Risk of post-extraction bleeding with direct oral anticoagulant compared with warfarin: Retrospective cohort study using large scale claims data in Japan

INTRODUCTION

Comparative safety of direct oral anticoagulants vs. warfarin in patients undergoing tooth extraction remains unclear. We compared the incidence of post-extraction bleeding between patients taking warfarin and those taking direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) using administrative claims data.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified outpatients on anticoagulant therapy who underwent permanent tooth extraction between 2015 and 2020 and categorized them into the warfarin and DOAC groups based on medication prescribed within six months prior to tooth extraction. We used the overlap propensity score weighting method to balance the baseline characteristics between the groups and compared the incidence of post-extraction bleeding within seven days after tooth extraction.

RESULTS

Among 5253 eligible patients, those in the DOAC group (n = 3696) were older and less frequently prescribed antiplatelets than those in the warfarin group (n = 1557). The distribution of tooth extraction type and number of teeth extracted in a single procedure did not differ between the groups. The unadjusted incidences of post-extraction bleeding in the warfarin and DOAC groups were 35 (2.2 %) and 71 (1.9 %), respectively. Moreover, the overlap weighting analysis showed that the adjusted odds ratio of post-extraction bleeding in the DOAC group in comparison with that in the warfarin group was 0.84 (95 % confidence interval, 0.54-1.31).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of post-extraction bleeding in patients taking DOACs was comparable to that in patients taking warfarin. The findings suggest that dentists and physicians should exercise the same degree of caution when extracting teeth in patients on DOACs and those on warfarin in terms of post-extraction bleeding.

Risk factors associated with post-extraction bleeding in patients on warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulants: a retrospective cohort study

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the risk factors associated with post-extraction persistent bleeding in patients on warfarin or direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and the ability of risk scores to predict post-extraction bleeding.

METHODS

Three hundred ninety-one patients taking warfarin or DOACs underwent tooth extractions. Various risk factors for post-extraction bleeding, including number of tooth extraction, with antiplatelet therapy, and risk scores, were investigated by univariate and multivariate analyses. A post-extraction bleeding was classified into grades 1-3.

RESULTS

The incidence of post-extraction bleeding was 26.8% (77 out of 287 patients; grade 1: 63, grade 2:14) in patients taking warfarin, and 26.0% (27 out of 104 patients; grade 1: 20, grade 2:7) in patients taking warfarin DOACs. Multivariate analyses showed that multiple teeth extractions and HAS-BLED scores (above 3 points) in patients taking warfarin, and only multiple teeth extractions in patients taking DOAC, were significantly associated with post-extraction bleeding, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Most of the post-extraction bleedings were grade 1, which can be stopped by eligibly pressing gauze by surgeons. If patients taking anticoagulants are scheduled to undergo multiple teeth extractions or their HAS-BLED score are above 3 points (if warfarin), we recommend informing patients risk of post-extraction bleeding before operation, taking carefully hemostasis, and instructing patients to bite down accurately on the gauze for longer than usual.

Risk factors for post-extraction bleeding in patients with haemophilia: a retrospective cohort study

Many guidelines and studies describe haemostatic management protocols for patients with haemophilia, but few have evaluated the risk factors for post-extraction bleeding. This retrospective cohort study was performed to investigate these risks among this group of patients. We used medical records to identify patients with haemophilia who underwent tooth extraction(s) between April 2006 and April 2019 in the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery at Nara Medical University Hospital, Nara, Japan, and conducted logistic regression analyses to identify risk or protective factors for post-extraction bleeding in procedures involving factor replacement therapy. Post-extraction bleeding was defined as bleeding that could not be stopped by biting down on gauze, and that required medical treatment between 30min and 14 days after the extraction. A total of 151 extractions (84 interventions) in 55 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (130 extractions (72 interventions) in 48 patients with haemophilia A, and 21 extractions (12 interventions) in seven patients with haemophilia B). Post-extraction bleeding was observed in nine patients (16.3%), 10 interventions (11.9%), and 12 extractions (7.9%). On average, it occurred six days after the intervention, and on the fifth postoperative day after extractions. Use of mouth splints significantly reduced the risk (odds ratio: 0.13; p=0.01) in patients on factor replacement therapy. We will conduct a prospective study to investigate the optimal type of splint and optimal splint-wearing period.

Risks of postextraction bleeding after receiving direct oral anticoagulants or warfarin: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

The effect of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) on the risk of bleeding after tooth extraction remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of postextraction bleeding among patients who received DOAC and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), such as warfarin.

DESIGN

This study was a retrospective cohort analysis. Incidence rates and propensity score-matched regression models were used to compare the risks of bleeding after tooth extractions involving DOACs and VKAs.

SETTING

The study took place in a single university hospital in Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Between April 2013 and April 2015, 543 patients underwent a total of 1196 simple tooth extractions.

PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE

The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of postextraction bleeding, which was defined as bleeding that could not be stopped by biting down on gauze and required medical treatment between 30 min and 7 days after the extraction.

RESULTS

A total of 1196 tooth extractions (634 procedures) in 541 patients fulfilled the study criteria, with 72 extractions (41 procedures) involving DOACs, 100 extractions (50 procedures) involving VKAs and 1024 extractions (543 procedures) involving no anticoagulants. The incidences of postextraction bleeding per tooth for the DOAC, VKA and no anticoagulant extractions were 10.4%, 12.0% and 0.9%, respectively. The incidences of postextraction bleeding per procedure for DOACs, VKAs and no anticoagulants were 9.7%, 10.0% and 1.1%, respectively. In comparison to the VKA extractions, the DOAC extractions did not significantly increase the risk of postextraction bleeding (OR 0.69, 95% CIs 0.24 to 1.97; p=0.49).

CONCLUSIONS

The risk of postextraction bleeding was similar for DOAC and VKA extractions.