The Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitor in Cirrhotics with Variceal Bleeding: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) was widely used in cirrhotic patients with variceal bleeding empirically rather than evidence-based practice. We aimed to evaluate the plausible indication of PPI use in variceal bleeding cirrhotic patients and figure out whether it can decrease the re-bleeding rate after endoscopic therapy. Furthermore, we also investigated the association between PPI and bleeding-related mortality in these patients.

METHODS

We have searched in PubMed, Medline, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Cochrane and Embase prior to May 2019. Pooled OR and 95% CI were calculated by random-effects model.

RESULTS

A total of 11 original articles including 1,818 cirrhotic patients were analyzed. The overall meta-analysis highlighted that PPI use may decrease the re-bleeding rate after endoscopic therapy (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.35-0.77). The conclusion was irrespective of study methods, endoscopic purpose and hemorrhage sites. However, the conclusion speculated that PPI should be prescribed >1 month. Meanwhile, PPI use may not impact the bleeding-related mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

PPI, used for >1 month, can decrease re-bleeding rate after endoscopic therapy in cirrhotic patients for prophylaxis or emergency treatment purpose. No matter how long it takes, PPI use is not associated with bleeding-related mortality.

Meta-analysis shows similar re-bleeding rates among Western and Eastern populations after index video capsule endoscopy

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is the first-line diagnostic procedure for investigating obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). Different re-bleeding rates following index VCE have been reported among Western and Eastern studies.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature search to identify studies examining re-bleeding rates after VCE for OGIB. Meta-analysis assessed the pooled proportion of re-bleeding events after VCE for OGIB according to study's origin (Western vs. Eastern) and according to the length of follow-up (≥24 months vs. <24 months). We also calculated the re-bleeding odds ratios (OR; 95% CI) after positive vs. negative index VCE, overt vs. occult initial presentation of bleeding and after interventional treatment for positive index cases, according to the study's origin.

RESULTS

We included 46 (30 Western and 16 Eastern) studies with 5796 patients. Significant heterogeneity was detected among meta-analyzed studies. Overall, the pooled re-bleeding rate was similar between Western (29%; 95% CI: 23-34) and Eastern (21%; 95% CI: 15-27) populations, irrespective of the length of follow-up. The odds of re-bleeding was significantly higher after positive as compared to negative index VCE in Eastern studies (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.07-2.94). Application of specific treatment after positive index VCE was associated with lower re-bleeding odds in both Western (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.16-0.87) and Eastern (OR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.21-0.72) populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing VCE for OGIB have similar re-bleeding rates in the East and the West, regardless of the length of follow-up. However, increased re-bleeding odds after positive index VCE is observed in Eastern studies.