Blood Collection Processing and Handling for Plasma and Serum Proteomics

The plasma and serum proteome has enormous potential as a tool for understanding the health of a number of physiological systems. Despite this potential, the use of plasma and serum proteomics clinically and for research is limited, and there are no strict guidelines on how samples should be collected and prepared for proteomic analysis. Given the sensitivity of proteomic analysis, there are a number of pre-analytical variables that should be considered and determined prior to undertaking proteomics-based methodologies.In this chapter, we provide an example of a blood processing protocol and highlight major considerations for pre-analytical variables involving the collection, processing, and handling of blood samples for plasma and serum proteomics. We provide comprehensive notes on aspects of the protocol that must be considered before commencing sample collections for a proteomic study as well as a thorough checklist to be used when designing new proteomic studies.

Post-analytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing: An Update

There are typically three phases identified as contributing to the total testing process. The preanalytical phase starts with the clinician and the patient, when laboratory testing is being considered. This phase also includes decisions about which tests to order (or not), patient identification, blood collection, blood transport, sample processing, and storage to name a few. There are many potential failures that may occur in this preanalytical phase, and these are the topic of another chapter in this book. The second phase, the analytical phase, represents the performance of the test, which is essentially covered in various protocols in this book and the previous edition. The third is the post-analytical phase, which is what occurs after sample testing, and is the topic of the current chapter. Post-analytical issues are generally related to reporting and interpretation of test results. This chapter provides a brief description of these events, as well as guidance for preventing or minimizing post-analytical issues. In particular, there are several strategies for improved post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays, with this providing the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in patient diagnosis or management.

Auto-validation of Routine Coagulation/Hemostasis Assays with Reflex Testing of Abnormal Test Results

Hemostasis laboratories play a crucial role in the diagnosis and treatment of individuals with bleeding or thrombotic disorders. Routine coagulation assays, including the prothrombin time (PT)/international normalized ratio (INR), and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), are used for various purposes. These include as a screen of hemostasis function/dysfunction (e.g., possible factor deficiency) and for monitoring of anticoagulant therapy, such as vitamin K antagonists (PT/INR) and unfractionated heparin (APTT). Clinical laboratories are also under increasing pressure to improve services, especially response (test turnaround) times. There is also a need for laboratories to try to reduce error rates and for laboratory networks to standardize/harmonize processes and policies. Accordingly, we describe our experience with the development and implementation of automated processes for reflex testing and validation of routine coagulation test results. This has been implemented in a large pathology network compromising 27 laboratories and is under consideration for expansion to our larger network (of 60 laboratories). These rules have been custom-built within our laboratory information system (LIS), perform reflex testing of abnormal results, and fully automate the process of routine test validation for appropriate results. These rules also permit adherence to standardized pre-analytical (sample integrity) checks, automate reflex decisions, automate verification, and provide an overall alignment of network practices in a large network of 27 laboratories. In addition, the rules enable clinically significant results to be quickly referred to hematopathologists for review. We also documented an improvement in test turnaround times, with savings in operator time and thus operating costs. Finally, the process was generally well received and determined to be beneficial for most laboratories in our network, in part identified by improved test turnaround times.

Impact of specific preclinical variables on coagulation biomarkers in cancer-associated thrombosis

Coagulation biomarkers are being actively studied for their diagnostic and prognostic value in patients with venous thromboembolism and cancer, as well as in the study of pathogenic mechanisms between cancer and thrombosis. For the results of such studies to be accurate and reproducible, attention must be paid to minimize sources of error in all phases of testing. The pre-analytical phase of laboratory testing is known to be fraught with the majority of errors. Coagulation testing is particularly susceptible to conditions during collection, processing, transport and storage of specimens which can lead to clinically significant errors in results. In addition, changes in pre-analytical conditions can impact different biomarkers differently. Therefore, research studies investigating coagulation biomarkers must carefully standardize not just the analytical phase, but also the pre-analytical phase of testing to ensure accuracy and reliability. We briefly review the impact of pre-analytical conditions on coagulation testing in general, and on specific biomarkers in cancer and thrombosis. In addition, we provide recommendations to reduce pre-analytical errors by developing and sharing standard operating procedures that specifically target standardization of methodologies for collecting specimens and measuring current and emerging coagulation biomarkers in cancer studies.

Effect of fasting status and other pre-analytical variables on quantitation of long-chain fatty acids in red blood cells

Long-chain fatty acids (LCFAs), including omega-3 and omega-6 fatty acids, play essential roles in health maintenance and outcomes. Insufficient intake or the inability to absorb LCFAs from the diet can cause a number of health problems. Evaluation of fatty acid profiles in plasma, serum or red blood cells (RBCs) is routinely used to monitor patients at risk of developing deficiency. Quantitation of LCFAs in RBCs offers advantages over serum/plasma due to low intra-individual variability. Fatty acid composition in RBCs also reflects long-term dietary intake, providing additional information about the patient's nutritional status. However, the literature does not currently address the impact of pre-analytical factors (conditions of RBC collection, sample handling and short-term storage) on LCFA measurements. This study evaluated the effect of several anticoagulants, interferents, different storage conditions and fasting status on quantitation of the twenty-one most abundant LCFAs in RBCs by gas chromatography negative chemical ionization-mass spectrometry (GCNCI-MS). LCFA results were assessed quantitatively (nmol/mL) or as a percent of total. Most common tube types (containing citrate, sodium heparin or EDTA) were all appropriate for blood collection. Whole blood and lysed RBCs were stable at least 24 h at room temperature and up to 7 days refrigerated. Lysed RBCs were also stable for up to three freeze/thaw cycles. The presence of icterus or lipemia did not affect results. LCFAs concentrations in RBCs did not change ~4 h after high-fat intake when the lipid concentration in circulation reaches a peak, while plasma levels of most fatty acids increased up to 40% in response. In summary, RBCs are a reliable sample type for LCFA quantitation in the clinical laboratory. In contrast to plasma or serum, RBCs isolated from non-fasting, hemolyzed or lipemic whole blood specimens are all acceptable for testing. Therefore, RBCs might be a preferable sample type for evaluation of nutritional status of young pediatric patients and in patients with conditions associated with hemolytic anemia or hyperlipidemia.

Measurement of CSF core Alzheimer disease biomarkers for routine clinical diagnosis: do fresh vs frozen samples differ?

Background

Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) amyloid-beta (Aβ) 42/40 ratio, threonine-181-phosphorylated-tau (p-tau), and total-tau (t-tau) represent core biomarkers of Alzheimer disease (AD). The recent availability of automated platforms has represented a significant achievement for reducing the pre-analytical variability of these determinations in clinical setting. With respect to classical manual ELISAs, these platforms give us also the possibility to measure any single sample and to get the result within approximately 30 min. So far, reference values have been calculated from measurements obtained in frozen samples. In this work, we wanted to check if the values obtained in fresh CSF samples differ from those obtained in frozen samples, since this issue is mandatory in routine diagnostic work.

Methods

Fifty-eight consecutive CSF samples have been analyzed immediately after lumbar puncture and after 1-month deep freezing (− 80 °C). As an automated platform, we used Lumipulse G600-II (Fujirebio Inc.). Both the fresh and the frozen aliquots were analyzed in their storage tubes.

Results

In fresh samples, a mean increase of Aβ40 (6%), Aβ42 (2%), p-tau (2%), and t-tau (4%) was observed as compared to frozen samples, whereas a slight decrease was observed for Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio (4%), due to the higher deviation of Aβ40 in fresh samples compared to Aβ42. These differences are significant for Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, p-tau, and t-tau. Nevertheless, the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio showed a lower variability (smaller standard deviation of relative differences) with respect to Aβ42. With respect to the AD profile according to the A/T/(N) criteria for AD diagnosis, no significant changes in classification were observed when comparing results obtained in fresh vs frozen samples.

Conclusions

Small but significant differences have been found for Aβ40, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, p-tau, and t-tau in fresh vs frozen samples. Importantly, these differences did not imply a modification in the A/T/(N) classification system. In order to know if different cutoffs for fresh and frozen samples are required, larger, multi-center investigations are needed.

In search of an evidence-based strategy for quality assessment of human tissue samples: report of the tissue Biospecimen Research Working Group of the Spanish Biobank Network

The purpose of the present work is to underline the importance of obtaining a standardized procedure to ensure and evaluate both clinical and research usability of human tissue samples. The study, which was carried out by the Biospecimen Science Working Group of the Spanish Biobank Network, is based on a general overview of the current situation about quality assurance in human tissue biospecimens. It was conducted an exhaustive review of the analytical techniques used to evaluate the quality of human tissue samples over the past 30 years, as well as their reference values if they were published, and classified them according to the biomolecules evaluated: (i) DNA, (ii) RNA, and (iii) soluble or/and fixed proteins for immunochemistry. More than 130 publications released between 1989 and 2019 were analysed, most of them reporting results focused on the analysis of tumour and biopsy samples. A quality assessment proposal with an algorithm has been developed for both frozen tissue samples and formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples, according to the expected quality of sample based on the available pre-analytical information and the experience of the participants in the Working Group. The high heterogeneity of human tissue samples and the wide number of pre-analytic factors associated to quality of samples makes it very difficult to harmonize the quality criteria. However, the proposed method to assess human tissue sample integrity and antigenicity will not only help to evaluate whether stored human tissue samples fit for the purpose of biomarker development, but will also allow to perform further studies, such as assessing the impact of different pre-analytical factors on very well characterized samples or evaluating the readjustment of tissue sample collection, processing and storing procedures. By ensuring the quality of the samples used on research, the reproducibility of scientific results will be guaranteed.

Targets, pitfalls and reference materials for liquid biopsy tests in cancer diagnostics

Assessment of cell free DNA (cfDNA) and RNA (cfRNA), circulating tumor cells (CTC) and extracellular vesicles (EV) in blood or other bodily fluids can enable early cancer detection, tumor dynamics assessment, minimal residual disease detection and therapy monitoring. However, few liquid biopsy tests progress towards clinical application because results are often discordant and challenging to reproduce. Reproducibility can be enhanced by the development and implementation of standard operating procedures and reference materials to identify and correct for pre-analytical variables. In this review we elaborate on the technological considerations, pre-analytical variables and the use and availability of reference materials for the assessment of liquid biopsy targets in blood and highlight initiatives towards the standardization of liquid biopsy testing.

Towards a unified protocol for handling of CSF before β-amyloid measurements

Background

Widespread implementation of Alzheimer’s disease biomarkers in routine clinical practice requires the establishment of standard operating procedures for pre-analytical handling of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF).

Methods

Here, CSF collection and storage protocols were optimized for measurements of β-amyloid (Aβ). We investigated the effects of (1) storage temperature, (2) storage time, (3) centrifugation, (4) sample mixing, (5) blood contamination, and (6) collection gradient on CSF levels of Aβ. For each study participant, we used fresh CSF directly collected into a protein low binding (LoB) tube that was analyzed within hours after lumbar puncture (LP) as standard of truth. Aβ42 and Aβ40 were measured in de-identified CSF samples using EUROIMMUN and Mesoscale discovery assays.

Results

CSF Aβ42 and Aβ40 were stable for at least 72 h at room temperature (RT), 1 week at 4 °C, and 2 weeks at − 20 °C and − 80 °C. Centrifugation of non-blood-contaminated CSF or mixing of samples before the analysis did not affect Aβ levels. Addition of 0.1–10% blood to CSF that was stored at RT without centrifugation led to a dose- and time-dependent decrease in Aβ42 and Aβ40, while Aβ42/Aβ40 did not change. The effects of blood contamination were mitigated by centrifugation and/or storage at 4 °C or − 20 °C. Aβ levels did not differ between the first to fourth 5-ml portions of CSF.

Conclusions

CSF can be stored for up to 72 h at RT, 1 week at 4 °C, or at least 2 weeks at either − 20 °C or − 80 °C before Aβ measurements. Centrifugation of fresh non-blood-contaminated CSF after LP, or mixing before analysis, is not required. In case of visible blood contamination, centrifugation and storage at 4 °C or − 20 °C is recommended. After discarding the first 2 ml, any portion of up to 20 ml of CSF is suitable for Aβ analysis. These findings will be important for the development of a clinical routine protocol for pre-analytical handling of CSF.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13195-019-0517-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Post-analytical Issues in Hemostasis and Thrombosis Testing

Analytical concerns within hemostasis and thrombosis testing are continuously decreasing. This is essentially attributable to modern instrumentation, improvements in test performance and reliability, as well as the application of appropriate internal quality control and external quality assurance measures. Pre-analytical issues are also being dealt with in some newer instrumentation, which are able to detect hemolysis, icteria and lipemia, and, in some cases, other issues related to sample collection such as tube under-filling. Post-analytical issues are generally related to appropriate reporting and interpretation of test results, and these are the focus of the current overview, which provides a brief description of these events, as well as guidance for their prevention or minimization. In particular, we propose several strategies for improved post-analytical reporting of hemostasis assays and advise that this may provide the final opportunity to prevent serious clinical errors in diagnosis.

Can intervention improve patient safety?

BACKGROUND

Very few Indian studies exist on evaluation of pre-analytical variables affecting "Prothrombin Time" the commonest coagulation assay performed. The study was performed in an Indian tertiary care setting with an aim to assess quantitatively the prevalence of pre-analytical variables and their effects on the results (patient safety), for Prothrombin time test. The study also evaluated their effects on the result and whether intervention, did correct the results.

METHODS

The firstly evaluated the prevalence for various pre-analytical variables detected in samples sent for Prothrombin Time testing. These samples with the detected variables wherever possible were tested and result noted. The samples from the same patients were repeated and retested ensuring that no pre-analytical variable is present. The results were again noted to check for difference the intervention produced.

RESULTS

The study evaluated 9989 samples received for PT/INR over a period of 18 months. The prevalence of different pre-analytical variables was found to be 862 (8.63%). The proportion of various pre-analytical variables detected were haemolysed samples 515 (5.16%), over filled vacutainers 62 (0.62%), under filled vacutainers 39 (0.39%), low values 205 (2.05%), clotted samples 11 (0.11%), wrong labeling 4 (0.04%), wrong vacutainer use 2 (0.02%), chylous samples 7 (0.07%) and samples with more than one variable 17 (0.17%). The comparison of percentage of samples showing errors were noted for the first variables since they could be tested with and without the variable in place. The reduction in error percentage was 91.5%, 69.2%, 81.5% and 95.4% post intervention for haemolysed, overfilled, under filled and samples collected with excess pressure at phlebotomy respectively.

CONCLUSION

Correcting the variables did reduce the error percentage to a great extent in these four variables and hence the variables are found to affect "Prothrombin Time" testing and can hamper patient safety.

Multicentric study of the effect of pre-analytical variables in the quality of plasma samples stored in biobanks using different complementary proteomic methods

Analytical proteomics has experienced exponential progress in the last decade and can be expected to lead research studies on diagnostic and therapeutic biomarkers in the near future. Because the development of this type of analysis requires the use of a large number of human samples with a minimum of quality requirements, our objective was to identify appropriate indicators for quality control of plasma samples stored in biobanks for research in proteomics. To accomplish this, plasma samples from 100 healthy donors were obtained and processed according to the pre-analytical variables of: a) time delay for the first centrifugation of the original blood sample (4 or 24h) and b) number of freeze/thaw cycles (1, 2 or 3) of the processed plasma samples. The analyses of samples were performed by different and complementary methods such as SPE MALDI-TOF, DIGE, shotgun (iTRAQ, nLC MALDI TOF/TOF) and targeted nLC MS/MS proteomic techniques (SRM). In general, because the distribution of proteins in all samples was found to be very similar, the results shown that delayed processing of blood samples and the number of freeze/thaw cycles has little or no effect on the integrity of proteins in the plasma samples.

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of the present work indicate that blood proteins in plasma are broadly insensitive to such preanalytical variables as delayed processing or freeze/thaw cycles when analyzed at the peptide level. Although there are other studies related to protein stability of clinical samples with similar results, what is remarkable about our work is the large number of plasma samples examined and that our analyses assessed protein integrity by combining a wide set of complementary proteomic approaches performed at different proteomic platform participating laboratories that all yielded similar results. We believe our study is the most comprehensive performed to date to determine the changes in proteins induced by delayed sample processing and plasma freeze/thaw cycles.

Influence of pre-analytical and analytical factors on osteoprotegerin measurements

INTRODUCTION

Osteoprotegerin (OPG), an osteoclastogenesis inhibitor implicated in bone remodelling, has emerged as a potential biomarker for cardiovascular disease. In order to implement OPG determination in the clinical laboratory, it is crucial to identify the most appropriate specimen type, preparation and measurement conditions. The present study focuses on identifying the pre-analytical variables that may influence OPG measurements.

METHODS

Serum and plasma (in EDTA, heparin and citrate) were collected from 45 healthy volunteers (men (n=21, 46.7%), women (n=24, 53.3%)). OPG was analysed by ELISA. The influence of the centrifugation speed, the number of freeze-thaw cycles, delay in sample processing, thermo-stability and endogenous interfering agents (haemolysis, triglycerides, bilirubin, cholesterol and RANKL) were studied.

RESULTS

OPG concentrations were significantly lower (p<0.0001) in serum (1015±357 pg/mL) than in all plasma samples (1314±448 pg/mL in EDTA, 1209±417 pg/mL in heparin and 1260±498 pg/mL in citrate). Increasing centrifugation speed (200 g to 3000 g) did not change serum OPG concentration (p=0.88). However, OPG concentration significantly increased when centrifuged serum samples were stored at 48 h at room temperature (p<0.0001). Repeated freeze-thaw cycles did not modify OPG levels until 4 cycles (p<0.0001). Increasing time before processing the samples (2 h and 6 h) raised OPG concentrations both at room temperature (p<0.0001) or 4°C (p<0.001). Positive concentration-dependent interference of triglycerides was found in the analysed pooled samples; however, OPG concentrations were falsely diminished with haemoglobin interference. Bilirubin, cholesterol and RANKL did not interfere with OPG measurements.

Tools to assess tissue quality

Biospecimen science has recognized the importance of tissue quality for accurate molecular and biomarker analysis and efforts are made to standardize tissue procurement, processing and storage conditions of tissue samples. At the same time the field has emphasized the lack of standardization of processes between different laboratories, the variability inherent in the analytical phase and the lack of control over the pre-analytical phase of tissue processing. The problem extends back into tissue samples in biorepositories, which are often decades old and where documentation about tissue processing might not be available. This review highlights pre-analytical variations in tissue handling, processing, fixation and storage and emphasizes the effects of these variables on nucleic acids and proteins in harvested tissue. Finally current tools for quality control regarding molecular or biomarker analysis are summarized and discussed.

The impact of pre-analytical variables on the stability of neurofilament proteins in CSF, determined by a novel validated SinglePlex Luminex assay and ELISA

BACKGROUND

Neurofilament (Nf) proteins have been shown to be promising biomarkers for monitoring and predicting disease progression for various neurological diseases. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of pre-analytical variables on the concentration of neurofilament heavy (NfH) and neurofilament light (NfL) proteins.

METHODS

For NfH an in-house newly-developed and validated SinglePlex Luminex assay was used; ELISA was used to analyze NfL.

RESULTS

For the NfL ELISA assay, the intra- and inter-assay variation was respectively, 1.5% and 16.7%. Analytical performance of the NfH SinglePlex Luminex assay in terms of sensitivity (6.6pg/mL), recovery in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) (between 90 and 104%), linearity (from 6.6-1250pg/mL), and inter- and intra-assay variation (<8%) were good. Concentrations of both NfL and NfH appeared not negatively affected by blood contamination, repeated freeze-thaw cycles (up to 4), delayed processing (up to 24hours) and during long-term storage at -20°C, 4°C, and room temperature. A decrease in concentration was observed during storage of both neurofilament proteins up to 21days at 37°C, which was significant by day 5.

CONCLUSIONS

The newly developed NfH SinglePlex Luminex assay has a good sensitivity and is robust. Moreover, both NfH and NfL are stable under the most prevalent pre-analytical variations.