelabrutinib and the 12-month PFS rate was numerically higher in zanubrutinib (77.5% vs. 70.8%). MAIC result showed zanubrutinib demonstrated favorable PFS over orelabrutinib for R/R CLL/SLL patients. The naïve comparison showed zanubrutinib had favorable PFS and higher CR rate than orelabrutinib for R/R MCL patients.

Evaluation of orelabrutinib monotherapy in patients with relapsed or refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia in a single-arm, multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND

Orelabrutinib is a novel, small molecule, selective irreversible Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orelabrutinib in patients with relapsed or refractory Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (R/R WM).

METHODS

This is a prospective, multicenter study of orelabrutinib in patients with WM who had at least one prior line of treatment. Orelabrutinib was administered orally at a daily dose of 150 mg until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was major response rate (MRR) assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC) according to IWWM-6. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04440059. This trial was also registered on Center for Drug Evaluation (www.chinadrugtrials.org.cn) in March 2019, with a number of CTR2019036.

FINDINGS

Between August 2019 and December 2020, 66 R/R WM patients were assessed for eligibility. Forty-seven eligible patients were evaluated for efficacy at a median follow-up of 16.4 months (interquartile range: 12.5, 19.5). As assessed by IRC, the MRR was 80.9%, and the overall response rate was 89.4%. The median time to at least a minor response was 1.9 months. The PFS rates was 89.4% at 12 months. For patients with MYD88^L265P /CXCR4^NEG, MYD88^L265P /CXCR4 ^S338X, and MYD88^NEG /CXCR4^NEG mutations, the MRRs were 84.6%, 100%, and 25.0%. Most adverse events were Grades 1 or 2 (91.0%). The common grade 3 or higher adverse events occurring were neutropenia (10.6%), thrombocytopenia (6.4%), and pneumonia (4.3%). Serious adverse events (SAE) occurred in 10 patients (21.3%). One treatment-related death was reported (hepatitis B reactivation).

INTERPRETATION

Orelabrutinib has shown good efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with R/R WM.

FUNDING

InnoCare Pharma.

Orelabrutinib-bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor-based regimens in the treatment of central nervous system lymphoma: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Central nervous system lymphoma (CNSL) is an aggressive lymphoma. Orelabrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is a new treatment strategy for CNSL. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of orelabrutinib-based regimens in the treatment of patients with CNSL.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients with CNSL were included in this retrospective study. All patients received the orelabrutinib-based regimen. Efficacy was evaluated based on investigators' assessment of overall response rate (ORR), complete response/unconfirmed complete response (CR/CRu), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), progressive disease (PD), duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The safety of orelabrutinib-based regimens has also been evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 17.39% of patients received orelabrutinib-based regimens for consolidation therapy, and 82.61% of patients for induction therapy (4 newly diagnosed CNSL, 15 relapsed/refractory CNSL). In the newly diagnosed CNSL group, the ORR was 100% (1 CR, 1 CRu, 2 PR). The 6-month DOR rate, 6-month PFS rate, and 6-month OS rate were 100%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Of the 15 relapsed/refractory CNSL patients, five therapy regimens were applied (orelabrutinib, n = 3; orelabrutinib/immunotherapy, n = 3; orelabrutinib/chemotherapy, n = 2; orelabrutinib/immunochemotherapy, n = 6; orelabrutinib/radiotherapy, n = 1). The ORR was 60.00% (4 CR, 5 PR). The 6-month DOR rate, 6-month PFS rate, and 6-month OS rate were 92.30%, 67.70%, and 70.00%, respectively. Twenty-one patients reported adverse events (AEs), and 6 patients experienced grade ≥ 3 AEs.

CONCLUSION

Orelabrutinib-based regimens were efficacious and well-tolerated in patients with CNSL. These combined therapies offer a new potential therapeutic strategy for patients with CNSL.

Current Role and Emerging Evidence for Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in the Treatment of Mantle Cell Lymphoma

The Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), acalabrutinib, ibrutinib, and zanubrutinib, are all approved in the United States for the treatment of relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). BTKi as a class have become the preferred therapy for most of the patients with relapsed MCL, and ongoing clinical trials are evaluating whether combining BTKi with other targeted agents may deepen response and further improve outcomes. Emerging evidence supports the efficacy of BTKi-containing combinations as frontline treatment, and clinical studies to define the role of this class of drugs for newly diagnosed patients with MCL are in progress.