Seroprevalence of varicella-zoster virus antibody and immunogenicity of live attenuated varicella vaccine in healthcare workers in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Healthcare workers (HCWs) without evidence of immunity to varicella-zoster virus (VZV) are recommended to undergo varicella vaccination. Immunogenicity of live attenuated varicella vaccine has rarely been investigated among HCWs in Taiwan.

METHODS

Anti-VZV immunoglobulin G (IgG) titer was checked for all HCWs at Changhua Christian Hospital from 2011 to 2017. One-dose and two-dose (separated by 4-8 weeks) vaccines were administered to HCWs with equivocal and negative anti-varicella IgG results, respectively. Follow-up anti-VZV IgG was determined at least 4 weeks after completion of vaccination. Factors associated with seroconversion to varicella vaccination were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 2406 included HCWs, the anti-VZV IgG serostatus was tested positive, equivocal and negative in 1924 (79.9%), 117 (4.9%) and 365 (15.2%), respectively. The seroprevalence had decreased from 88.0% (235/267) in 2011 to 72.2% (270/374) in 2017 (p for trend <0.05). A total of 67.8% (327/482) HCWs completed scheduled vaccination and serological follow-up. The seroconversion rates for HCWs with baseline equivocal and negative anti-VZV IgG results were 100% (80/80) and 79.4% (196/247) after one- and two-dose vaccination, respectively. In multivariate analysis, obesity (adjusted odds ratio, 0.308; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.94, p = 0.039) was the only factor statistically significantly associated with seroconversion to vaccination.

CONCLUSION

Decreasing trends of seroprevalence of VZV were observed among HCWs from 2011 to 2017. HCWs who were obese were less likely to respond to varicella vaccination.

Serostatus cutoff levels and fold increase to define seroresponse to recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus - Zaire Ebola virus envelope glycoprotein vaccine: An evidence-based analysis

The recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus - Zaire Ebola virus envelope glycoprotein (rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP) vaccine is a live recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) where the VSV G protein is replaced with ZEBOV-GP. To better understand the immune response after receiving the rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP vaccine, the current analyses evaluated different definitions of seroresponse that differentiate vaccine and placebo recipients enrolled in a placebo-controlled clinical trial (PREVAIL; NCT02344407) in which a subset of the study participants had elevated baseline titers. Alternative values for serostatus cutoff (SSCO; 200-500 EU/mL) and/or fold rise (two- to five-fold) were applied to compare their ability to distinguish between participants receiving rVSVΔG-ZEBOV-GP or placebo. The results indicate that an SSCO of 200 EU/mL can be used to define seropositivity at baseline (i.e. pre-vaccination). The use of dual criteria of the same SSCO (200 EU/mL) together with a two-fold rise in antibody level from baseline provided the definition of seroresponse that maximized the statistical significance between vaccine recipients and placebo recipients post-vaccination. Clinical trial registration: NCT02344407.

Live attenuated tetravalent (G1-G4) bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine (BRV-TV): Randomized, controlled phase III study in Indian infants

BACKGROUND

Rotavirus remains the leading cause of diarrhoea among children <5years. We assessed immunogenic non-inferiority of a tetravalent bovine-human reassortant rotavirus vaccine (BRV-TV) over the licensed human-bovine pentavalent rotavirus vaccine RV5.

METHODS

Phase III single-blind study (parents blinded) in healthy infants randomized (1:1) to receive three doses of BRV-TV or RV5 at 6-8, 10-12, and 14-16weeks of age. All concomitantly received a licensed diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, Haemophilus influenzae type b conjugate vaccine (DTwP-HepB-Hib) and oral polio vaccine (OPV). Immunogenic non-inferiority was evaluated in terms of the inter-group difference in anti-rotavirus serum IgA seroresponse (primary endpoint), and seroprotection/seroresponse rates to DTwP-HepB-Hib and OPV vaccines. Seroresponse was defined as a ≥4-fold increase in titers from baseline to D28 post-dose 3. Non-inferiority was declared if the difference between groups (based on the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval [CI]) was above -10%. Each subject was evaluated for solicited adverse events 7days and unsolicited & serious adverse events 28days following each dose of vaccination.

RESULTS

Of 1195 infants screened, 1182 were randomized (590 to BRV-TV; 592 to RV5). Non-inferiority for rotavirus serum IgA seroresponse was not established: BRV-TV, 47.1% (95%CI: 42.8; 51.5) versus RV5, 61.2% (95%CI: 56.8; 65.5); difference between groups, -14.08% (95%CI: -20.4; -7.98). Serum IgA geometric mean concentrations at D28 post-dose 3 were 28.4 and 50.1U/ml in BRV-TV and RV5 groups, respectively. For all DTwP-HepB-Hib and OPV antigens, seroprotection/seroresponse was elicited in both groups and the -10% non-inferiority criterion between groups was met. There were 16 serious adverse events, 10 in BRV-TV group and 6 in RV5 group; none were classified as vaccine related. Both groups had similar vaccine safety profiles.

CONCLUSION

BRV-TV was immunogenic but did not meet immunogenic non-inferiority criteria to RV5 when administered concomitantly with routine pediatric antigens in infants.