Validation of an automated dispensing system for subsequent dose dispensing of different radionuclides

BACKGROUND

Automated dispensing systems (ADSs) for radiopharmaceuticals have been developed to reduce the radiation exposure of personnel, to improve the accuracy of the dispensed dose and to limit the microbiological contamination. However, before implementing such systems, validation according to various applicable guidelines is necessary to ensure safety and quality. Here we present the selection, validation and implementation of the PT459R2 from manufacturer Lynax s.r.o. as a guidance protocol for validation according to GMP and GRPP guidelines. Validation included linearity accuracy and precision of the internal scintillation detector for different isotopes and microbiological validation for aseptic procedures.

RESULTS

The ADS can dispense accurate doses in the following linear range: 1000-10,000 MBq for lutetium-177, 20-74 MBq for zirconium-89, 100-1000 MBq for gallium-68 and 100-2000 MBq for fluorine-18. The maximum bias is 2.35% and the maximum coefficient of variation is 3.03% which meets the acceptance criteria of < 5%. Furthermore, the ADS does not affects the GMP class A environment in a laminar airflow cabinet and can dispense aseptically. In addition, radiation exposure is acceptable and data integrity is preserved.

CONCLUSION

The PT459R2 ADS met all the requirements from our performance qualification and is therefore suitable for daily routine use in our center. Our approach can be used as a guidance for PQ of an ADS in a Radiopharmacy according to GMP and GRPP guidelines.

Establishment of instrument operation qualification and routine performance qualification procedures for handheld near-infrared spectrometers used at different locations within a laboratory network

Quality assurance of finished pharmaceuticals is a necessity in ensuring the safety of consumers. There is a need for low-cost and portable rapid screening methods of pharmaceuticals in resource limited areas. Recent advances in technology have made handheld and low-cost diffuse reflectance spectrometers available to the public. While these handheld spectrometers offer advantages over benchtop spectrometers, the accuracy and repeatability must be assessed before these instruments can be used for quality assurance screening. Here, five handheld spectrometers of the same model were purchased, where an in-house installation qualification and operational qualification (IQOQ) was subsequently established for the instruments. Wavelength and photometric accuracy (and repeatability), spectroscopic noise, stray light, and bandpass were assessed between instruments. Results were found to be consistent between the spectrometers, passing IQOQ procedures, and were determined to be ready for field use. Once the handheld spectrometer's performance was verified, a practical and low-cost daily performance verification was established using common high density polyethylene vial caps on location in South Africa, Thailand, and the United States. A Mahalanobis distance-based classifier found the five spectrometers to be in agreement.

Method Verification Requirements for an Advanced Imaging System for Microbial Plate Count Enumeration

The Growth Direct™ System that automates the incubation and reading of membrane filtration microbial counts on soybean-casein digest, Sabouraud dextrose, and R2A agar differs only from the traditional method in that micro-colonies on the membrane are counted using an advanced imaging system up to 50% earlier in the incubation. Based on the recommendations in USP <1223> Validation of New Microbiological Testing Methods, the system may be implemented in a microbiology laboratory after simple method verification and not a full method validation.LAY ABSTRACT: The Growth Direct™ System that automates the incubation and reading of microbial counts on membranes on solid agar differs only from the traditional method in that micro-colonies on the membrane are counted using an advanced imaging system up to 50% earlier in the incubation time. Based on the recommendations in USP <1223> Validation of New Microbiological Testing Methods, the system may be implemented in a microbiology laboratory after simple method verification and not a full method validation.