Effect of an 8-Week Tailored Physiotherapy Program on Sexual Health in Women with Scleroderma and Myositis: A Controlled Pilot Study

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) and idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are very rare rheumatic diseases burdened by a high prevalence of sexual dysfunctions. However, no specific treatment has been proposed to date. To our knowledge, this is the first (pilot) study aiming to investigate the effect of an 8-week tailored physiotherapy program on the sexual health of women with SSc and IIM.

METHODS

In total, 12 women with SSc and 4 women with IIM were enrolled in the study. Based on the patients' capability to participate in the program, they were divided into an intervention group (IG) (mean ± SD age 46.8 ± 8.6 years) and a control group (CG) (mean ± SD age 46.3 ± 8.5 years). IG underwent the 8-week program (1 h of supervised physiotherapy twice weekly), whereas CG received no physiotherapy. At weeks 0 and 8, all patients filled in questionnaires assessing sexual function (Female Sexual Function Index [FSFI], Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women [BISF-W]), sexual quality of life (Sexual Quality of Life-Female [SQoL-F]), functional ability (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), quality of life (Medical Outcomes Short Form-36 [SF-36]), and depression (Beck's Depression Inventory-II [BDI-II]). The changes were analyzed with two-way ANOVA and Friedmann's test.

RESULTS

Compared to the statistically significant deterioration in CG over weeks 0-8, we found statistically significant improvements in the total scores of FSFI and BISF-W, and some of their domains, functional status, and the physical component of quality of life.

CONCLUSION

Our 8-week physiotherapy program not only prevented the natural course of progressive deterioration of functional ability but also led to a significant improvement in sexual function and quality of life in women with SSc and IIM. However, due to the lack of randomization and a relatively small sample size resulting from the strict inclusion criteria, further validation of our results is needed.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN91200867 (prospectively registered).

Does the addition of electrical stimulation or kinesiotherapy improve outcomes of amitriptyline treatment for women with vulvodynia? A randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Women diagnosed with provoked vulvodynia frequently report a great deal of frustration in achieving symptomatic relief. Physical therapy and drug treatment are among the interventions most indicated by guidelines; however, whether those modalities are effective when combined remains unclear. The objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of adding a physical therapy modality compared with amitriptyline alone for the treatment of vulvodynia.

METHODS

Eighty-six women with vulvodynia were randomized to (G1) 25 mg amitriptyline, once a day (n=27), (G2) amitriptyline + electrical stimulation therapy (n=29) or (G3) amitriptyline + kinesiotherapy (n=30). All treatment modalities were administered for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was the reduction in vestibular pain. Secondary measurements focused on sexual pain, frequency of vaginal intercourse, Friedrich score, and overall sexual function. Data were analyzed using intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

All treatment modalities resulted in a significant decrease in vestibular pain (p<0.001), sexual pain (p<0.05), Friedrich score (p<0.001), and an increase in the frequency of sexual intercourse (p<0.05). G3 was more effective than G1 at reducing sexual pain (G1: 5.3±3.3 vs G3: 3.2±2.7; p=0.01) and at improving sexual function (G1: 18.8±9.8 vs G3: 23.9±7.8; p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Kinesiotherapy and electrotherapy additions to amitriptyline administration as well as amitriptyline alone, were effective at improving vestibular pain in women with vulvodynia. Women receiving physical therapy had the greatest improvement in sexual function and frequency of intercourse at post-treatment and follow-up.

[First data from a digital health app for erectile dysfunction]

PURPOSE

In a systematic data analysis, we evaluated the influence of a digital health app on erection scores as well as life quality and patient activation in a group of patients with erectile dysfunction.

METHODS

In all, 44 participants took part in an evidence-based program for patients with erectile dysfunction. The in app 12-week program included pelvic floor exercises and physiotherapeutic and cardiovascular training. In addition, there where sessions on mindfulness and sexual therapy as well as useful information about erectile dysfunction and its causes, nutrition, and risk factors. The median age was 46 years (19-75 years). All patients answered IIEF‑5, PAM-13 and QoL-Med questionnaires at the beginning and the end of the program. A total of 27 questionnaires could be evaluated at both times.

RESULTS

The average improvement in IIEF‑5 score was 4.5 points (p < 0.0001). 96% of patients showed overall improvement of erection scores. Improvement in life quality was shown in 93% of participants. Moreover, there was a significant increase in patient activation scores.

CONCLUSION

We were able to show that a multimodal digital app for self-management of erectile dysfunction improved not only erection scores but also life quality and patient activation. We concluded that it is possible to reproduce results of analog studies in a digital setting. Digital solutions can help to include patients in their treatment and to put guideline suggestions into practice.

Enabling or Cultivating? The Role of Prostate Cancer Patients' Received Partner Support and Self-Efficacy in the Maintenance of Pelvic Floor Exercise Following Tumor Surgery

BACKGROUND

To manage incontinence following tumor surgery, prostate cancer patients are advised to perform pelvic floor exercise (PFE). Patients' self-efficacy and support from partners were shown to facilitate PFE. Whereas support may enhance self-efficacy (enabling function), self-efficacy may also cultivate support (cultivation function).

PURPOSE

Cross-lagged inter-relationships among self-efficacy, support, and PFE were investigated.

METHOD

Post-surgery patient-reported received support, self-efficacy, PFE, and partner-reported provided support were assessed from 175 couples at four times. Autoregressive models tested interrelations among variables, using either patients' or partners' reports of support.

RESULTS

Models using patients' data revealed positive associations between self-efficacy and changes in received support, which predicted increased PFE. Using partners' accounts of support provided, these associations were partially cross-validated. Furthermore, partner-provided support was related with increases in patients' self-efficacy.

CONCLUSION

Patients' self-efficacy may cultivate partners' support provision for patients' PFE, whereas evidence of an enabling function of support as a predictor of self-efficacy was inconsistent.