Diffusion-weighted MR enterography for evaluating Crohn's disease: Effect of anti-peristaltic agent on the diagnosis of bowel inflammation

OBJECTIVES

To prospectively investigate how Buscopan affects the diagnosis of bowel inflammation by diffusion-weighted imaging MR enterography (DWI-MRE) in Crohn's disease (CD).

METHODS

Thirty CD patients without previous bowel surgery underwent DWI-MRE (b = 900 sec/mm²) before and after intravenous Buscopan. The 30 patients were randomly divided into two groups; using a crossover design, interpretations were made regarding the presence of restricted mural diffusion (i.e., bowel inflammation) in nine bowel segments in two separate reading sessions by two readers. The readers also judged restricted mural diffusion extent in each bowel segment on two side-by-side DWI-MRE images with a random right-to-left order. Ileocolonoscopy and conventional MRE interpreted by an expert panel were reference standards.

RESULTS

We analyzed 262 bowel segments. DWI-MRE without Buscopan significantly decreased sensitivity for both readers (58.8 % vs. 72.9 %, P = 0.046; 57.6 % vs. 85.9 %, P = 0.001) and did not significantly increase specificity (P = 0.085 and 0.396). Two readers noted that 28.6 % and 23.3 % of 262 bowel segments had greater diffusion restriction extent on DWI-MRE with Buscopan compared with DWI-MRE without Buscopan (P < 0.001) and 68.7 % and 74 %, respectively, had similar extent between them.

CONCLUSION

Omitting Buscopan caused a greater loss in sensitivity of DWI-MRE than false-positive reduction for diagnosing bowel inflammation in CD.

KEY POINTS

• Omitting Buscopan significantly decreases DWI-MRE sensitivity for diagnosing bowel inflammation in CD. • Increase in the corresponding DWI-MRE specificity by omitting Buscopan is less apparent. • DWI-MRE without Buscopan underestimates the extent of bowel inflammation in CD.

Pharmacologic Agents for Chronic Diarrhea

Chronic diarrhea is usually associated with a number of non-infectious causes. When definitive treatment is unavailable, symptomatic drug therapy is indicated. Pharmacologic agents for chronic diarrhea include loperamide, 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonists, diosmectite, cholestyramine, probiotics, antispasmodics, rifaximin, and anti-inflammatory agents. Loperamide, a synthetic opiate agonist, decreases peristaltic activity and inhibits secretion, resulting in the reduction of fluid and electrolyte loss and an increase in stool consistency. Cholestyramine is a bile acid sequestrant that is generally considered as the first-line treatment for bile acid diarrhea. 5-HT3 receptor antagonists have significant benefits in patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) with diarrhea. Ramosetron improves stool consistency as well as global IBS symptoms. Probiotics may have a role in the prevention of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. However, data on the role of probiotics in the treatment of chronic diarrhea are lacking. Diosmectite, an absorbent, can be used for the treatment of chronic functional diarrhea, radiation-induced diarrhea, and chemotherapy-induced diarrhea. Antispasmodics including alverine citrate, mebeverine, otilonium bromide, and pinaverium bromide are used for relieving diarrheal symptoms and abdominal pain. Rifaximin can be effective for chronic diarrhea associated with IBS and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth. Budesonide is effective in both lymphocytic colitis and collagenous colitis. The efficacy of mesalazine in microscopic colitis is weak or remains uncertain. Considering their mechanisms of action, these agents should be prescribed properly.

CNS medications as predictors of precipitous cognitive decline in the cognitively disabled aged: a longitudinal population-based study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Psychotropics and antiepileptics (AE) are medications commonly used among the aged with cognitive decline or dementia, although they may precipitate further cognitive decline. Our aim was to analyze the relationships between the use of (i) psychotropics (i.e. benzodiazepines or related drugs, BZD, antipsychotics, AP, or antidepressants, AD), opioids (Op), anticholinergics (ACh) or AEs or the concomitant use of two of these drugs, and (ii) the risk of precipitous cognitive decline in an older (≥65 years) cognitively disabled population.

METHODS

A longitudinal population-based study of general aged community-dwelling patients was executed in two phases (1990-1991 and 1998-1999) in Lieto, Finland. Fifty-two individuals cognitively disabled (MMSE score 0-23) at the 1990-1991 baseline form this study's sample. Cognitive abilities were assessed in each phase with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and medication utilization data were collected in both phases. The mean follow-up time was 7.6 years. Multivariate models were used to analyze the change in MMSE total score between medication users and non-users.

RESULTS

BZD or any psychotropic use was associated with greater cognitive decline in elders aged ≥75 years compared to non-users (change in MMSE sum score: -8.6 ± 7.0 vs. -3.3 ± 5.6 and -5.9 ± 7.0 vs. -2.7 ± 6.4, respectively). A greater decline was also associated specifically with the concomitant use of BZD and AP (-16 vs. -1.4 ± 7.8); as were BZD and any drug with CNS effects (-9.6 ± 9.9 vs. -1.3 ± 7.2) compared to non-users. The concomitant use of BZD and AD (-10.7 ± 4.7 vs. -3.2 ± 5.6) or ACh (-15.0 ± 8.5 vs. -3.3 ± 5.6) or any drug with CNS effects (-13.3 ± 6.5 vs. -3.3 ± 5.6) was associated with cognitive decline in patients ≥75 years compared to non-users of any drug with CNS effects.

CONCLUSION

The use of a BZD or any psychotropic medication may be an independent risk factor for cognitive decline in the cognitively disabled aged, and patients co-prescribed psychotropic medications had greater cognitive decline. Studies with larger sample sizes and studies on possible pathophysiologic mechanisms are needed.