1
|
Gojsevic M, Kennedy S, Rajeswaran T, Herst P, Safavi AH, Corbin K, Hill R, Tran W, Carothers K, Gallant F, Trombetta M, Arscott WT, Shariati S, Lam J, Akkila S, Behroozian T, Zhang E, Karam I, Chow E. Patient-reported experience with the use of Mepitel Film for prevention of acute radiation dermatitis in breast cancer. Support Care Cancer 2024; 32:89. [PMID: 38190084 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-023-08302-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Mepitel Film (MF) has been demonstrated to reduce the severity of radiation dermatitis (RD) in patients receiving breast cancer radiotherapy (RT). The objective of this study was to characterize patient-reported experience with MF use, including its impact on daily activities and wellbeing. MATERIALS AND METHODS This single-institution study analyzed anonymized responses to a questionnaire completed by patients who used MF for the prevention of RD during breast cancer RT. RESULTS Of the 254 patients contacted, 192 patients completed the survey. Most patients disagreed or strongly disagreed that MF limited their ability to perform their daily activities, including household chores (88%, n = 169/191), their ability to work (83%, n = 157/189), or their ability to sleep (85%, n = 163/191). Furthermore, patients agreed or strongly agreed MF was comfortable on their skin (67%, n = 126/189) and protected their skin from rubbing against clothing (86%, n = 161/188). Some patients agreed or strongly agreed that MF affected their ability to shower (31%, n = 50/162), wear bras (28%, n = 51/185), and impacted their level of pruritus (35%, n = 67/189). However, most patients agreed or strongly agreed that their overall experience with MF was positive (92%, n = 173/189) and would recommend MF to a friend undergoing breast cancer RT (88%, n = 166/188). CONCLUSION MF use is associated with positive patient-reported experience during breast RT with minimal impact on daily activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milena Gojsevic
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Samantha Kennedy
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Thenugaa Rajeswaran
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Patries Herst
- Department of Radiation Therapy, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Amir H Safavi
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kimberly Corbin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Rosemary Hill
- Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - William Tran
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Katherine Carothers
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - François Gallant
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mark Trombetta
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny General Hospital, Drexel University College of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - William T Arscott
- Division of Radiation Oncology, West Cancer Center, Compass Oncology, Tigard, OR, USA
| | - Saba Shariati
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jacqueline Lam
- Health Sciences North, Sudbury, ON, Canada
- Sault Area Hospital, Sault Ste. Marie, ON, Canada
| | - Shereen Akkila
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tara Behroozian
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Elwyn Zhang
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Irene Karam
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Edward Chow
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vinagreiro M, Valverde JN, Alves D, Costa M, Gouveia P, Guerreiro E. Walking Clinic in ambulatory surgery--A patient based concept: A Portuguese pioneer project. Int J Surg 2015; 18:174-7. [PMID: 25907327 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2015] [Revised: 03/06/2015] [Accepted: 04/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Walking Clinic is an innovative, efficient and easily reproducible concept adapted to ambulatory surgery. It consists of a preoperative single day work-up, with a surgeon, an anesthetist and a nurse. The aim of this study was to evaluate patient satisfaction and its determinants. METHODS A survey was applied to 171 patients (101 of the Walking Clinic group and 70 not engaged in this new concept). Patient satisfaction was assessed evaluating five major questionnaire items: secretariat (quality of the information and support given), physical space (overall comfort and cleanliness), nurses and medical staff (willingness and expertise), and patients (waiting time until pre-operative consults and exams, waiting time until being scheduled for surgery, surgery day waiting time and postoperative pain control). Furthermore, overall assessment of the received treatment, and probability of patient recommending or returning to our ambulatory unit were also analyzed. RESULTS Walking Clinic group had overall better results in the five major questionnaire items assessed, with statistical significance, except for the physical space. It also showed better results regarding the sub-items postoperative pain control, waiting time until being scheduled for surgery and surgery day waiting time. DISCUSSION The results confirm better patient satisfaction with this new concept. CONCLUSION The Walking Clinic concept complements all the tenets of ambulatory surgery, in a more efficient manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Vinagreiro
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Rua Dr. Eduardo Torres, Senhora da Hora, 4464-513 Porto, Portugal.
| | - J N Valverde
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Rua Dr. Eduardo Torres, Senhora da Hora, 4464-513 Porto, Portugal
| | - D Alves
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Rua Dr. Eduardo Torres, Senhora da Hora, 4464-513 Porto, Portugal
| | - M Costa
- School of Technology and Management of Águeda, University of Aveiro, Apartado 473, 3754-909 Águeda, Portugal
| | - P Gouveia
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Rua Dr. Eduardo Torres, Senhora da Hora, 4464-513 Porto, Portugal
| | - E Guerreiro
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Pedro Hispano, Rua Dr. Eduardo Torres, Senhora da Hora, 4464-513 Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|