Optimizing the CAR T-Cell Therapy Experience in Multiple Myeloma: Clinical Pearls From an Expert Roundtable

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapies offer substantial advancement in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). However, the CAR-T therapy process involves complex decision-making that is informed by many variables. This review aims to provide an overview of the patient selection and administration process for CAR-T therapy for MM from the perspective of experienced healthcare providers (HCPs), including considerations for each step in the CAR-T therapy process. Referring HCPs should initiate conversations with HCPs at CAR-T capable centers earlier in the treatment journey, even before patients are eligible for CAR-T therapy, particularly for patients from underserved populations and patients with high-risk disease, to ensure adequate time for logistical planning and patient education. Patient selection for CAR-T therapy may be guided by factors such as performance status, rate of disease progression, and logistical considerations. Some anticancer therapies may affect T-cell fitness and therefore impact CAR-T manufacturing and patient outcomes; however, additional research is needed to confirm this in MM. Bridging therapies should be tailored to the needs of the patient and ideally halted 1 week or longer before CAR-T infusion, contingent upon the agent(s) used. Lymphodepletion regimens may need to be modified for patients with renal insufficiency. Collaboration with HCPs at both the treating and referring centers is important to optimize coordinated care of patients. Collaboration with and guidance from experienced HCPs throughout patient selection, referral, and CAR-T administration is instrumental in optimizing patient outcomes as access to CAR-T therapies expands.

Idecabtagene Vicleucel Is Well Tolerated and Effective in Relapsed/Refractory Myeloma Patients with Prior Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation

BCMA-specific chimeric-antigen receptor (CAR-) T cell therapy has led to high response rates and durable remissions in patients with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma. However, little data are available for patients after prior allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in whom T cells are chimeric. In this study, we aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of patient-derived donor CAR-T therapy in myeloma patients with prior allo-SCT, particularly with regard to graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). We report a comprehensive clinical analysis of 3 patients who had previously undergone allo-SCT for high-risk myeloma and were treated with idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) at our institution. Ide-cel was well tolerated, with no clinically relevant immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome or cytokine release syndrome observed in any patient. Importantly, no new GVHD was observed, even though all patients had a history of GVHD. All patients responded to treatment with at least a very good partial remission. Two patients relapsed within 6 months, and 1 patient was still in stringent complete remission at the time of this report. Our findings demonstrate that treatment with ide-cel is feasible, very well tolerated, and effective in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after prior allo-SCT.

Patient perspectives on symptoms, health-related quality of life, and treatment experience associated with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma

Purpose

This study aimed to better understand the patient perspective and treatment experience of relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Methods

This qualitative study enrolled adult RRMM patients from 6 US clinics who had ≥ 3 months of life expectancy, ≤ 6 prior lines of therapy, and ≥ 1 treatment regimen with a proteasome inhibitor and immunomodulator, or a CD38 monoclonal antibody or an alkylating agent, and a steroid. In-person semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted to capture concepts that were relevant and important to patients. Topics included RRMM symptoms and impacts and the mode of administration, frequency, duration, convenience, side effects, and overall experience with RRMM treatment.

Results

A total of 22 patients completed interviews. At enrollment, 59.1% of participants were using regimens containing dexamethasone, 36.4% daratumumab, 27.3% carfilzomib, and 18.2% lenalidomide. More participants had experience using intravenous or injectable therapy alone (40.9%) than oral therapy alone (18.2%). Back pain and fatigue were the most frequently reported symptoms (40.9% each); 27.3% reported no symptoms. Most participants reported physical function limitations (86.4%), emotional impacts (77.3%), MM-related activity limitations (72.7%), and sleep disturbances (63.6%). Most participants perceived treatment effectiveness based on physician-explained clinical signs (68.2%) and symptom relief (40.9%). Participants experienced gastrointestinal adverse events (59.1%), fatigue (59.1%), sleep disturbances (31.8%), and allergic reactions (31.8%) with treatment. Key elements of treatment burden included the duration of a typical treatment day (68.2%), treatment interfering with daily activities (54.5%), and infusion duration (50.0%).

Conclusions

These results provide treatment experience–related data to further understand RRMM treatment burden and better inform treatment decision-making.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00520-022-06979-7.

Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab in Asian patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: post hoc subgroup analysis of the phase 3 CANDOR trial

BACKGROUND

Due to increasing use of frontline lenalidomide, effective and safe lenalidomide-free therapies for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) are needed in Asia. This subgroup analysis of phase 3 CANDOR study evaluated efficacy and safety of KdD vs Kd in Asian patients with RRMM.

METHODS

Self-identified Asian patients with RRMM (KdD = 46; Kd = 20) with 1‒3 prior therapies were included. The primary endpoint of progression-free survival was estimated by stratified Cox regression.

RESULTS

Baseline demographics and patient characteristics were balanced in both arms. KdD reduced the risk of progression or death by 25% vs Kd [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.75; 95% CI 0.259, 2.168] in the Asian subgroup, compared with 37% vs Kd (0.63; 0.464, 0.854) in the overall CANDOR population. Percentage of patients who reported grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the KdD and Kd arms was 95.7 and 90.0%, respectively. Serious AEs were observed in 58.7 and 40.0% of patients in the KdD and Kd arms, respectively. There were two (4.3%) fatal TEAEs in the KdD arm due to infections.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a trend toward better efficacy and a favorable benefit-risk profile for KdD vs Kd in Asian patients with RRMM. Cautious interpretation is warranted due to small patient size.

Real-world comparative effectiveness of triplets containing bortezomib (B), carfilzomib (C), daratumumab (D), or ixazomib (I) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the US

Multiple available combinations of proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulators (IMIDs), and monoclonal antibodies are shifting the relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) treatment landscape. Lack of head-to-head trials of triplet regimens highlights the need for real-world (RW) evidence. We conducted an RW comparative effectiveness analysis of bortezomib (V), carfilzomib (K), ixazomib (I), and daratumumab (D) combined with either lenalidomide or pomalidomide plus dexamethasone (Rd or Pd) in RRMM. A retrospective cohort of patients initiating triplet regimens in line of therapy (LOT) ≥ 2 on/after 1/1/2014 was followed between 1/2007 and 3/2018 in Optum's deidentified US electronic health records database. Time to next treatment (TTNT) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods; regimens were compared using covariate-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models. Seven hundred forty-one patients (820 patient LOTs) with an Rd backbone (VRd, n = 349; KRd, n = 218; DRd, n = 99; IRd, n = 154) and 348 patients (392 patient LOTs) with a Pd backbone (VPd, n = 52; KPd, n = 146; DPd, n = 149; IPd, n = 45) in LOTs ≥2 were identified. More patients ≥75 years received IRd (39.6%), IPd (37.8%), and VRd (36.7%) than other triplets. More patients receiving VRd/VPd were in LOT2 vs other triplets. Unadjusted median TTNT in LOT ≥ 2: VRd, 13.9; KRd, 8.7; IRd, 11.4; DRd, not estimable (NE); and VPd, 12.0; KPd, 6.7; IPd, 9.5 months; DPd, NE. In covariate-adjusted analysis, only KRd vs DRd was associated with a significantly higher risk of next LOT initiation/death (HR 1.72; P = 0.0142); no Pd triplet was significantly different vs DPd in LOT ≥ 2. Our data highlight important efficacy/effectiveness gaps between results observed in phase 3 clinical trials and those realized in the RW.

KRD (carfilzomib and lenalidomide plus dexamethasone) for the treatment of relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma in the real-life: a retrospective survey in 123 patients

From April 2016, carfilzomib, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (KRD), became available for use in the daily practice in Italy for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We performed a retrospective survey at 14 different institutions from Southern Italy in order to evaluate patient characteristics and treatment results from an unselected series of patients treated accordingly so far. One hundred and twenty-three consecutive patients were included, with a median of 2 previous lines of therapy (range 1-9) and a median age of 63 years (range 39-82). At the time of analysis, median number of courses administered is 11 (range 1-34), and all patients are evaluable for response. Overall response rate including complete remission, very good partial remission, and partial remission is 85%. After a median follow-up of 27 months, median overall and progression-free survival are 33 and 23 months, respectively. Sixty-three patients are alive and between them, 45 (37%) are in continuous remission. Sixty patients have died (49%), mainly from progressive disease. There were 6 treatment-related deaths (5% of the whole patient population). Overall, hematological and non-hematological toxicity were manageable, mostly on outpatient basis. Arterial hypertension has been observed in 43 cases (35%) but did not lead to treatment interruption. Our data demonstrate that in real life, KRD is highly effective and well tolerated in the majority of patients with RRMM.