Promotion of a venous thromboembolism prevention protocol at a perioperative management center

OBJECTIVES

Perioperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a potentially fatal complication, making preoperative VTE diagnosis and secondary thromboprophylaxis important. This study was performed to investigate the impact of promotion of a preoperative VTE protocol at a perioperative management center (PMC) on detecting the preoperative VTE rate and subsequent treatment.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved patients aged ≥20 years who underwent elective anesthesia. The patients were divided into two groups: the pre-PMC group (January to October 2014, before the opening of the PMC) and the post-PMC group (January to December 2019, after the opening of the PMC). The rates of preoperative lower-limb compression ultrasonography (CUS), VTE detection, anticoagulation therapy, and new postoperative pulmonary embolism (PE) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The pre-PMC and post-PMC groups comprised 3737 and 5388 patients, respectively. The preoperative CUS and VTE detection rates were significantly higher in the post-PMC than pre-PMC group (7.2% and 1.43% vs. 25.6% and 3.93%, respectively; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in the rate of anticoagulation therapy in patients with preoperative VTE (88.9% vs. 84.7%, P=0.43). Heparin and direct oral anticoagulants were primarily used in the pre-PMC and post-PMC groups, respectively. The efficacy and safety were comparable between the two groups. No new postoperative PE was detected in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Promotion of the preoperative VTE protocol led by the PMC increased the rates of preoperative CUS and preoperative VTE detection. This may aid in secondary thromboprophylaxis in the preoperative period and prevention of postoperative PE.

Effect of multidisciplinary interventions in perioperative management center on duration of preoperative fasting: A single-center before-and-after study

OBJECTIVES

Our aims were to clarify the actual situation regarding preoperative fasting and determine whether multidisciplinary interventions in a perioperative management center shorten the duration of preoperative fasting.

METHODS

The cohort of this before-and-after study comprised patients undergoing elective surgery aged 18 years or older who underwent general anesthesia at one of three stages: after starting a short preoperative fasting protocol (Group A), after the anesthesiologist started explaining the protocol (Group B), and after the start of the perioperative management center (Group C). Instructions on drinking clear fluids were given up to 2 h and 4 h before the start of elective surgery to the first patient on the list (on-time) and to the second and subsequent patients (on-call), respectively. Data were collected retrospectively in Groups A and B and prospectively in Group C.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 89 patients in Group A (50 on-time, 39 on-call), 108 in Group B (65 on-time, 43 on-call), and 284 in Group C (182 on-time, 102 on-call). The difference between the instructed and last drinking time was significantly shorter in Group C than Group A (30 [10, 140] vs. 30 [10, 60] vs. 20 [0, 50] min, p=0.003). The duration of fasting was significantly shorter in Group C than Group B (243 [150, 395] vs. 213 [151, 323] vs. 180 [146, 280] min, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Multidisciplinary interventions at the perioperative management center tended to reduce the duration of fasting, suggesting that this approach may contribute to improved compliance.