Proton pump inhibitors in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) related to oral immunotherapy: is it as effective as in other EoE?

Oral immunotherapy (OIT) may induce eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are an effective treatment for EoE. However, the effect of PPI treatment is not well established in patients with EoE induced by OIT. Our primary aim was to compare the clinical, endoscopic, and histological response rates to PPIs in children with EoE induced by OIT (EoE+OIT) versus EoE patients without OIT (EoE-OIT). The secondary aims are to describe the clinical and histological features of EoE+OIT. Demographic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological findings of patients with EoE in the gastroenterology clinic at Shamir Medical Center between March 2015 and December 2022 were collected. Comparisons were performed between EoE+OIT and EoE-OIT patients. The study included 42 children (74% male, mean age 11.2), of whom 31 had EoE-OIT and 11 had EoE+OIT. There were no significant differences between groups regarding sex, comorbidities, symptoms, or endoscopic and histological characteristics at diagnosis. All 42 children were treated with PPIs after diagnosis with or without diet changes. The rates of any clinical response were 83.9% and 90.1% in the EoE-OIT group and EoE+OIT group, respectively (p = 1.0). The rate of any endoscopic response was 74.2% for EoE-OIT and 81.8% for EoE+OIT (p = 0.54). Histologically, PPIs were even more effective in the EoE+OIT group, where only 18.2% had no histological response at all compared to 51.6% in the EoE-OIT group (p = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

PPI treatment is as effective in EoE with OIT as it is in EoE due to other etiologies.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment is effective for achieving clinical response and histologic remission in some patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). • EoE has also been reported to be triggered by oral immunotherapy (OIT).

WHAT IS NEW

• PPI treatment in EoE with OIT is as effective as treatment for EoE due to other etiologies.

Influence of proton pump inhibitor use on clinical outcomes of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

OBJECTIVE

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with reduced diversity of the gut microbiome and may lead to worse clinical outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We aimed to evaluate whether PPI use affects clinical outcomes in a real-world setting.

DESIGN

Healthcare claims data of adult IBD patients were obtained from the IBM MarketScan Database. Multivariable analysis and propensity score-matched analysis were performed to assess associations between PPI use and new biologic start, and IBD-related hospitalizations and surgeries.

RESULTS

A total of 46,234 IBD patients were identified (6,488 (14%) and 39,746 (86%) patients with and without PPI, respectively). Patients on PPI were more likely to be older, female, and smokers and less likely to be on immunomodulators. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that PPI use was associated with new biologic start (odds ratio (OR) 1.11, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.04-1.18), and IBD-related admissions (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.74-2.19) and surgeries (OR 1.46, 95% CI 1.26-1.71). Following propensity score matching, patients on PPI remained more likely to start a new biologic (23% vs 21%, p = 0.011), and have IBD-related admissions (8% vs 4%, p < 0.001) and surgeries (4% vs 2%, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses stratified by age, smoking, and glucocorticoid use showed similar results. There was a dose-response relationship between the number of PPI prescriptions and the risk of new biologic use (p < 0.001) and IBD-related admissions (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

PPI use was associated with worse clinical outcomes in patients with IBD in the real-world setting. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings, but caution may be needed when prescribing a PPI to IBD patients.Study highlights WHAT IS KNOWNProton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are one of the most prescribed therapies in the United States (US).Reduction of gastric acid secretion by PPI use increases the risk of imbalance in gut microbiota composition and may increase the risk of enteric infections.Recent studies have reported that the use of PPI was associated with development of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and reduced rates of remission in patients on infliximab therapy, which may be due to alterations of intestinal microbiota.WHAT IS NEW HEREIn a large real-world US healthcare database study, IBD patients with PPI use were more likely to have a new biologic medication started, have an IBD-related surgery, and have an IBD-related hospitalization, which remained significant after adjusting for confounders by multivariable analysis, propensity-score matched analysis, and subgroup analysis.Appropriate clinical review of PPI necessity may need to be performed in patients with IBD when considering prescribing a PPI or who are already on PPI therapy.

Multicentre prospective study to evaluate effectiveness and safety of gel-forming and hyaluronic-acid containing chewable tablets as add-on treatment in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) symptoms and unsatisfying proton pump inhibitor therapy

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common disease which in the majority of patients is treated with proton pump inhibitors (PPI). However, up to 45% of the patients remain symptomatic on a standard dose of PPI. This study investigated the effectiveness and safety of an add-on therapy with the gel-forming chewable tablet Sobrade® in patients unsatisfied with PPI treatment. The bioadhesive gel covers the oesophagus and thereby protects the mucosa from reflux events.

METHODS

47 patients with symptomatic GERD despite PPI treatment participated in this study. The gel-forming tablets were taken up to four times daily after meals and prior to bedtime. Severity and frequency of GERD symptoms were evaluated during two onsite visits prior and following 14 days of treatment and used to calculate the GERD score of the Reflux Disease Questionnaire. Furthermore, patients recorded symptoms as well as onset and duration of symptoms relief daily in their electronic dairies. Effectiveness of treatment was analysed using non-parametric paired Wilcoxon test. In addition, anchor-based minimal important differences (MID) were assessed.

RESULTS

Treatment resulted in significant reduction of GERD symptoms. Severity and frequency of 8 of the 9 assessed symptoms improved significantly during the treatment phase whereby most pronounced improvement was observed for heartburn. In agreement, all three subscales of the GERD score improved significantly. MID results suggest that patients considered a mean improvement of symptoms > 30% of initial severity as beneficial. Self-assessments by patients revealed first significant improvements of symptoms like heartburn and regurgitation from day 5 of treatment onwards. 49% of patients reported relief of symptoms within 15 min which lasted on average for 3.5 h. During the study no treatment emergent adverse events were reported and in 98% of all cases tolerability of the product was rated as very good or good.

CONCLUSIONS

This study revealed a pronounced improvement of the symptoms after add-on treatment with the gel-forming medical device. The very good safety and tolerability profile indicate an advantageous risk-benefit ratio.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This non-interventional study was prospectively positively evaluated by the responsible ethic-committees.

Association between hospital-acquired pneumonia and proton pump inhibitor prophylaxis in patients treated with glucocorticoids: a retrospective cohort study based on 307,622 admissions in China

Background

Prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in patients treated with glucocorticoid therapy is a common phenomenon in the general wards of Chinese hospitals. Many of these prescriptions are inappropriate and lead to overuse. Hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) is a possible adverse effect for this combination but remains controversial.

Methods

We designed a retrospective cohort study using electronic medical record databases from multiple hospitals to investigate whether PPI prophylaxis increases the risk of HAP in hospitalized patients receiving glucocorticoid therapy. The study population was adult patients who were not critical and treated with at least 1 dose of glucocorticoid during hospitalization and the exposure factor was PPIs prophylaxis. The odds ratio of HAP between the exposed and unexposed groups was calculated based on the cohort which was established by propensity score matching. The dose-effect relationship between PPI prophylaxis and HAP was also evaluated.

Results

Among the 307,622 admissions eligible for the study, a total of 217,460 (70.7%) admissions had a record of PPI prophylaxis. After reconstructed the cohort by propensity score matching, the exposed and unexposed groups both included 83,786 admissions. The incidence of HAP in the exposed group was higher than that in the unexposed group (2.1% vs. 1.5%, OR: 1.4, 95% CI: 1.3 to 1.5). The risk of HAP increased when the cumulative dose of PPI during hospital was more than 2 defined drug doses. Compared to the unexposed group, the adjusted odds ratio was 1.3 (95% CI: 1.2 to 1.4) in the medium-dose group (2-7 defined drug doses) and 1.9 (95% CI: 1.8 to 2.1) in the high-dose group (>7 defined drug doses).

Conclusions

PPI prophylaxis increased the risk of HAP in hospitalized patients treated with glucocorticoid therapy and the risk of HAP increased as the dose of PPIs accumulated.

[Clinical Management of Non-Variceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding]

Non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding (NVUGIB) is defined as bleeding proximal to the ligament of Treitz in the absence of varices. As a common clinical problem, NVUGIB entails a heavy burden on the healthcare system. In addition to endoscopic hemostasis, evaluation and treatment before and after endoscopy are also of critical importance for the clinical management of NVUGIB patients. In recent years, based on the rapid development of endoscopic technology and clinical management of NVUGIB, the research evidence and clinical guidelines have been updated internationally, while some clinical decisions remain controversial. In this article, we mainly reviewed and discussed the current status of NVUGIB patient management before, during, and after endoscopy, aiming to deepen the understanding of the disease for clinicians, and to promote standardized management of patients with NVUGIB.

Low-dose PPI to prevent bleeding after ESD: A multicenter randomized controlled study

BACKGROUND

Although proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in the prevention of gastric bleeding caused by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), there is no consensus on the optimal regimen for these patients. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether intermittent use of low-dose PPI is sufficient to prevent post-ESD bleeding.

METHODS

This multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 9 hospitals in China. Consecutive eligible patients with a diagnosis of gastric mucosal lesions after ESD treatment were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either intermittent low-dose or continuous high-dose PPIs treatment. After three days, all patients administered orally esomeprazole 40 mg once a day for 8 weeks. The primary endpoint was post-ESD bleeding within 7 days. Analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle with the non-inferiority margin (Δ) of 5%.

RESULTS

526 consecutive patients were assessed for eligibility from 30 September 2017 to 30 July 2019, of whom 414 were randomly assigned to low-dose (n = 209) or high-dose (n = 205) esomeprazole treatment group without dropouts within7 days. The total post-ESD bleeding is occurred in 13 (6.2 %, 95 % CI 3.3-9.6) of 209 within 7 days in the intermittent low-dose group, and 12 (5.9 %, 95 % CI 2.9-9.3) of 205 in the continuous high-dose group. The absolute risk reduction (ARR) was 0.4 % (-4.2, 4.9). One month after ESD, There are 44 patients (21.1 %, 95 % CI 15.8, 26.8) and 39 patients (19.0 % 95 % CI 13.7, 24.4) in scar stage respectively in low-dose group and high-dose group (P = 0.875).The hospital costs in the low-dose PPI group was lower than high -dose group (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

The intermittent use of low-dose PPIs is sufficient to prevent post-ESD bleeding. It might be applied in clinical practice to prevent post-ESD bleeding and reduce the costs related to PPIs.

Can Impedance-pH Testing on Medications Reliably Identify Patients with GERD as Defined by Pathologic Esophageal Acid Exposure off Medications?

INTRODUCTION

Impedance-pH testing (MII-pH) while patients are on acid suppression medications is frequently used to evaluate persistent reflux symptoms. The aim of this study was to determine whether MII-pH on medications can reliably identify patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) as defined by pathologic esophageal acid exposure off medications, and to determine if there is a threshold of total reflux episodes on medications where pH testing off medications may be unnecessary.

METHODS

A retrospective review identified all patients between 1/2010 and 4/2017 who underwent MII-pH testing on PPI medications and subsequently had pH testing off medications. GERD was defined on pH testing off medications by an abnormal DeMeester Score (DMS) and on MII-pH on medications by ≥ 48 total reflux episodes. Patients with an abnormal DMS by MII-pH on medications were excluded.

RESULTS

There were 71 patients, (22 males; 49 females), with a median age of 52 years. Based on ≥ 48 total reflux episodes by MII-pH testing on medications, 42 patients (59%) had GERD. When tested off medications, an abnormal DMS was present in 44 patients (62%). Among those with GERD based on impedance testing on medications, 31% did not have GERD based on pH testing off medications. Further, in the 29 patients with ≤ 48 total reflux episodes on MII-pH (normal test), 15 patients (52%) had pathologic acid exposure off medications. When there were > 73 reflux events with MII-pH on medications, all 15 patients in our series had pathologic acid exposure on pH testing off medications.

CONCLUSION

MII-pH testing on medications in patients with refractory GERD symptoms does not reliably correlate with a diagnosis of GERD as defined by pathologic esophageal acid exposure off medications. The commonly used abnormal MII-pH test value of ≥ 48 total reflux episodes is not validated and should not be used. However, in our series, patients with > 73 total reflux episodes had a high likelihood of having pathologic acid exposure off medications. Overall, the preferred strategy to evaluate patients with persistent GERD symptoms on acid suppression therapy should be pH testing off medications.

Efficacy and safety of clopidogrel only vs. clopidogrel added proton pump inhibitors in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Controversy still exists that whether clopidogrel should add proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel added proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) vs. clopidogrel for the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

Methods and results

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, the Chinese Biomedical Medical Literature database, and the Cochrane Library for all clinical trials that were published on this topic through October 2018. We specifically selected the clinical trials that evaluated the efficacy and safety of clopidogrel added proton pump inhibitors vs. clopidogrel in the treatment of patients with coronary heart disease after PCI. RevMan 5.0 software was used for quantitative data analyses.

15 randomized controlled trials including 50,366 patients were included. The meta-analysis results showed that compared with the clopidogrel added PPI group, the non-PPI group had significantly less risk of MACE[RR = 0.82,95%CI:0.77–0.88], myocardial infarction recurrence[RR = 0.72,95%CI:0.57–0.90], stent thrombosis[RR = 0.71,95%CI:0.56–0.92], Target vessel revascularization (TVR)[RR = 0.77,95%CI:0.63–0.93] and stroke [RR = 0.72,95%CI:0.67–0.76]. The risks of all cause death [RR = 1.14,95%CI:0.85–1.51], cardiovascular death [RR = 1.14, 95% CI: 0.85–1.52], bleedings events [RR = 1.60,95%CI:0.53–4.81] were similar in the two groups.

Conclusions

The patients in the non-PPI group were observed to be associated with less risk of MACE, myocardial infarction recurrence, stent thrombosis, target vessel revascularization (TVR) and stroke. And the two groups had similar all cause death, cardiovascular death, bleedings events.

New Approaches to Diagnosis and Treatment of Functional Dyspepsia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this article is to review the recent literature and discuss the new approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of functional dyspepsia (FD).

RECENT FINDINGS

According to the recent American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) and Canadian Association of Gastroenterology (CAG) guideline for dyspepsia, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication is recommended as a first treatment option, and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), tricyclic antidepressants, and prokinetics are listed as second-line therapy. On the other hand, in the Japanese guideline for FD, PPIs and prokinetics are recommended as the first-line treatment. In Japan, acotiamide, a recently launched prokinetic, showed significant efficacy in several clinical trials performed either in Japan or Europe. Regarding non-pharmacological treatment, recent topics include acupuncture, electrical stimulation, gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy, and meal and lifestyle modification. These treatments have provided significant efficacy, which provides some insights into the main pathophysiology of this disease. Although FD is common among functional gastrointestinal disorders, it is not easy to relieve the dyspeptic symptoms of FD patients. Combinations of pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment options are expected.

Proton Pump Inhibitor Use and Risk of Hip Fracture in Kidney Transplant Recipients

BACKGROUND

Posttransplantation bone disease is a significant problem, with few well-evidenced therapeutic options. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are associated with hip fracture in the general population and are widely prescribed for kidney transplant recipients.

STUDY DESIGN

A case-control study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

From the US Renal Data System, we identified from diagnoses and procedures 231 kidney transplant recipients with a first hip fracture. Cases were matched at the hip fracture index date with 15,575 controls on age, sex, race, and transplantation year.

PREDICTOR

PPI use.

OUTCOMES

First hip fracture.

RESULTS

In the year prior to the index date, a PPI was prescribed to 65.4% of cases and 57.4% of controls. Additionally, in 34.6% of cases and 28.9% of controls, a PPI was prescribed for >80% of the year preceding the index date (higher PPI users). Unadjusted ORs of hip fracture associated with any and higher PPI use were 1.55 (95% CI, 1.18-2.05) and 1.65 (95% CI, 1.2-2.27), respectively. When adjusted for baseline demographic, clinical, and pharmacologic covariables, any and higher PPI use remained associated with hip fracture, with ORs of 1.39 (95% CI, 1.04-1.84) and 1.41 (95% CI, 1.02-1.95), respectively.

LIMITATIONS

Potential residual confounding through either incorrectly ascertained or unavailable confounders; cohort limited to Medicare beneficiaries receiving low-income subsidy.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, PPI use was associated with hip fracture risk in the US kidney transplant population.

Impact of long-term gastric acid suppression on spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with advanced decompensated liver cirrhosis

OBJECTIVE

Recent studies have presented conflicting results on the association between gastric acid suppression and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP). The long-term effects of gastric acid suppression on SBP in cirrhotic patients remain unclear. This study evaluated the risk of SBP in advanced decompensated cirrhotic patients with long-term gastric acid suppression.

METHODS

Using the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, we identified 4788 patients with decompensated cirrhosis from 1998 to 2011. The SBP incidence rate was compared among proton pump inhibitor (PPI), H2-receptor antagonist (H2RA), and control cohorts. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regressions analysis was conducted to confirm the association between gastric acid suppression and SBP.

RESULTS

Totally, 4788 patients were analyzed: 1870 in the PPI cohort, 1728 in the H2RA cohort, and 1190 in the control cohort. The overall incidences of SBP were 16.8, 11.9, and 9.80 per 1000 person-years in the PPI, H2RA, and control cohorts, respectively. The adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) of SBP during the follow-up period was 1.16- (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.72-1.86) and 1.00-fold (95% CI, 0.63-1.57) higher in the PPI and H2RA cohorts, respectively, than in the control cohort; the result was non-significant. Compared with the control cohort, patients with >180days of PPI therapy had significantly higher risks of SBP, with an aHR of 2.28 (95% CI, 1.37-3.78).

CONCLUSIONS

Long-term PPI use is associated with a high risk of SBP in advanced decompensated cirrhotic patients. Well-designed prospective studies are necessary to evaluate the safety of long-term PPI use in such patients.

Prolonged utilization of proton pump inhibitors in patients with ischemic and valvular heart disease is associated with surgical treatments, weight loss and aggravates anemia

BACKGROUND

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the commonest drugs used nowadays. The aim of our study was to analyze prolonged utilization of proton pump inhibitors in medical therapy of patients with ischemic and valvular heart disease. Secondly, profile of utilization was scrutinized to patient characteristics and type of cardiovascular treatments.

METHODS

The study included consecutive patients scheduled for cardiovascular rehabilitation 2-6months after index cardiovascular treatment.

RESULTS

Two hundred ninety-four patients (n=294/604; 48.7%) have been using proton pump inhibitor in their therapy after index cardiovascular treatment. Cardiovascular treatments were powerfully connected with utilization of PPIs; surgery 5.77 (95%-confidence intervals [CI]: 4.05-8.22; p<0.001) and PCI 0.15 (CI: 0.10-0.22; p<0.001). The odds for having proton pump inhibitor in their chronic therapy were increased for atrial fibrillation 1.87 (CI: 1.08-3.23; p=0.025) and decreased for obesity 0.65 (CI: 0.45-0.96; p=0.035); surviving myocardial infarction 0.49 (CI: 0.29-0.83; p=0.035). Multinomial logistic regression controlled for existence of chronic renal disease found no significant association of renal dysfunction and PPI therapy. The existence of anemia was significantly increased in patients taking PPIs than controls; 6.00 (CI: 3.85-9.33; p<0.001). The use of PPI was also associated with worsening of metabolic profile, in part due to decreased utilization of ACE-inhibitors and statins. PPI consumption correlated with age of patients (Rho=0.216; p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

High proportion of cardiovascular, particularly surgical patients with ischemic and valvular heart disease utilized proton pump inhibitor in prolonged courses. Prolonged courses of PPIs were connected with existence and worsening of red blood count indexes, older age, lesser weight of patients and underutilization of cardioprotective drugs.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease with proton pump inhibitor use is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis: a nationwide population-based analysis

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. The risk of hip fracture is not increased in GERD patients with PPI use.

INTRODUCTION

The relationship between GERD with PPI treatment and the risk of osteoporosis is unclear. We aimed to determine the risk of developing osteoporosis in patients diagnosed with GERD.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GERD and received PPI treatment between 2000 and 2010 were identified from the Longitudinal Health Insurance Database as the study cohort (n = 10,620), which was frequency matched with the comparison cohort (n = 20,738) sampled from the general population according to age, sex, index year, and comorbidities. Both cohorts were followed until the end of 2011. The risk of osteoporosis was evaluated in both groups by using Cox proportional hazards regression models.

RESULTS

The GERD patients with PPI treatment had a greater incidence (31.4 vs 20.7 per 1000 person-year; crude hazard ratio [cHR] 1.51; 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.40-1.63) and a higher risk (adjusted HR [aHR] 1.50; 95 % CI 1.39-1.62) of osteoporosis than that of the comparison cohort. However, the overall incidence of hip fracture was not different between the GERD with PPI use and the control cohorts (aHR 0.79; 95 % CI 0.53-1.18).

CONCLUSION

GERD with PPI use is associated with an increased risk of osteoporosis. The findings of our study do not support an increased risk of hip fracture in GERD patients treated with a PPI.

Association of proton pump inhibitors with the occurrence of gut-derived bacteraemia in patients with haematological malignancy after chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Gut-derived bacteraemia is a major complication in patients with haematological malignancy after chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

Our study aimed to investigate the role of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in the occurrence of gut-derived bacteraemia.

METHODS

We compared data from 92 hospitalized haematological malignancy patients after chemotherapy with gut-derived bacteraemia, collected from January 2009 to July 2015, with those of 92 contemporaneous, hospitalized haematological malignancy patients without bacteraemia. We evaluated PPIs use and analysed the effects of covariates.

RESULTS

Patients with gut-derived bacteraemia had a significantly higher incidence of PPIs use (69.6%) than that of controls (47.8%). Of the patients with gut-derived bacteraemia, only 44.6% had a documented indication for PPIs therapy. The antibacterial prophylaxis rate was 38.0% in the bacteraemia group and 58.7% in the non-antibacterial group. Based on multivariable logistic regression analysis, only PPIs use (P = 0.00, odds ratio (OR) = 0.546) was found to be associated with the risk of bacteraemia whereas antibacterial prophylaxis (P = 0.00, OR = 0.652) was protective. There were no significant differences in demographics, malignancy status, length of neutropenia, complications, or steroid use between the gut-derived bacteraemia and control group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests a potential association between PPIs use and development of gut-derived bacteraemia in haematological malignancy patients after chemotherapy.