[S156] Comparing outcomes of per-oral pyloromyotomy and robotic pyloroplasty for the treatment of gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis is characterized by delayed gastric emptying without a significant obstructive pathology and is estimated to effect more than 5 million adults in the United States. Therapies for this condition are divided into two categories: gastric electrical stimulation or pyloric therapies to facilitate gastric emptying. Pyloric procedures include pyloroplasty, a well-documented procedure, and per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POP), a relatively novel endoscopic procedure that disrupts the pyloric muscles endoscopically. There is a paucity of literature comparing the two procedures. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of these two techniques.

METHODS

Under an IRB protocol, data were collected prospectively from September 2018 through April 2021 at our institution for patients undergoing POP (n = 63 patients) or robotic pyloroplasty (RP) (n = 48). Preoperative and postoperative data including sex, race, age, BMI, and Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) score were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in sex, age, and BMI for both cohorts, but patients with RP were more likely to have private insurance, pre-op reflux, and PPI (p < .05 for all). Patients who underwent POP had significantly shorter operative time compared to RP (median 27 min vs 90, p < 0.001). The average change between preoperative and postoperative GCSI scores was significantly decreased for both interventions (POP mean = 8.2, RP 16.8, p < 0.001 both). However, comparing both data, RP has significantly better improvement in postoperative GCSI score than POP in both univariate (p < 0.001) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.030). This was reflected in the individual symptoms with nausea (p < 0.001), ability to finish meal (p = 0.037), abdomen visibly larger (p = 0.037) and bloating (p = 0.022) all showing improvement in both groups, but with RP having a more significant decrease in the scoring of these symptoms than POP. There was no significant difference in the number of postoperative complications (POP 19% vs RP 13%, p = 0.440).

CONCLUSION

Even though both interventions are significantly associated with improvement of symptoms in patients with gastroparesis, our data demonstrates that robotic pyloroplasty has a superior response in comparison to per-oral endoscopic myotomy for the management of these symptoms. Per-oral pyloromyotomy has a similar complication rate to robotic pyloroplasty with a shorter operative time.

Endoscopic findings do not predict per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) response

INTRODUCTION

Gastroparesis is a life-altering diagnosis caused by the stomach's inability to function in the absence of a mechanical obstruction. The primary causes are idiopathic, diabetic, and postoperative. Our first-line treatment for medical refractory gastroparesis is the endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) procedure. Predicting clinical response cost effectively remains elusive.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a POP procedure at our institution by a single surgical endoscopist from January 1, 2019 to June 30, 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. All endoscopic data were prospectively collected. The patients were followed by a survey including the Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index (GCSI) and other relevant postoperative measures. The primary endpoint was clinical response defined as ≥ 1.0 decrease in the GCSI from preoperative to the time of survey. Secondary outcome was normalization of the gastric emptying study (GES).

RESULTS

Our patient population is 85% female and has an average age of 44.8 years. The diagnosis of gastroparesis is 71% iatrogenic, 19% postoperative, and 10% diabetic. On endoscopy, 30% had bile in the stomach and 65% had any degree of pylorospasm. The primary outcome measure of clinical response was 39% at an average of 697 ± 151 days post-POP, but 66% of patients attested to an improvement in their symptoms. Of 68 postoperative gastric emptying studies 50% normalized at an average of 145 ± 98 days. Following univariate and multivariate analyses of preoperative data and endoscopic findings, there were no significant predictors of clinical response. A preoperative GCSI ≥ 2.6 trends toward significance (OR 6.87, p = 0.058).

CONCLUSION

Endoscopic findings at the time of POP do not correlate with clinical response. The GCSI model currently used to measure clinical response may not accurately capture the full clinical picture. The long-term durability of endoscopic myotomy to treat medical refractory gastroparesis needs to be studied further to improve patient selection.

Gastric per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy for Refractory Gastroparesis: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

The emerging gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) is becoming an alternative treatment method for gastroparesis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and safety of G-POEM for gastroparesis.

METHODS

Relevant publications were identified through searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science before April 1, 2019. Studies presenting the clinical data of G-POEM for the treatment of gastroparesis were included. Data about effectiveness and safety were extracted, pooled, and analyzed. Forest plots were graphed based on random effects models.

RESULTS

A total of 272 patients representing 8 studies were eligible for analysis. The pooled rates of GCSI at preprocedure, 1-3 months, 6 months, and 12 months, were 3.25 (95% CI, 2.75-3.75), 1.80 (95% CI, 1.10-2.49), 1.56 (95% CI, 0.45-2.68), and 1.10 (95% CI, 0.75-1.45), respectively. The pooled results of 4-h GES pre- and post-G-POEM were 41.89% (95% CI, 32.75-51.03%) and 16.48% (95% CI, 9.83-23.14%), respectively. Furthermore, the pooled clinical response rate was 84% (95% CI, 77-89%). The GES improvement rate and GES normal rate were also analyzed, and the results were 84% (95% CI, 77-90%) and 53% (95% CI, 39-66%), respectively. Finally, the pooled adverse events rate was 12% (95% CI, 6-19%).

CONCLUSIONS

G-POEM was shown to be feasible and safe for the treatment of gastroparesis with various etiologies, which could be a potential first-line therapy for certain patients. Future studies are needed to investigate the appropriate patients for G-POEM to explore the "most beneficial" subgroup of patients.

Recent advances in third space or intramural endoscopy

Third space endoscopy or intramural endoscopy is based on the principle that the deeper layers of the gastrointestinal tract can be accessed by tunneling in the submucosal space and maintaining the integrity of the overlying mucosa. The era of third space endoscopy started with peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for treatment of achalasia and has expanded to treat various other gastrointestinal disorders. The technique is also currently used for treatment of refractory gastroparesis, Zenker’s diverticulum (ZD), resection of subepithelial tumors and early cancers of the gastrointestinal tract and Hirschsprung’s disease (HD). These procedures are rapidly emerging as minimally invasive alternatives to conventional surgery. They are safe and effective with excellent outcomes. This review focuses on the evolution and current applications of third space endoscopy in various gastrointestinal disorders. Key points: (1) Third space or intramural endoscopy initially started with the POEM procedure for treatment of achalasia; (2) Advancements in procedural techniques have expanded its application to treat other gastrointestinal disorders such as refractory gastroparesis, ZD, HD, resection of subepithelial tumors and early gastrointestinal cancers; (3) These procedures are highly effective with excellent outcomes and low complication rates; and (4) Third space endoscopic procedures are rapidly emerging as minimally invasive alternatives to conventional surgery.

Medical and surgical management of gastroparesis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Gastroparesis (GPS) is a rare disease with multiple etiologies that results in delayed gastric emptying. Diagnosis of GPS can be challenging due to its rather complex clinical presentation. Pharmacologic refractory cases require surgical interventions, all of which have yet to be standardized and characterized.

OBJECTIVES

We present a review of the literature and provide an update of current therapies for patients with GPS.

SETTING

Department of General Surgery, Academic Hospital, United States.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, Google Scholar, and Embase of English-written articles published in the last 38 years, with an advance title search of "gastroparesis management." Other keywords included: "surgical management" and "refractory gastroparesis." Further references were obtained through cross-reference.

RESULTS

A total of 12,250 articles were selected after eliminating duplicates. Following thorough screening of selection criteria, 68 full-text articles were included for review.

CONCLUSION

GPS is a challenging disease to manage. Nutritional support must remain the primary approach, followed by either medical or surgical treatment modalities if necessary. In patients with refractory gastroparesis, adjunctive therapies have been proposed as promising long-term options.

Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP) for Medically Refractory Post-Surgical Gastroparesis

BACKGROUND

Post-surgical gastroparesis (psGP) is putatively related to vagal denervation from either therapeutic transection or inadvertent injury. Here, we present a series of patients undergoing endoscopic per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) as a treatment for medically refractory psGP.

METHODS

Patients identified from a prospectively maintained database of patients undergoing POP procedures at our institution from January 2016 to January 2018 were included. Surgical history, symptom scores, and gastric emptying studies before and 3 months after POP were additionally recorded.

RESULTS

During the study period, 177 POP procedures were performed, of which 38 (21.5%) were for psGP. The study cohort was 84.2% female with a mean body mass index of 27.6 kg/m² and mean age of 55.2 years. Common comorbidities included hypertension (34.2%), depression (31.6%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (28.9%). Hiatal/paraesophageal hernia repair (39.5%) or fundoplication (36.8%) preceded psGP diagnosis most often. The mean operative time was 30 ± 20 min. There were no intraoperative complications. Mean postoperative length of stay was 1.2 days. There were two readmissions within 30 days, one for melena and one for dehydration. The mean improvement in total Gastroparesis Symptom Index Score was 1.29 (p = 0.0002). The mean 4-h gastric retention improved from a pre-POP mean of 46.4 to 17.9% post-POP. Normal gastric emptying was noted in 50% of subjects with available follow-up imaging.

CONCLUSION

POP is a safe and effective endoscopic therapy for patients with psGP. POP should be considered a reasonable first-line option for patients with medically refractory psGP and may allow stomach preservation.

Outcomes and Future Directions of Per-Oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy: A View from France

Gastroparesis is a challenging functional gastroenterological disorder, the complex pathophysiology of which hampers development of therapeutic modalities. Per-oral pyloromyotomy (POP) is a promising endoscopic therapy with a short-term clinical success rate of greater than 80%. Interest in POP is increasing, particularly in France, a country in which there is considerable expertise in submucosal endoscopy and functional disorders. Long-term follow-up and pyloric function evaluation are needed to assess the efficacy of POP in gastroparetic patients.

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy for refractory gastroparesis: A detailed description of the procedure, our experience, and review of the literature. Surg Endosc. 2018;32:3421-3431. [PMID: 29435752 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-018-6112-5]

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Gastric per-oral endoscopic myotomy (G-POEM) was introduced four years ago as an investigational procedure for refractory gastroparesis. The safety and efficacy were currently evaluated. With our recent studies on G-POEM, we share our experience and knowledge through the discussion of a detailed description of the procedure and review of the literature. To our knowledge, this is the first systemic review on this new therapeutic endoscopic procedure.

METHODS

The indications and contraindications, various aspects of the procedure, and efficacy assessment are discussed based on our experience and current available data.

RESULTS

Preoperative preparation, detailed description of the procedure, post-procedural care, and results in the literature are presented. The procedure is safe and effective. 70-80% of patients have significant improvement in overall symptoms and quality of life in short-term (6 months) follow-up, as assessed by Gastric Cardinal Symptom Index and Short Form 36.

CONCLUSIONS

G-POEM is a feasible and effective procedure for refractory gastroparesis based on early and limited data. Well-designed prospective studies are expected to advance and evaluate this new procedure in the future.

How I Do It: Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP)

INTRODUCTION

Several surgical treatments exist for treatment of gastroparesis, including gastric electrical stimulation, pyloroplasty, and gastrectomy. Division of the pylorus by means of endoscopy, Per-Oral Pyloromyotomy (POP), is a newer, endoluminal therapy that may offer a less invasive, interventional treatment option.

METHODS

We describe and present a video of our step by step technique for POP using a lesser curvature approach. The following are technical steps to complete the POP procedure from the lesser curve approach.

CONCLUSION

In our experience, these methods provide promising initial results with low operative risks, although long-term outcomes remain to be determined.