Diagnostic and prognostic performance of plasma neurofilament light chain in multiple system atrophy: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

BACKGROUND

The longitudinal dynamics of neurofilament light chain (NfL) in multiple system atrophy (MSA) were incompletely illuminated. This study aimed to explore whether the plasma NfL (pNfL) could serve as a potential biomarker of clinical diagnosis and disease progression for MSA.

METHODS

We quantified pNfL concentrations in both a large cross-sectional cohort with 214 MSA individuals, 65 PD individuals, and 211 healthy controls (HC), and a longitudinal cohort of 84 MSA patients. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to balance the age between the three groups. The pNfL levels between groups were compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Linear mixed models were performed to explore the disease progression-associated factors in longitudinal MSA cohort. Random forest model as a complement to linear models was employed to quantify the importance of predictors.

RESULTS

Before and after matching the age by PSM, the pNfL levels could reliably differentiate MSA from HC and PD groups, but only had mild potential to distinguish PD from HC. By combining linear and nonlinear models, we demonstrated that pNfL levels at baseline, rather than the change rate of pNfL, displayed potential prognostic value for progression of MSA. The combination of baseline pNfL levels and other modifiers, such as subtypes, Hoehn-Yahr stage at baseline, was first shown to improve the diagnosis accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study contributed to a better understanding of longitudinal dynamics of pNfL in MSA, and validated the values of pNfL as a non-invasive sensitive biomarker for the diagnosis and progression. The combination of pNfL and other factors is recommended for better monitoring and prediction of MSA progression.

Plasma neurofilament light chain as a biomarker of Alzheimer's disease in Subjective Cognitive Decline and Mild Cognitive Impairment

INTRODUCTION

Neurofilament light chain (NfL) is becoming increasingly notable in neurological diseases including AD, and it has been suggested as a new peripherical biomarker of neurodegeneration. We aimed to compare plasma NfL levels among Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD), Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI), and AD patients and to evaluate relationships between NfL and CSF biomarkers and neuropsychological scores.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We enrolled 110 patients (34 SCD, 53 MCI, and 23 AD), who underwent clinical and neuropsychological evaluation, APOE genotyping, and plasma NfL analysis. Ninety-one patients underwent at least one amyloid burden biomarker (CSF and/or amyloid PET); 86 patients also underwent CSF phosphorylated-tau (p-tau) and total-tau (t-tau) measurement. Patients were classified as A + if they presented at least one positive amyloid biomarker or A- if not.

RESULTS

NfL levels were significantly increased in AD and MCI compared to SCD patients. These differences depend on A status, e.g., SCD A + had lower NfLs than MCI A + but comparable with MCI A-. Similarly, MCI A + had higher NfL levels than MCI A-, but comparable with AD. NfL levels correlated with p-tau in SCD, with all CSF biomarkers in MCI patients. No correlations were found in AD subgroup. In SCD, NfL levels were negatively correlated with memory test scores.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma NfL levels might be a promising biomarker for neurodegeneration to discriminate cognitive decline due to AD from other conditions causing cognitive impairment in prodromal stages. Considering correlations with CSF p-tau and memory tests in SCD, NfL might be a useful peripheral biomarker also in preclinical phases of AD.