Role of three-dimensional cell culture in therapeutics and diagnostics: an updated review

Drug development and testing are a tedious and expensive process with a high degree of uncertainty in the clinical success and preclinical validation of manufactured therapeutic agents. Currently, to understand the drug action, disease mechanism, and drug testing, most therapeutic drug manufacturers use 2D cell culture models to validate the drug action. However, there are many uncertainties and limitations with the conventional use of 2D (monolayer) cell culture models for drug testing that are primarily attributed due to poor mimicking of cellular mechanisms, disturbance in environmental interaction, and changes in structural morphology. To overcome such odds and difficulties in the preclinical validation of therapeutic medications, newer in vivo drug testing cell culture models with higher screening efficiencies are required. One such promising and advanced cell culture model reported recently is the "three-dimensional cell culture model." The 3D cell culture models are reported to show evident benefits over conventional 2D cell models. This review article outlines and describes the current advancement in cell culture models, their types, significance in high-throughput screening, limitations, applications in drug toxicity screening, and preclinical testing methodologies to predict in vivo efficacy.

A guide to preclinical evaluation of hydrogel-based devices for treatment of cartilage lesions

The drive to develop cartilage implants for the treatment of major defects in the musculoskeletal system has resulted in a major research thrust towards developing biomaterial devices for cartilage repair. Investigational devices for the restoration of articular cartilage are considered as significant risk materials by regulatory bodies and therefore proof of efficacy and safety prior to clinical testing represents a critical phase of the multidisciplinary effort to bridge the gap between bench and bedside. To date, review articles have thoroughly covered different scientific facets of cartilage engineering paradigm, but surprisingly, little attention has been given to the preclinical considerations revolving around the validation of a biomaterial implant. Considering hydrogel-based cartilage products as an example, the present review endeavors to provide a summary of the critical prerequisites that such devices should meet for cartilage repair, for successful implantation and subsequent preclinical validation prior to clinical trials. Considerations pertaining to the choice of appropriate animal model, characterization techniques for the quantitative and qualitative outcome measures, as well as concerns with respect to GLP practices are also extensively discussed. This article is not meant to provide a systematic review, but rather to introduce a device validation-based roadmap to the academic investigator, in anticipation of future healthcare commercialization. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: There are significant challenges around translation of in vitro cartilage repair strategies to approved therapies. New biomaterial-based devices must undergo exhaustive investigations to ensure their safety and efficacy prior to clinical trials. These considerations are required to be applied from early developmental stages. Although there are numerous research works on cartilage devices and their in vivo evaluations, little attention has been given into the preclinical pathway and the corresponding approval processes. With a focus on hydrogel devices to concretely illustrate the preclinical path, this review paper intends to highlight the various considerations regarding the preclinical validation of hydrogel devices for cartilage repair, from regulatory considerations, to implantation strategies, device performance aspects and characterizations.

Effects of route of administration on neural exposure to platinum-based chemotherapy treatment: a pharmacokinetic study in rat

The persisting need for effective clinical treatment of chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity (CIN) motivates critical evaluation of preclinical models of CIN for their translational relevance. The present study aimed to provide the first quantitative evaluation of neural tissue exposed in vivo to a platinum-based anticancer compound, oxaliplatin (OX) during and after two commonly used dosing regimens: slow IV infusion used clinically and bolus IP injection used preclinically. Inductively-coupled plasma mass spectrometry analysis of dorsal root ganglia indicated that while differences in the temporal dynamics of platinum distribution exist, key drivers of neurotoxicity, e.g. peak concentrations and exposure, were not different across the two routes of administration. We conclude that the IP route of OX administration achieves clinically relevant pharmacokinetic exposure of neural tissues in a rodent model of CIN.