Effect of successive endoscopic procedures in polyp and adenoma detection rates: Too early is not always too good

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of hypothetical cumulative fatigue after performing too many endoscopic procedures on both polyp and adenoma detection rates (PDR, and ADR, respectively). The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of successive endoscopic procedures on PDR and ADR.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study was undertaken among consecutive patients on whom colonoscopy and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy were performed between January 2012 and August 2014. Data regarding polyp and adenoma detection, cecal intubation, and bowel cleansing quality as well as demographical data of subjects were extracted. Endoscopic procedures were classified according to the time slots of the procedures throughout the endoscopy session in three groups: from the 1st to 4th endoscopy study (round 1), from the 5th to the 8th study (round 2), above the 9th study (round 3). We compared PDR and ADR among rounds.

RESULTS

Overall, 3388 patients were enrolled. Median age was 50 years (range 18-95) and 52.39% were female. There was a significant difference in terms of PDR among rounds (36.83%, 41.24%, and 43.38%, respectively, p = 0.007) and a non-significant numerical difference when ADR was compared (23.2%, 25.71%, and 26.78%, p = 0.07). On multivariate analysis, ADR was significantly associated with age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02 [1.01-1.03]), and male sex (OR 1.64 [1.38-1.94]).

CONCLUSION

Theoretical endoscopist's fatigue due to cumulative performance of endoscopies does not diminish colonoscopy quality. Both PDR and ADR seem to improve after endoscopist's cumulative rounds of performed endoscopies. This could be due to a "warm-up" effect.

[Human papillomavirus nonavalent vaccine. Update 2017]

Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the causative agent of 5% of human cancers. HPV infection is necessary for the development of cervical cancer and is responsible of a variable percentage of cancers of anus, vulva, vagina, penis, and oropharynx. Since 2007, 2 vaccines against HPV have been commercially available in Spain: bivalent (HPV types 16/18), and tetravalent (HPV types 6/11/16/18). In order to extend the protection afforded by HPV vaccines, a clinical program was launched in 2006 for the new nonavalent vaccine, including 9 HPV types (6/11/16/18/31/33/45/52/58). These types are responsible for 90% of cervical cancers, 82% of high-grade ano-genital pre-cancerous lesions, and 90% of genital warts. The purpose of this publication is to provide healthcare professionals with the scientific evidence that supports the new vaccine, as well as the clinical value that it offers in our environment.