Villa F, Mignon D, Polydorides S, Simonson T. Comparing pairwise-additive and many-body generalized Born models for acid/base calculations and protein design.
J Comput Chem 2017;
38:2396-2410. [PMID:
28749575 DOI:
10.1002/jcc.24898]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2017] [Revised: 06/30/2017] [Accepted: 07/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Generalized Born (GB) solvent models are common in acid/base calculations and protein design. With GB, the interaction between a pair of solute atoms depends on the shape of the protein/solvent boundary and, therefore, the positions of all solute atoms, so that GB is a many-body potential. For compute-intensive applications, the model is often simplified further, by introducing a mean, native-like protein/solvent boundary, which removes the many-body property. We investigate a method for both acid/base calculations and protein design that uses Monte Carlo simulations in which side chains can explore rotamers, bind/release protons, or mutate. The fluctuating protein/solvent dielectric boundary is treated in a way that is numerically exact (within the GB framework), in contrast to a mean boundary. Its originality is that it captures the many-body character while retaining the residue-pairwise complexity given by a fixed boundary. The method is implemented in the Proteus protein design software. It yields a slight but systematic improvement for acid/base constants in nine proteins and a significant improvement for the computational design of three PDZ domains. It eliminates a source of model uncertainty, which will facilitate the analysis of other model limitations. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse