Clinical applications of skin traction technique with adjustable tension in treatment of large area skin defects

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical applications of the adjustable skin traction technique in the treatment of large area skin defects.

RESEARCH DESIGN

A prospective study.

BACKGROUND

The skin is the largest organ of the human body and skin tissue exposed to external environment which makes it vulnerable to damage. There are many reasons for skin defects such as trauma, infection, burns, scars, tumors resection, inflammation, pigmented nevus, etc. Skin traction is the application of pulling force to the trunk or extremities for immobilization, fracture reduction and deformity correction. This technique accurately controls skin expansion which is safe, convenient and accelerates wound healing.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on 80 patients suffered from large area skin defects in the department of orthopedics, the first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou University from September 2019 to January 2023. There were 40 patients in the experimental group who underwent skin traction. In contrast, 40 people in the control group underwent skin flaps or skin grafts without skin traction. The inclusion criteria include large area skin defects, normal peripheral skin & blood supply, normal vital organs, no severe coagulation dysfunction etc. Male & female with and without skin traction are 22 & 18 and 25 & 15 respectively. The skin traction device used was a hook and single rod type. The skin defect area was approximately 15 cm × 9-43 cm × 10 cm.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, the experimental group with traction showed 2 cases of skin infection, 1 case of skin necrosis and 3 cases of inflammation recurrence. In contrast, the control group without traction showed 8 cases of skin infection, 6 cases of skin necrosis and 10 cases of inflammation recurrence. Skin infection (P = 0.04), skin necrosis (P = 0.02) and inflammatory response (P = 0.03) represented significant differences between two groups. There was also a significant difference in hospitalization costs (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Skin traction has huge clinical applications including a shorter hospital stay, faster wound healing, lower hospitalization cost, high satisfaction rate, and a fair skin appearance after surgery. It is an effective method of treating skin and musculoskeletal defects.

What are the effects, advantages and disadvantages? A scoping review

BACKGROUND

Hip surgery is normally the chosen therapy for proximal femur fractures. Surgery within 24-48 h after hip fracture is recommended, but surgery may not always be performed promptly. Consequently, skin-traction is applied to reduce complications. The purpose of this review is to assess both advantages and disadvantages of skin traction.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted. The research question was: which are the effects of skin traction, its advantages and disadvantages in adult patients with proximal femur fractures hospitalised in orthopaedic wards? The search was done in the databases PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, DOAJ, ClinicalTrials.gov and OpenDissertation.

RESULTS

9 records were included, skin traction effects were summarised in 7 categories: pain, pressure sores, comfort and relaxation, thromboembolism, damage from adhesive, complications and quality of care. The possible advantage is pain reduction between 24 and 60 h, the possible disadvantage is skin damage.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

The routine use of skin traction does not appear recommended, but more consistent evidence is necessary to make clinic decisions. Future RCTs could focus on the effects of skin traction 24-60 h after hospitalisation and before surgery.

Suitability of skin traction combined with braces for treating femoral shaft fractures in 3-5 years old children

BACKGROUND

In children aged 3-5 years, femoral fractures are common and are frequently treated using flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) or spica casting. Recently, more surgeons have been relying on FIN surgery because of the high rate of complications associated with spica casts, such as skin irritation and re-adjustment surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of skin traction combined with braces in 3-5 years old children at our hospital.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 125 children aged 3-5 years with femoral shaft fractures treated at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. We assigned 68 patients who underwent FIN surgery to Group A and 57 patients treated with skin traction and braces to Group B. Comparative analysis included the children's age, sex, side of the affected limb, cause of fracture, function of the knee joint, healing time of the fracture, duration of hospitalization, cost of hospitalization, and complications. The complications evaluated included joint dysfunction, pain, infection, pressure ulcers, angular deformities, limb length differences, re-fractures, nonunion fractures, and delayed union.

RESULTS

There were significant differences in and hospital costs (p = 0.001). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were observed in sex (p = 0.858), injury type (p = 0.804), age (p = 0.231), hospitalization time (p = 0.071), bone healing time (p = 0.212), and complications. Pressure ulcers, nonunion fractures, and delayed union did not occur in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Both methods had similar therapeutic effects and postoperative complications in children aged 3-5 years with femoral shaft fractures. Therefore, skin traction combined with braces is recommended for this population and for patients hospitalized in institutions where several beds are available, with a consequent possibility of prolonged hospitalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

The effect of skin traction on pain relief in patients with isolated intertrochanteric fractures, a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Hip fractures are common in elderly patients. The surgery is usually delayed due to underlying conditions, and pain control is crucial while the patient is cleared for surgery. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT) study, we hypothesized that the application of skin traction in patients with intertrochanteric fracture does not significantly change the Visual Analogue Score (VAS) of pain.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single institution, parallel randomized controlled trial. Two hundred and twenty-nine patients with isolated intertrochanteric fractures were enrolled in the study. Patients with neurologic issues, drug addiction, scars or swelling, or vascular issues at the site of skin traction application were excluded from the study. Patients were divided into two groups: group A included 97 patients, and group B included 95 patients. Skin traction was applied for group A, while only a soft pillow was put beneath the patients' knees in the other group. The VAS score was measured after the diagnosis, two hours before the operation, and 24 h after the surgery. The morphine dosage administered per day was documented for both groups.

RESULTS

After excluding patients with postoperative delirium, 154 patients (55 males and 99 females) with isolated intertrochanteric fractures (69 right-sided and 85 left-sided), and a mean age of 70 ± 10 remained in the study. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding age, gender, and mean time from injury to admission (P > .05). The mean VAS score measures and morphine dosage administered per day were not significantly different between the two groups (P > .05). Both groups experienced significant pain relief 24 h postoperatively (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Pre-operative skin traction application affected neither the patients' VAS scores nor the mean morphine dosage per day in patients with isolated intertrochanteric fractures. Our data does not support the routine application of pre-operative skin traction in patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The project was registered in the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (registration reference: IRCT20180729040636N3, registration date: 01/07/2020).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1

Results after skin traction for femur shaft fractures in children below the age of four years

Purpose

Nonsurgical management has been identified as the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures in children below four years of age. For various reasons, the surgical approach has become increasingly popular in recent years. The aim of this study is to report results after vertical skin traction and analyze the benefits of this technique as well as to point out advantages compared with surgery in this age group.

Methods

The authors performed a retrospective data analysis, including all patients with femoral shaft fractures below the age of four who were treated with vertical skin traction at our institution between January 2006 and December 2016.

Results

Skin traction for a femoral shaft fracture was performed for 36 patients (mean age 1.6 years; 1 day–3.5 years). The mean duration of traction was 18.5 days (14–30). Complications included soft tissue affections (n = 5), which all healed spontaneously. Consolidation was observed in all fractures. Initial axial deviations and shortening did not change during traction until consolidation (p > 0.05), and no relevant torsion deformity occurred (p = 0.01). Patients gained full weight-bearing within 12.3 days (7–40) following end of traction. At the final follow-up, after a mean of 29.3 months (12–192), leg-length discrepancy (mean 7.1 mm; 5–20) was found on radiograms in nine cases, and axial deviations (mean 7.7°; 5–25) were documented in seven cases. None of the patients had limitations in daily activities or sports.

Conclusion

Skin traction is a technically easy, safe, and non-invasive treatment modality for femoral shaft fractures in children below the age of four years. Strong results are obtained benefited from a high potential of growth-related correction, and in principle no anesthesia is needed. A prolonged hospitalization and socio-economic factors maintain the ongoing debate in comparison with the surgical approach.

Level of evidence

Level III, retrospective.

Pain relief differentiated according to the length of time that preoperative skin traction was carried out for hip fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis pertaining to pain relief differentiated by time within 24 h of preoperative skin traction for hip fracture.

METHOD

PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE were searched for relevant articles published in the English language on comparison of pain relief between preoperative skin traction and no traction for hip fracture.

RESULTS

Five studies involving 413 patients with hip fractures (skin traction, n = 207; no traction, n = 206) were included. The visual analog scale (VAS) score within 1 h postadmission in the skin traction group was significantly smaller than that in the no traction group. In contrast, there was no significant difference in the VAS scores of the two groups at 4-6 h postadmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence indicates that preoperative skin traction for hip fracture can provide pain relief within 1 h postadmission, but not at 4-6, 12, and 24 h postadmission. Accordingly, alternative preoperative pain relief methods for hip fractures should be carefully considered.

The effectiveness of skin traction in reducing pain in adults with a hip fracture: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Femoral fractures are associated with high mortality and morbidity, including pain. Skin traction may be used pre-operatively as an adjunct to analgesia to decrease pain.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects on pain of the use of pre-operative skin traction in adults with a fracture of the proximal femur.

RESEARCH QUESTION

Is the use of pre-operative skin traction effective in reducing pain in adults with proximal femoral fractures?

METHOD

A systematic review was conducted based on a search of PubMed, CINAHL Complete, MEDLINE Complete, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. The keywords 'preoperative', 'skin traction', 'hip fractures' and 'pain' were used. Randomised controlled trials published in English between April 2011 and November 2020 were included and appraised using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.

RESULTS

Five articles met the inclusion criteria; all were randomised controlled trials. The results confirm those of earlier reviews: skin traction does not significantly decrease pain and analgesia use. The quality of the evidence available is weak.

CONCLUSION

There is no strong evidence for the routine pre-operative use of skin traction in adults with a hip fracture. As the quality of the evidence is weak, further high-quality research on this topic is warranted.

A comparative evaluation of the efficacy between skeletal traction and skin traction in pre-operative management of femur shaft fractures in Korle Bu Teaching Hospital

OBJECTIVES

This study is to compare the outcomes of pre-operative skeletal and skin traction in adult femoral shaft fractures awaiting surgical fixation within two weeks of presentation to the Accident Center of Korle Bu Teaching Hospital.

METHODS

This study was a clinical trial on 86 recruited patients with closed femoral shaft fractures sustained within 24 hours of presentation grouped into 2 groups. Descriptive and inferential statistics comprising frequency, percentage, Chi-square, independent sample t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used in analysing the data.

RESULTS

Of the total number of patients involved in the study, 74% (n=64) were males and 26% (n=22) were females with a mean age of 39.49 (SD ±15). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain assessment between the Skin traction group and Trans-tibia skeletal traction group after traction. With regards to complications, the difference between the Skin traction group and the Skeletal traction group was statistically significant (P=0.001). Moreover, the mean blood loss compared with the open type of reduction in the Transtibia skeletal traction group was significantly less than the Skin traction group (p=0.000).

CONCLUSION

This study has shown that both Skeletal traction and Skin traction were equally effective in controlling pre-operative pain in adult patients with femoral shaft fractures and does not affect intra-operative blood loss and post-operative management. Therefore, pre-operative Skin traction can be considered a useful and cost-effective method of maintaining alignment and pain relief in adult femoral shaft fractures.

FUNDING

Personal Funding.

Pain relief after more than 24 hours of preoperative skin traction in patients with intertrochanteric fractures: A retrospective comparative cohort study

AIM

The primary aim of the study was to investigate pain relief after more than 24 h of preoperative skin traction (because of delay in surgery due to comorbidities and system issues) in patients with intertrochanteric fractures.

METHOD

We performed a retrospective comparative cohort study of 56 patients who underwent intramedullary nailing for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures and who had waited for surgery for more than 48 h after admission due to comorbidities or system issues. Preoperative therapy was randomly selected with a ratio of one to two and patients classified as skin traction (n = 18) or no traction (n = 38). The Verbal Rating Scale (VRS) was used to assess pain at 12-60 h post-admission.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in VRS at 12 h after admission (1.1 ± 1.0 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9, p = 0.73), but patients who received skin traction had a lower VRS pain score at 24-60 h after admission compared to those with no traction (24 h, 0.4 ± 0.8 vs. 1.1 ± 1.0, p < 0.05; 36 h, 0.2 ± 0.5 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9, p < 0.05; 48 h, 0.2 ± 0.4 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9, p < 0.05; 60 h, 0.2 ± 0.4 vs. 0.9 ± 0.9, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Skin traction for patients with intertrochanteric fractures for more than 24 h preoperatively resulted in a lower VRS pain score. Therefore, more than 24 h of preoperative skin traction for patients with intertrochanteric fractures may give effective pain relief in situations where surgery is delayed.

Clinical practice and nursing management of pre-operative skin or skeletal traction for hip fractures in elderly patients: a cross-sectional three-institution study

BACKGROUND

Femoral fractures are a major healthcare problem worldwide. One of the most difficult issues is their preoperative care, which is still managed by either skeletal or skin traction in some countries, including Italy. These issues are discussed and compared with the contemporary literature.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyse the distribution of these treatment options within the orthopaedic community and the reasons for their use, as well as to identify how this may impact nursing care in terms of pain management, hygiene care, venous thromboembolism (VTE)prophylaxis and prevention of pressure ulcers.

DESIGN

For this cross-sectional study, a 12-item survey was administered to the nursing staff, consultants and residents of the Orthopaedic Units in three different hospitals in NorthEastern Italy. The questionnaire investigated the routine use of skeletal or skin traction for the preoperative management of hip fractures in those settings.

FINDINGS

136 surveys were completed, providing a response rate of 87.74%. Preoperative traction for hip fractures was still in use in the three hospitals, mainly applied by experienced surgeons for subtrochanteric fractures. Pain management, VTE and pressure ulcer prevention were perceived as worse only with skeletal traction, while hygiene was described as more difficult with both skeletal and skin traction.

CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the data and the literature revision, skin or skeletal traction for patients with proximal femoral fractures should be discouraged as standard practice. This is supported widely in the international literature, and consideration of knowledge translation strategies should be made to refine current practice in these settings.

History of traction for treatment of lower limb fractures

The last two hundred years have seen the development of different systems of traction with effective methods of applying traction to the foot or to the leg for the treatment of fractures of the femur. The success of these methods has been tested during many wars by clinical evaluations but also by means of x-rays since the beginning of the twentieth century. Because of their advantages, these methods of traction were very frequent during the first part of the twentieth century. Crosby, Smith, Buck, Hodgen, Steinmann, Codivilla, Kirschner, and Pearson are names recurring daily on our fracture wards. Their concern for the welfare of their patients led to substantial improvements in the treatment of all patients with fractures.