Do Socioeconomic Inequalities Exist Within Ophthalmology and Orthoptics in the UK?: A Scoping Review

Introduction

It is well documented that socioeconomic disadvantage adversely affects general health and ocular health worldwide. Within orthoptics, while clinicians recognise a relationship between socioeconomic situation and treatment outcome, no previous literature review was found to address this issue. Neither was a UK-specific literature review found to address the same issue for ophthalmology as a whole.

Aim

This literature review evaluates evidence for an association between socioeconomic situation and ophthalmic/orthoptic conditions and their treatment outcomes, specifically within the UK.

Methods

Keyword searches were conducted on Google Scholar and the University of Liverpool library catalogue. Results for the main analyses were limited to full papers, specific to the UK, written in English. Literature was only included from pre-2000 if more recent evidence was insufficient.

Results

There is evidence of socioeconomic disadvantage being associated with the following: reduced visual acuity; reduced attendance at diabetic retinopathy screening appointments; and delayed presentation of glaucoma, cataracts, and diabetic retinopathy. However, evidence linking socioeconomic disadvantage to AMD is mixed. There is limited evidence of the increased prevalence of amblyopia and subsequent barriers to its treatment for socioeconomically underserved children. There is also evidence of a reduction in quality of life for socioeconomically underserved adults with strabismus.

Conclusions

Health inequalities within ophthalmology and orthoptics are reported, but with confounding results for some conditions. Further research should explore the reasons behind the inequalities that are found and identify methods of reducing them.

Vision therapy for intermittent exotropia: A case series

INTRODUCTION

We evaluated the effectiveness of office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with home reinforcement for intermittent exotropia in a private practice environment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective chart review study. Patients who received office-based vision therapy for intermittent exotropia in a private optometric clinic were reviewed. Patients with intermittent exotropia treated with and without strabismus surgery were both included. The pre-therapy baseline data were compared to the re-evaluation data obtained at the last therapy session. All patients received office-based vergence/accommodative therapy administered by a trained therapist during a 60 min office visit every one to two weeks, combined with home reinforcement for a minimum of 15 min, five times per week. The primary outcome measure in this study was the change in the Office Control Score from the pre-therapy visit to the post-therapy visit. The hypothesis was that office-based vergence/accommodative therapy would significantly improve the Office Control Score.

RESULTS

Forty patients aged from 5 to 22 years old fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Eight of them were postoperative patients. After treatment, there was a change of -1.1 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001, z = 3.73, effect size: 0.42) and -1.1 ± 1.4 (p < 0.001, z = 4.26, effect size: 0.48) in distance and near Office Control Score, respectively. In the subgroup analysis, significant improvements in the Office Control Score were observed in both the operated and unoperated intermittent exotropes at distance and near.

CONCLUSION

This study showed that office-based vergence/accommodative therapy with home reinforcement significantly improved the distance and near control of exodeviation in both operated and unoperated intermittent exotropia patients in a private practice environment.

Vergence and accommodation disorders in children with vertigo: A need for evidence-based diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Previous clinical evaluations have demonstrated a difference in eye movements in healthy children compared to children with vertigo without vestibular pathology. It has also been previously shown that accommodation and vergence responses can be measured with remote haploscopic photo refractor (RHP) devices. We have developed a method, called REMOBI (patent US8851669, WO2011073288) that allows us to test eye movements in three-dimensional space without decoupling vergence and accommodation.[1].

METHODS

We compared standard clinical testing of vergence and accommodation responses separately, with laboratory simultaneous measurement of vergence and accommodation in healthy children, 31 with vertigo (mean age 11 SD +/- 3.02), and 53 without (mean age 10 SD +/- 3.29). Children diagnosed with vertigo then underwent orthoptic rehabilitation for vergence and accommodation disorders and were re-evaluated twice using laboratory testing: once after 12 sessions and once 3-months after completing the sessions.

FINDINGS

Using the clinical tests, significant differences were found between the vertigo and healthy groups: D' (break point of divergence near), D2 (second measurement of divergence after convergence far), D2' (second measurement of divergence after convergence near), C (break point of convergence far), and C' (break point of convergence near). However, no significant differences in accommodation or vergence were seen between the two groups using laboratory tests (RHP and REMOBI). Further, there was no difference in laboratory measurements in children with vertigo before, after, and 3 months after clinical rehabilitation.

INTERPRETATION

We postulate the difference in these two tests is because the laboratory tests are more accurate and more realistic because they measure accommodation and vergence simultaneously, as it incorporates a stronger binocular coordination response not appreciated by current clinical measurements. Further studies should be conducted to evaluate whether clinicians should consider adding objective measurements, such as using a RHP device, when diagnosing patients with vergence and accommodation disorders, to avoid prescribing costly and timely rehabilitation programs that do not improve accommodative and vergence movements.

FUNDING

We thank the Fulbright Foundation, along with the University of California, San Francisco, for the research fellowship to Lindsey M Ward. This study is part of the PHRC VERVE, hospital research program, run at the hospital Robert Debré and supported by Direction de la Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique, France. The funding sources had no involvement in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing of the manuscript; and in the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Increased onset of vergence adaptation reduces excessive accommodation during the orthoptic treatment of convergence insufficiency

This research tested the hypothesis that the successful treatment of convergence insufficiency (CI) with vision-training (VT) procedures, leads to an increased capacity of vergence adaptation (VAdapt) allowing a more rapid downward adjustment of the convergence accommodation cross-link. Nine subjects with CI were recruited from a clinical population, based upon reduced fusional vergence amplitudes, receded near point of convergence or symptomology. VAdapt and the resulting changes to convergence accommodation (CA) were measured at specific intervals over 15 min (pre-training). Separate clinical measures of the accommodative convergence cross link, horizontal fusion limits and near point of convergence were taken and a symptomology questionnaire completed. Subjects then participated in a VT program composed of 2.5h at home and 1h in-office weekly for 12-14 weeks. Clinical testing was done weekly. VAdapt and CA measures were retaken once clinical measures normalized for 2 weeks (mid-training) and then again when symptoms had cleared (post-training). VAdapt and CA responses as well as the clinical measures were taken on a control group showing normal clinical findings. Six subjects provided complete data sets. CI clinical findings reached normal levels between 4 and 7 weeks of training but symptoms, VAdapt, and CA output remained significantly different from the controls until 12-14 weeks. The hypothesis was retained. The reduced VAdapt and excessive CA found in CI were normalized through orthoptic treatment. This time course was underestimated by clinical findings but matched symptom amelioration.