1
|
Gjorup CA, Woodford R, Li I, Carlino MS, Ch'ng S, Chung D, Hsiao E, Lo SN, London K, Long GV, Menzies AM, Nieweg OE, Pennington TE, Rtshiladze MA, Saw RPM, Scolyer RA, Shannon KF, Spillane AJ, Stretch JR, Thompson JF, Varey AHR, van Akkooi ACJ. Role of Concurrent Ultrasound Surveillance of Sentinel Node-Positive Node Fields in Melanoma Patients Having Routine Cross-Sectional Imaging. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1857-1864. [PMID: 37966706 PMCID: PMC10838221 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14526-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In sentinel node-positive (SN+ve) melanoma patients, active surveillance with regular ultrasound examination of the node field has become standard, rather than completion lymph node dissection (CLND). A proportion of these patients now receive adjuvant systemic therapy and have routine cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography [CT] or positron emission tomography [PET]/CT). The role of concurrent ultrasound (US) surveillance in these patients is unclear. The purpose of our study was to describe the modality of detection of nodal recurrence in SN+ve node fields. METHODS SN+ve melanoma patients who did not undergo CLND treated at a single institution from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2020 were included. RESULTS A total of 225 SN+ve patients with a median follow-up of 23 months were included. Of these, 119 (53%) received adjuvant systemic therapy. Eighty (36%) developed a recurrence at any site; 24 (11%) recurred first in the SN+ve field, of which 12 (5%) were confirmed node field recurrence only at 2 months follow-up. The nodal recurrences were first detected by ultrasound in seven (3%), CT in seven (3%), and PET/CT in seven (3%) patients. All nodal recurrences evident on US were also evident on PET/CT and vice versa. CONCLUSIONS The high rate of recurrences outside the node field and the identification of all US-detected nodal recurrences on concurrent cross-sectional imaging modalities suggest that routine concurrent ultrasound surveillance of the node-positive field may be unnecessary for SN+ve melanoma patients having routine cross-sectional imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline A Gjorup
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rachel Woodford
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Isabel Li
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Matteo S Carlino
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, Australia
| | - Sydney Ch'ng
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Head and Neck Service, Camperdown, Australia
| | - David Chung
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Newtown, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Edward Hsiao
- Mater Imaging, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Serigne N Lo
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kevin London
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, Newtown, Australia
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, Australia
| | - Georgina V Long
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander M Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Thomas E Pennington
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Michael A Rtshiladze
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Robyn P M Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Richard A Scolyer
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Charles Perkin Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Tissue Pathology and Diagnostic Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- NSW Health Pathology, Sydney, Australia
| | - Kerwin F Shannon
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Chris O'Brien Lifehouse Cancer Centre, Head and Neck Service, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| | - Andrew J Spillane
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
- Breast and Melanoma Surgery Unit, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, Australia
| | - Jonathan R Stretch
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia
| | - Alexander H R Varey
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, Australia
| | - Alexander C J van Akkooi
- Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mulder EEAP, Verver D, van der Klok T, de Wijs CJ, van den Bosch TPP, De Herdt MJ, van der Steen B, Verhoef C, van der Veldt AAM, Grünhagen DJ, Koljenovic S. Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) immunoreactivity in positive sentinel nodes from patients with melanoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2022; 58:151909. [PMID: 35151198 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2022.151909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Patients with cutaneous melanoma and a positive sentinel node (SN) are currently eligible for adjuvant treatment with targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Near-infrared (NIR) fluorescence imaging could be an alternative and less invasive tool for SN biopsy to select patients for adjuvant treatment. One potential target for NIR is the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET). This study aimed to assess MET immunoreactivity in positive SNs and to evaluate its potential diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic value. METHODS In this retrospective study, positive SN samples from patients with primary cutaneous melanoma were collected to assess MET immunoreactivity. To this end, paraffin-embedded SNs were stained for MET (monoclonal antibody D1C2). A 4-point Histoscore was used to determine cytoplasmic and membranous immunoreactivity (0 negative/1 weak/2 moderate/3 strong). Samples were considered positive when ≥10% of the cancer cells showed MET expression (staining intensity ≥1). Patient and clinicopathological characteristics were used for descriptive statistics, binary logistic regression, and survival analyses. RESULTS Positive MET immunohistochemistry was observed in 24 out of 37 samples (65%). No statistically significant associations were found between MET positivity and the following prognostic factors: Breslow thickness (P = 0.961), ulceration (P = 1.000), and SN tumor burden (P = 0.792). According to MET positivity, Kaplan-Meier curves showed no significant differences in survival. CONCLUSION This exploratory study found no evidence to support MET immunoreactivity in positive SNs as a possible diagnostic or prognostic indicator in patients with melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evalyn E A P Mulder
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Daniëlle Verver
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Calvin J de Wijs
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | | - Maria J De Herdt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Berdine van der Steen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Meerwein CM, Sekine T, Veit-Haibach P, Bredell MG, Huber GF, Huellner MW. Multi-slice SPECT/CT vs. lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma ray probe for sentinel node mapping in HNSCC. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2016; 274:1633-1642. [PMID: 27837418 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-016-4379-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2016] [Accepted: 11/08/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
To assess the diagnostic potential of multi-slice single-photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT) for preoperative sentinel node (SN) mapping in early stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Retrospective case-control study including data of consecutive HNSCC patients treated between November 2011 and December 2015. The diagnostic accuracy of multi-slice SPECT/CT was assessed with regard to the gold standard intraoperative gamma ray detection probe, using McNemar's test and calculating the area under the ROC curve. Additionally, the hot spot yield of SPECT/CT and planar lymphoscintigraphy (LS) was compared. Compared to the intraoperative gold standard, SPECT/CT showed an overall positive predictive value of 60.3% [confidence interval (CI) 46.6-73.0%)], a negative predictive value of 96.3% (CI 93.6-98.1%), and an accuracy of 90.8% (CI 89.1-92.4%). SPECT/CT detected more hot spots than LS and provided detailed anatomical information as well as relevant additional findings with potential impact on further patient management. Sentinel lymph node biopsy proved to be a reliable and safe procedure with an excellent SN excision rate (97%). Multi-slice SPECT/CT is a highly accurate diagnostic test and matches the gold standard intraoperative gamma ray detection probe.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M Meerwein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. .,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. .,Division of Otorhinolaryngology, Frauenklinikstrasse 24, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - T Sekine
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Radiology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - P Veit-Haibach
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M G Bredell
- Department of Craniomaxillo-Facial Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - G F Huber
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - M W Huellner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|