Long-term effects on swallowing and laryngeal function after treatment for severe COVID-19 disease in intensive care

PURPOSE

This study aimed to assess swallowing and laryngeal function at long-term follow-up in patients treated for severe COVID-19 in the ICU.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with severe COVID-19 were prospectively examined with fiberendoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) about 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge. Comparison with initial FEES examinations during the time in hospital was performed in 17 patients. Analysis of swallowing function and laryngeal features was performed from video recordings. Twenty-five participants responded to Eating Assessment Tool, Voice Handicap Index, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale at follow-up.

RESULTS

Penetration to the laryngeal vestibule (PAS ≥ 3) was seen in 22% and silent aspiration (PAS = 8) in 11% of patients on at least one swallow at follow-up. Fourteen percent had obvious residue in the vallecula and/or pyriform sinuses after swallowing thick liquid or biscuits. Self-reported eating and swallowing difficulties were found in 40% of patients. Abnormal findings in the larynx were present in 53% at follow-up. Thirty-three percent had reduced or impaired vocal fold movement, of whom 22% had bilateral impaired abduction of the vocal folds. Possible anxiety and depression were found in 36% and 24% of responders, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although a majority of patients appear to regain normal swallowing function by 1 year after treatment for severe COVID-19, our results indicate that dysphagia, abnormal laryngeal function, and anxiety/depression may remain in a substantial proportion of patients. This suggests that swallowing and laryngeal function, and emotional symptoms, should be followed up systematically over time in this patient group.

An assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity: identifying oncologic benefit and an evidence-practice gap in routine clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Patient reported outcome measurements (PROMs) are emerging as an important component of patient management in the cancer setting, providing broad perspectives on patients' quality of life and experience. The use of PROMs is, however, generally limited to the context of randomised control trials, as healthcare services are challenged to sustain high quality of care whilst facing increasing demand and financial shortfalls. We performed a systematic review of the literature to identify any oncological benefit of using PROMs and investigate the wider impact on patient experience, in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity specifically.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (Pubmed) and Ovid Gateway (Embase and Ovid) until April 2020. Studies investigating the oncological outcomes of PROMs were deemed suitable for inclusion.

RESULTS

A total of 21 studies were included from 2167 screened articles. Various domains of quality of life (QoL) were identified as potential prognosticators for oncologic outcomes in cancers of the pelvic abdominal cavity, independent of other clinicopathological features of disease: 3 studies identified global QoL as a prognostic factor, 6 studies identified physical and role functioning, and 2 studies highlighted fatigue. In addition to improved outcomes, a number of included studies also reported that the use of PROMs enhanced both patient-clinician communication and patient satisfaction with care in the clinical setting.

CONCLUSIONS

This review highlights the necessity of routine collection of PROMs within the pelvic abdominal cancer setting to improve patient quality of life and outcomes.

CR-lipped bearing is an adequate functional solution to patients with perioperative excessive laxity in cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The cruciate retaining lipped (CR-lipped) bearing is designed to provide more anterior-posterior (AP) stability and could be employed to resolve excessive intraoperative laxity during the cruciate retaining TKA (CR-TKA). The aim of the study was to determine whether the CR-lipped bearing in CR-TKAs with a perioperative excessive laxity allows equivalent functional results as compared to the standard CR articulation.

METHODS

A cohort of 111 TKAs with CR-lipped bearings was matched to a cohort of conventional CR bearings regarding age and sex. The CR-lipped bearing was used in patients with excessive knee AP laxity and the regular CR bearing was used in patients without excessive AP laxity during TKA. Various PROMs (WOMAC, KSS, SF-36) were assessed preoperatively and at 5-years postoperative in combination with revision rate and Range of Motion (ROM).

RESULTS

PROMs did not differ significantly between both groups 5-years postoperatively. Mean ROM (flexion) 5-years postoperatively was not significantly different. The implant survivorship was 100% for both cohorts with revision for any reason as end point.

CONCLUSION

Based on these results, the CR-lipped bearing is a safe and effective solution for mild interoperatively assessed PCL laxity during CR-TKA without loss of function or decreased survivorship at 5 years. Peroperative conversion to a PS-TKA in order to obtain satisfactory functional scores might therefore not be necessary when mild PCL laxity is observed during surgery. Further research should focus on verifying this approach and longer follow-up is needed to generate data on long term survivorship.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV therapeutic, retrospective, cohort study.

Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of the Italian version of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score

PURPOSE

The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (OSIS) is self-reported outcome measurement developed to evaluate shoulder instability taking into account also adaptive strategies. Valid, reliable, reproducible, and user-friendly translations of outcome measure instruments are needed to allow comparisons of international study results.

METHODS

The Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the OSIS were completed using a "translation-back translation" method and the final version was administered to a sample of 25 consecutive Italian-speaking patients. The psychometric properties of this adaptation were evaluated in terms of feasibility, reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

No major differences occurred between the OSIS translations into Italian and back into English, and no content- or linguistic-related difficulties were reported. The Cronbach's alpha for the total OSIS was 0.897. Intraclass correlation coefficient value for inter-rater reliability was 0.805, while for intra-rater reliability was 0.586. Spearman rank correlation coefficient between the OSIS and the Rowe score was 0.548 (p = 0.005) and between OSIS-I and SF-12 was 0.488 (p = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian version of the OSIS is a reliable, valid, and reproducible outcome measure for clinical evaluation of patients affected by shoulder instability, which remains simple and user-friendly as the original version.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prospective cohort study, Level II.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

The availability of a validated translation of the OSIS will help surgeon to share their data on shoulder instability diagnostic and treatment in a more reproducible and comparable fashion.