[A comparative study of the calcaneal closing-wedge calcaneal osteotomy versus posterior-superior prominence removal in both sides with Haglund syndrome]

Objective: To compare the clinical outcome of removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence and that of calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy for Haglund syndrome. Methods: From February 2009 to July 2014, 36 patients with Haglund syndrome were included.They were divided into two groups, and each group included 18 patients and underwent removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence and calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy respectively.They were evaluated preoperatively and after 6 , 12 months and 24 months postoperatively by American Orthopedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, VAS score, VISA-A questionnaire and Maryland Foot Score.Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope of the two groups were compared preoperatively and after 6 months.All data were analysis utilizing SPSS 18.0. Results: At six months of follow-up, the weight-bearing lateral X-rays reveals that removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence did not change Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope and calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy decreased Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope significantly[from preoperation (56.5±5.4)°, (120.0±1.3)°to postoperation (48.4±4.6)°, (109.0±5.3)°]. At six months of follow-up, the AOFAS score, VAS score, VISA-A questionnaire and Maryland Foot Score were worse in the wedge calcaneal osteotomy group.At twelve months of follow-up, no significant difference (P>0.05)was found between the two groups in terms of VAS score, and Maryland Foot Score, while the AOFAS score, and VISA-A questionnaire in the wedge calcaneal osteotomy group were better than those of posterior-superior prominence removal group.At twenty-four months of follow-up, the AOFAS score, VAS score, VISA-A questionnaire and Maryland Foot Score were better in the wedge calcaneal osteotomy group (P<0.05). Conclusions: Both the two surgical methods are effective for Haglund syndrome.Calcaneal closing-wedge osteotomy decreased Fowler-Philip angle and calcaneal posterior slope of calcaneus and its clinical outcome appears better than that removal of calcaneal posterior-superior prominence.

Accuracy and reliability of linear measurements using 3-dimensional computed tomographic imaging software for Le Fort I Osteotomy

Our purpose was to compare the accuracy and reliability of linear measurements for Le Fort I osteotomy using volume rendering software. We studied 11 dried skulls and used cone-beam computed tomography (CT) to generate 3-dimensional images. Linear measurements were based on craniometric anatomical landmarks that were predefined as specifically used for Le Fort I osteotomy, and identified twice each by 2 radiologists, independently, using Dolphin imaging version 11.5.04.35. A third examiner then made physical measurements using digital calipers. There was a significant difference between Dolphin imaging and the gold standard, particularly in the pterygoid process. The largest difference was 1.85mm (LLpPtg L). The mean differences between the physical and the 3-dimensional linear measurements ranged from -0.01 to 1.12mm for examiner 1, and 0 to 1.85mm for examiner 2. Interexaminer analysis ranged from 0.51 to 0.93. Intraexaminer correlation coefficients ranged from 0.81 to 0.96 and 0.57 to 0.92, for examiners 1 and 2, respectively. We conclude that the Dolphin imaging should be used sparingly during Le Fort I osteotomy.