|
1
|
Chan RJ, Crawford-Williams F, Crichton M, Joseph R, Hart NH, Milley K, Druce P, Zhang J, Jefford M, Lisy K, Emery J, Nekhlyudov L. Effectiveness and implementation of models of cancer survivorship care: an overview of systematic reviews. J Cancer Surviv 2023; 17:197-221. [PMID: 34786652 PMCID: PMC8594645 DOI: 10.1007/s11764-021-01128-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To critically assess the effectiveness and implementation of different models of post-treatment cancer survivorship care compared to specialist-led models of survivorship care assessed in published systematic reviews. METHODS MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched from January 2005 to May 2021. Systematic reviews that compared at least two models of cancer survivorship care were included. Article selection, data extraction, and critical appraisal were conducted independently by two authors. The models were evaluated according to cancer survivorship care domains, patient and caregiver experience, communication and decision-making, care coordination, quality of life, healthcare utilization, costs, and mortality. Barriers and facilitators to implementation were also synthesized. RESULTS Twelve systematic reviews were included, capturing 53 primary studies. Effectiveness for managing survivors' physical and psychosocial outcomes was found to be no different across models. Nurse-led and primary care provider-led models may produce cost savings to cancer survivors and healthcare systems. Barriers to the implementation of different models of care included limited resources, communication, and care coordination, while facilitators included survivor engagement, planning, and flexible services. CONCLUSIONS Despite evidence regarding the equivalent effectiveness of nurse-led, primary care-led, or shared care models, these models are not widely adopted, and evidence-based recommendations to guide implementation are required. Further research is needed to address effectiveness in understudied domains of care and outcomes and across different population groups. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS Rather than aiming for an optimal "one-size fits all" model of survivorship care, applying the most appropriate model in distinct contexts can improve outcomes and healthcare efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raymond J Chan
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South, Australia.
- Division of Cancer Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
| | - Fiona Crawford-Williams
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Megan Crichton
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- Bond University Nutrition and Dietetics Research Group, Faculty of Health Science & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, QLD, Australia
| | - Ria Joseph
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
| | - Nicolas H Hart
- Caring Futures Institute, College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, South, Australia
- Cancer and Palliative Care Outcomes Centre, School of Nursing, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
- School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia
- Institute for Health Research, University of Notre Dame Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
| | - Kristi Milley
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Paige Druce
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jianrong Zhang
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Michael Jefford
- Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Karolina Lisy
- Department of Oncology, Sir Peter MacCallum, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
- Australian Cancer Survivorship Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jon Emery
- Primary Care Collaborative Cancer Clinical Trials Group (PC4), Carlton, VIC, Australia
- Centre for Cancer Research and Department of General Practice, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Larissa Nekhlyudov
- Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|