Effect of Different Preparation Designs of Minimally Invasive Occlusal Onlays on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners: An In Vitro Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this in vitro study was to assess and compare three different preparation designs of minimally invasive occlusal onlays on the trueness and precision of three different intraoral scanners under two different scanning conditions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Three maxillary premolars were prepared in three different designs and divided accordingly into 3 groups, Group 1: Anatomical (n = 60), Group 2: Flat (n = 60), and Group 3: Ferrule (n = 60). The samples were then further divided into subgroups according to scanners as subgroup A: Medit i500 (n = 20), subgroup B: 3Shape TRIOS 4 (n = 20), and subgroup C: Cerec Primescan (n = 20). Lastly, the samples were further divided according to scanning conditions as: Division i: As prepared (n = 10) and Division ii: Sprayed - scan spray (n = 10). An industrial 3D scanner was used to obtain the reference STL files. Accuracy was assessed in terms of trueness and precision and recorded in terms of root mean square in μm. Numerical data were explored for normality using Shapiro-Wilk test and were analyzed using 3-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test.

RESULTS

Regarding trueness, 3-way ANOVA showed that all tested variables had a significant effect on trueness. Significant interactions were found between the different variables (p<0.001) (Table 1). For preparation design the highest value was found in ferrule preparation (27.88 ±7.11), followed by flat preparation (22.99 ±7.56), while the lowest value was found in anatomical preparation (18.83 ±5.71)(p<0.001). For Scanner type, the highest value was found in Primescan (25.36 ±10.66), followed by TRIOS 4 (22.75 ±5.98), while the lowest value was found in Medit i500 (21.59 ±5.03)(p<0.001). As for the scanning condition, sprayed samples (26.54 ±8.24) had a significantly higher value than non-sprayed samples (19.93 ±5.53) (p<0.001). Regarding precision, both preparation design and scanner type had a significant effect on precision. Scanning conditions had no significant effect. There was a significant interaction between the three tested variables (p = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

Anatomical preparation of minimally invasive occlusal onlays produced the most accurate scans. Within the tested preparation designs, Medit i500 and 3Shape TRIOS 4 have better trueness than Cerec Primescan regarding. Cerec Primescan is more precise than 3Shape TRIOS 4 and Medit i500 Scan spray application causes a higher deviation in the trueness of the tested intraoral scanners while it does not affect their precision. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Fatigue behavior, failure mode, and stress distribution of occlusal veneers: influence of the prosthetic preparation cusp inclinations and the type of restorative material

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of cusp inclination of the prosthetic preparation's occlusal surface and type of restorative material on the fatigue behavior, failure mode, and stress distribution of occlusal veneers.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Glass fiber-reinforced epoxy resin prosthetic preparations for occlusal veneers with three different occlusal surface cusp inclination degrees (0°, 15°, and 30°) were produced and assigned into six testing groups (n = 11) according to the cusp inclination (0°, 15°, or 30°) and type of restorative material (lithium disilicate-LD or resin composite-RC). Despite different substrate preparation cusp inclination degrees, the restorations were designed maintaining 30° inclination between the cusps at the occlusal surface and a thickness of 0.7 mm at the central groove region of the restorations to be machined in a CAD/CAM system. After cementation, the specimens were stored for about 7 days (under water at 37 °C), and subsequently submitted to a load to failure test (n = 2) and an intermittent cyclic fatigue test (n = 9) (initial load: 100 N; step size: 50 N; cycles/step: 10,000; loading frequency: 20 Hz; loading piston: 6-mm-diameter stainless steel) until observing cracks. The data were analyzed by two-way ANOVA, Kaplan-Meier, and Mantel-Cox post hoc tests. Finite element analysis (FEA) and fractographic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The fatigue performance of LD and RC occlusal veneers was evaluated based on different prosthetic preparation cusp inclinations. The 0° inclination showed the best fatigue performance for both materials (LD: 944N, RC: 861N), while the 15° and 30° inclinations had lower values (LD: 800N and 533N, RC: 739N and 717N, respectively). The study also found that for a 0° inclination, LD occlusal veneers performed better than RC ones (LD: 944 N > RC: 861N), while for a 30° inclination, RC occlusal veneers had better fatigue performance than LD ones (LD: 533N < RC: 717N). No significant difference was observed between the materials for a 15° inclination (LD: 800N = RC: 739N). The FEA results showed a higher tensile stress concentration on lithium disilicate than on resin composite occlusal veneers. All lithium disilicate occlusal veneers showed radial crack failures, while resin composite occlusal veneers showed Hertzian cone cracks and radial cracks combined.

CONCLUSION

Considering mechanical perspective only, RC occlusal veneers should be indicated when prosthetic preparation cusps inclinations are 30°. When 0° prosthetic preparation cusps inclinations are observed, LD occlusal veneers will behave mechanically better. When a 15° cusp inclination is preserved, both restorative materials behave similarly.

Durability of cantilever inlay-retained fixed dental prosthesis fabricated from multilayered zirconia ceramics with different designs

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in-vitro study was to investigate the effect of framework design on fracture resistance and failure modes of cantilever inlay-retained fixed partial dentures (IRFDPs) fabricated from two multilayered monolithic zirconia materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-two natural premolar teeth were prepared as abutments for cantilever IRFDPs using three designs: mesial-occlusal (MO) inlay with short buccal and palatal wings (D1), MO inlay with long palatal wing (D2), MO inlay with long palatal wing and occlusal extension (D3). Full-contoured IRFDPs were fabricated from two monolithic zirconia materials; IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime and Zolid Gen-X. Adhesive surfaces were air-abraded and bonded with MDP-containing resin cement. Specimens were subjected to thermocycling (5-55 °C, 5000 cycles); then, mechanical loading (1.2 × 10⁶ cycles, 49 N). Surviving specimens were loaded until failure in the universal testing machine. All specimens were examined under stereomicroscope, and two samples from each group were evaluated using Scanning Electron Microscope.

RESULTS

Mean failure loads were not significantly different between different framework designs or between two materials. However, IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime showed significantly higher failure rate than Zolid Gen-X during dynamic fatigue (p = 0.009). Samples with D1 design showed higher debonding rate, D2 failed mainly by fracture of the palatal wing and debonding, and D3 failed mainly by fracture of the abutment tooth. Debonded restorations showed mainly mixed failures.

CONCLUSION

Cantilever IRFDPs with framework designs that maximize adhesion to enamel exhibited promising results. IPS e.max ZirCAD Prime was more susceptible to fractures with the long palatal wing design.

OCT evaluation of the internal adaptation of ceramic veneers depending on preparation design and ceramic thickness

OBJECTIVES

In-vitro evaluation of the influence of preparation design and thickness of ceramic veneers on the interfacial bond using optical coherence tomography (OCT).

METHODS

Sixty-four central incisors were randomly assigned to four preparation designs differing from no to complete dentine exposure (n = 16 each): non-prep (NP), minimal-invasive (MI, no dentine exposure), semi-invasive (SI, 50% dentine) and invasive (I, 100% dentine). Ceramic veneers (IPS InLine Veneer) of two thicknesses (0.2-0.5 mm (T1) and > 0.5-1.2 mm (T2)) were etched, silanized, and adhesively luted (Optibond FL, Variolink Veneer). After water storage (37 °C, 21d), thermocycling (2000 cycles, 5°-55 °C), and mechanical loading (2 + 1 million cycles, 50 + 100 N) specimens were imaged by spectral-domain OCT (Telesto II, Thorlabs). Adhesive defects at the ceramic-composite and tooth-composite interfaces were quantified on 35 equidistantly distributed OCT B-scans (length, %). Statistical differences were verified with Wilcoxon-/Mann-Whitney-U-test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

Adhesive defects appeared in all groups at both interfaces, albeit to differing extents (0.1 - 31.7%). NP and MI veneers showed no significant differences at the interfaces (p_i > 0.05). In groups, SI and I, significantly more adhesive defects appeared at the tooth-composite compared to the veneer-composite interface (p_i ≤ 0.039). The following preparation designs and veneer thicknesses showed differences (p_i ≤ 0.021): Veneer-composite: NP-T1 < I-T1, MI-T1 < I-T1, I-T1 > I-T2; Tooth-composite: NP-T1 < SI-T1, NP-T1 < I-T1, NP-T2 > MI-T2, MI-T1 < SI-T1, MI-T1 < I-T1, SI-T1 < I-T1, MI-T2 < SI-T2, MI-T2 < I-T2.

SIGNIFICANCE

The interface adhesion of ceramic veneers was influenced by the preparation design and the veneer thickness. A ceramic thickness of at least 0.5 mm and a preparation without exposing dentine is advantageous for the interfacial bond.

Influence of intraoral scanning on the quality of preparations for all-ceramic single crowns

Objectives

To evaluate the influence of intraoral scanning on the quality of preparations for all-ceramic single crowns.

Material and methods

A total of 690 randomly selected and anonymized in vivo single crown preparations were examined. Three hundred twenty-three preparations were directly recorded with an intraoral scanner (group IS). Data from plaster casts digitized by a laboratory scanner (group ID; N = 367) served as control. Comparisons included convergence angle, marginal design, marginal substance reduction, homogeneity of the finish line, and undercuts. Evaluation was performed using fully automated specialized software. Data were analyzed applying Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann-Whitney U test, and Fisher’s exact test. Level of significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Convergence angle was above optimum in both groups, but significantly larger for group IS (p < 0.001). Marginal design was more ideal in group IS concerning the absence of featheredge design (p < 0.001) and reverse bevel (p = 0.211). Marginal substance reduction was closer to prerequisites for all-ceramic restorations in group IS (p < 0.001). Finish lines were more homogeneous in group IS regarding the uniformity of their course (p < 0.001). Undercuts were more frequently found in group ID than in group IS (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoral scanning of prepared teeth has positive impact on the quality of preparations for all-ceramic single crowns regarding marginal substance reduction, marginal design, homogeneity of the finish line, and undercuts.

Clinical relevance

Accurate preparation design represents a fundamental condition for success of ceramic crowns. Since there is potential for optimization, intraoral scanning might enhance preparation quality providing instant visual feedback.

Effect of preparation design on the fracture behavior of ceramic occlusal veneers in maxillary premolars

OBJECTIVES

The fracture strengths of four types of occlusal veneers and a traditional full crown ceramic restoration and the influence of preparation design on the stress of restorations were examined.

METHODS

Forty intact maxillary premolars randomly divided into five groups were prepared based on the demands of type O (occlusal surface coverage), OF (occlusal and lingual surface coverage), POF (occlusal, lingual, and mesial surface coverage), and POFP (occlusal, lingual, mesial, and distal surface coverage) veneers and full crown, and then restored by glass ceramic. Specimens were subjected to fracture resistance tests after cyclic loading. The fracture strengths and modes were analyzed statistically. The level of significance was set at α = 0.05. One maxillary premolar was prepared for type O, OF, POF, POFP veneer and full crown, and then scanned to establish finite element models. The mean fracture load was applied vertically to calculate the maximum principal stress on the ceramic.

RESULTS

Type O veneer showed higher fracture strength than type POF and POFP veneers (P < 0.05). Both type O and OF veneers exhibited higher fracture strength than full crown (P < 0.05). No significant difference in failure mode was observed. The maximum principal stress for type O, OF, POF, POFP veneers, and full crown increased progressively and concentrated at the bonding surface directly beneath the loading area.

CONCLUSIONS

Four types of occlusal veneer showed fracture strengths that considerably exceeded normal biting forces. They represent conservative alternatives to full crowns and present a viable treatment for severely worn teeth.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The occlusal veneers with different preparation designs, including type O, OF, POF and POFP veneers, show higher fracture resistances than traditional full coverage crowns that considerably exceed the normal biting forces. Therefore, these represent conservative alternatives to crown restorations and present a viable treatment for restoring severely worn teeth.

Estimation of stress distribution and risk of failure for maxillary premolar restored by occlusal veneer with different CAD/CAM materials and preparation designs

OBJECTIVES

To compare stress distribution and failure probability in maxillary premolars restored by simple occlusal veneer (SOV) and buccal-occlusal veneer (BOV) with 3 different CAD/CAM materials.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A maxillary premolar was digitized by a micro-CT scanner. Three-dimensional dynamic scan data were transformed, and finite element models of 2 different models (SOV and BOV restored teeth) were designed. Three different CAD/CAM materials, including lithium disilicate glass ceramic (LD) IPS e.max CAD, polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network (PICN) Vita Enamic, and resin nano-ceramic (RNC) Lava Ultimate, were designated to both veneers. Maximum principle stresses were determined by applying a 300-N axial load to the occlusal surface. Weibull analyses were performed to calculate the failure probability of the models.

RESULTS

LD-restored teeth showed the highest stress in the veneer, lowest stress in substrate teeth, and lowest failure probability for the overall system; RNC-restored teeth showed the lowest stress in the veneer, highest stress in substrate teeth, and highest failure probability. No significant differences were found in the cement layer among the different models. No significant differences of stress and failure probability existed between SOV and BOV preparations.

CONCLUSIONS

CAD/CAM composite resin occlusal veneers bear lower maximum stress than ceramic veneers. Teeth restored by composite veneers are more prone to failure than those restored by ceramic veneers. Additional reduction of the buccal surface did not increase the stress on the occlusal veneer under axial load.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Both occlusal veneers could be used under physiological masticatory force. CAD/CAM glass ceramic was safer than composite resins.