Hybrid approach in sacral sore management with maggot debridement therapy and flap reconstruction

Sacral sore is a common problem in patients with spinal cord injury. It leads to prolonged hospitalization and recurrent infections which might require repeated surgery to treat. Flap reconstruction allows soft tissue coverage of sacral sore under the premise of infection-free wound base. Maggot debridement therapy (MDT) has been described as an alternative non-surgical management as opposed to the traditional surgical debridement in case of infected sore, reducing number of surgeries under anaesthesia. However, MDT and surgery are not mutually exclusive. In this article we describe a hybrid approach combining MDT and flap reconstruction with multi-disciplinary effort in management of sacral sore, which accelerates wound healing and prevents morbidities, while lowering the risks associated with repeated surgical debridement at the same time.

Perforator-based island flap with a peripheral muscle patch for coverage of sacral sores

Despite numerous therapeutic advances, the treatment of pressure sores remains a challenge. The increased use of perforator flaps enables surgeons to minimize donor-site morbidity by sparing the underlying muscle. In the presence of focal deep spaces, however, the inclusion of muscle would be beneficial. The goal of this study was to introduce a method for including a muscle patch at the periphery of a perforator-based island flap for coverage of sacral pressure sores. Between March 2010 and February 2015, 26 patients with stage IV sacral sores underwent perforator-based island flap reconstruction with a peripheral muscle patch. Patient characteristics, including sex, age, defect size, and postoperative complications, were recorded. All flaps survived without major complications. No flap necrosis was noted. The present study shows that a muscle patch incorporated into the periphery of a perforator-based flap can be transferred safely. This can be a good surgical option in cases where infection control or more volume is needed.

Modification of the superior gluteal artery perforator flap for reconstruction of sacral sores

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in reconstruction techniques, the treatment of sacral sores remains challenging to plastic surgeons. The superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap is reliable and preserves the entire contralateral side as a future donor site. The ipsilateral gluteal muscle is preserved, and the inferior gluteal artery flaps are viable. However, dissection of the perforator is tedious and may compromise the perforator vessels.

METHODS

Between April 2003 and March 2013, we performed two modified flap-harvesting techniques: a rotational and a tunnel method, with only a short pedicle dissection to cover 30 sacral defects. Patient characteristics including sex, age, cause of sacral defect, flap size, perforator number, use and postoperative complications were recorded.

RESULTS

All flaps survived except two, which developed partial flap necrosis and were finally treated by contralateral V-Y advancement flap coverage. The mean follow-up period was 14.8 months (range, 3-24 months). No flap surgery-related mortality or recurrence of sacral pressure sores or infected pilonidal cysts were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Perforator-based flaps have become popular in modern reconstructive surgery because of low donor-site morbidity and good preservation of muscle. The advantages of our modification procedure include shorter operative time, lesser bleeding and lesser pedicle trauma, which make the SGAP flaps an excellent choice for sacral sore coverage.